{"title":"A direct approach of causal detection for agriculture related variables via spatial and temporal non-parametric analysis","authors":"Ray-Ming Chen","doi":"10.1007/s10651-023-00595-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding the causality between biological variables or their related variables is beneficial in environmental or biological policy making. The usual approaches revealing the relations between them are traditional ANOVA or regression models. These models normally resort to a plethora of assumptions regarding the population, the covariance or the error distributions. Checking the validity of these assumptions might in turn rely on other batches of assumptions. This shall cause a huge burden on the interpretation and calculation. Even if all the assumptions are taken for granted or validly checked, the traditional approaches reveal more on the correlation or association properties and less on the causality, because of the fundamental reasoning is based on distance functions or the least squared methods, which are symmetric indicators. We devise a method which directly measures the causality between vectors, which in turn measures the causal relation between agriculture-related variables. The measure takes monotonicity, temporal properties, asymmetry and additivity into consideration. It is then implemented by a set of simulated data and two sets of agriculture-related data. This method could validate or invalidate the existence of positive or negative causal relations between agriculture-related variables. In the end, we analyze the advantages and disadvantages of this method.</p>","PeriodicalId":50519,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Ecological Statistics","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Ecological Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-023-00595-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Understanding the causality between biological variables or their related variables is beneficial in environmental or biological policy making. The usual approaches revealing the relations between them are traditional ANOVA or regression models. These models normally resort to a plethora of assumptions regarding the population, the covariance or the error distributions. Checking the validity of these assumptions might in turn rely on other batches of assumptions. This shall cause a huge burden on the interpretation and calculation. Even if all the assumptions are taken for granted or validly checked, the traditional approaches reveal more on the correlation or association properties and less on the causality, because of the fundamental reasoning is based on distance functions or the least squared methods, which are symmetric indicators. We devise a method which directly measures the causality between vectors, which in turn measures the causal relation between agriculture-related variables. The measure takes monotonicity, temporal properties, asymmetry and additivity into consideration. It is then implemented by a set of simulated data and two sets of agriculture-related data. This method could validate or invalidate the existence of positive or negative causal relations between agriculture-related variables. In the end, we analyze the advantages and disadvantages of this method.
期刊介绍:
Environmental and Ecological Statistics publishes papers on practical applications of statistics and related quantitative methods to environmental science addressing contemporary issues.
Emphasis is on applied mathematical statistics, statistical methodology, and data interpretation and improvement for future use, with a view to advance statistics for environment, ecology and environmental health, and to advance environmental theory and practice using valid statistics.
Besides clarity of exposition, a single most important criterion for publication is the appropriateness of the statistical method to the particular environmental problem. The Journal covers all aspects of the collection, analysis, presentation and interpretation of environmental data for research, policy and regulation. The Journal is cross-disciplinary within the context of contemporary environmental issues and the associated statistical tools, concepts and methods. The Journal broadly covers theory and methods, case studies and applications, environmental change and statistical ecology, environmental health statistics and stochastics, and related areas. Special features include invited discussion papers; research communications; technical notes and consultation corner; mini-reviews; letters to the Editor; news, views and announcements; hardware and software reviews; data management etc.