The Clone-Censor-Weight Method in Pharmacoepidemiologic Research: Foundations and Methodological Implementation

Charles E. Gaber, Kent A. Hanson, Sodam Kim, Jennifer L. Lund, Todd A. Lee, Eleanor J. Murray
{"title":"The Clone-Censor-Weight Method in Pharmacoepidemiologic Research: Foundations and Methodological Implementation","authors":"Charles E. Gaber, Kent A. Hanson, Sodam Kim, Jennifer L. Lund, Todd A. Lee, Eleanor J. Murray","doi":"10.1007/s40471-024-00346-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose of Review</h3><p>Over the past two decades, cautions have repeatedly been issued about the potential for immortal time bias in observational studies. This bias is particularly relevant in fields that routinely leverage large secondary databases such as pharmacoepidemiology. A variety of study design and analysis tools exist to prevent immortal time bias. A newer approach, the clone-censor-weight method, successfully eliminates the possibility for immortal time while maintaining a target trial emulation framework. We review the rationale for the clone-censor-weight approach, outline the steps for implementation, compare the method to other tools for handling immortal time, and describe how the method has been used in a convenience sample of applied studies.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Recent Findings</h3><p>The clone-censor-weight method offers distinct advantages over other methods for handling immortal time bias, namely the retention of a target trial emulation framework. The clone-censor-weight method has been used across numerous substantive areas within pharmacoepidemiology, with variation in how the method is implemented.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Summary</h3><p>The clone-censor-weight method represents a rigorous approach for emulating a target trial and preventing immortal time bias. Many pharmacoepidemiologic studies would benefit from appropriate use of this method, though future work should illuminate the impact of different implementation choices.</p>","PeriodicalId":48527,"journal":{"name":"Current Epidemiology Reports","volume":"109 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Epidemiology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40471-024-00346-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Over the past two decades, cautions have repeatedly been issued about the potential for immortal time bias in observational studies. This bias is particularly relevant in fields that routinely leverage large secondary databases such as pharmacoepidemiology. A variety of study design and analysis tools exist to prevent immortal time bias. A newer approach, the clone-censor-weight method, successfully eliminates the possibility for immortal time while maintaining a target trial emulation framework. We review the rationale for the clone-censor-weight approach, outline the steps for implementation, compare the method to other tools for handling immortal time, and describe how the method has been used in a convenience sample of applied studies.

Recent Findings

The clone-censor-weight method offers distinct advantages over other methods for handling immortal time bias, namely the retention of a target trial emulation framework. The clone-censor-weight method has been used across numerous substantive areas within pharmacoepidemiology, with variation in how the method is implemented.

Summary

The clone-censor-weight method represents a rigorous approach for emulating a target trial and preventing immortal time bias. Many pharmacoepidemiologic studies would benefit from appropriate use of this method, though future work should illuminate the impact of different implementation choices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药物流行病学研究中的克隆-审查-权重法:基础和方法实施
综述目的在过去的二十年中,人们一再提醒观察性研究中可能存在不朽时间偏差。在药物流行病学等经常利用大型二级数据库的领域,这种偏倚尤为重要。有多种研究设计和分析工具可以防止不朽时间偏差。一种较新的方法--克隆-张量-加权法,在保持目标试验模拟框架的同时,成功地消除了不朽时间的可能性。我们回顾了克隆-校验-加权法的基本原理,概述了实施步骤,将该方法与其他处理不朽时间的工具进行了比较,并介绍了该方法在方便抽样的应用研究中的使用情况。最近的研究结果克隆-校验-加权法与其他处理不朽时间偏差的方法相比具有明显的优势,即保留了目标试验模拟框架。克隆-校验-加权法已被用于药物流行病学的多个实质性领域,但实施方法各不相同。摘要克隆-校验-加权法是模拟目标试验和防止不死时间偏倚的一种严格方法。许多药物流行病学研究都将受益于该方法的适当使用,但未来的工作应阐明不同实施选择的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Epidemiology Reports
Current Epidemiology Reports OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊最新文献
Gentrification and Health: A Review of the Literature, 2018–2023 The Target Cohort Approach: An Extension of the Target Trial Framework to Nested Case-Control Studies with Incidence Density Sampling The Intersection of the Microbiome and Adiposity in Cancer Risk and Outcomes: Breast, Endometrial, and Colorectal Cancers Towards a Precision Model for Environmental Public Health: Wastewater-based Epidemiology to Assess Population-level Exposures and Related Diseases Vitamin D and Toxic Metals in Pregnancy - a Biological Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1