Gentrification and Health: A Review of the Literature, 2018–2023

Samantha Hernandez, Mickey McGlasson, Carlyn Van Dyke, Tiffany L. Gary-Webb
{"title":"Gentrification and Health: A Review of the Literature, 2018–2023","authors":"Samantha Hernandez, Mickey McGlasson, Carlyn Van Dyke, Tiffany L. Gary-Webb","doi":"10.1007/s40471-024-00352-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose of Review</h3><p>In this review, we focus on the health impacts of gentrification for residents of gentrifying areas versus comparison groups. This study builds on prior literature reviews that have been similar in focus, and summarizes US-based articles published between January 2018 and January 2023.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Recent Findings</h3><p>The 22 studies included in this review measured multiple health outcomes, including both physical and mental health, and demonstrated mixed results across those health outcomes, including both positive and negative associations, related to gentrification. The variations in measurement methodology for both gentrification and health outcomes, however, make findings in this domain very difficult to summarize. Nonetheless, one theme that emerges across the existing body of research is that the health outcomes associated with gentrification, whether positive or negative in the context of a given study, are generally worse for Black residents when race is considered.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Summary</h3><p>We identified several key challenges related to measuring the association between gentrification and health. These include: 1) the presence of social and physical conditions that make it hard to isolate the effects of gentrification, 2) reliance on self-reported outcome data, and most significantly, 3) lack of longitudinal measurements on a consistent cohort of individuals over time. Ultimately, these collective gaps in the literature strongly suggest that more research is needed before social and public health scientists can have a robust understanding of how gentrification affects the health of a population.</p>","PeriodicalId":48527,"journal":{"name":"Current Epidemiology Reports","volume":"113 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Epidemiology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40471-024-00352-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of Review

In this review, we focus on the health impacts of gentrification for residents of gentrifying areas versus comparison groups. This study builds on prior literature reviews that have been similar in focus, and summarizes US-based articles published between January 2018 and January 2023.

Recent Findings

The 22 studies included in this review measured multiple health outcomes, including both physical and mental health, and demonstrated mixed results across those health outcomes, including both positive and negative associations, related to gentrification. The variations in measurement methodology for both gentrification and health outcomes, however, make findings in this domain very difficult to summarize. Nonetheless, one theme that emerges across the existing body of research is that the health outcomes associated with gentrification, whether positive or negative in the context of a given study, are generally worse for Black residents when race is considered.

Summary

We identified several key challenges related to measuring the association between gentrification and health. These include: 1) the presence of social and physical conditions that make it hard to isolate the effects of gentrification, 2) reliance on self-reported outcome data, and most significantly, 3) lack of longitudinal measurements on a consistent cohort of individuals over time. Ultimately, these collective gaps in the literature strongly suggest that more research is needed before social and public health scientists can have a robust understanding of how gentrification affects the health of a population.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
城市化与健康2018-2023年文献综述
综述目的在本综述中,我们重点研究了城市化对城市化地区居民和对比群体的健康影响。本研究建立在之前重点类似的文献综述基础上,并总结了 2018 年 1 月至 2023 年 1 月间发表的美国文章。最新研究结果本综述所包含的 22 项研究测量了多种健康结果,包括身体和心理健康,并在这些健康结果中显示了与城市化相关的混合结果,包括正相关和负相关。然而,由于对城市化和健康结果的测量方法各不相同,因此很难对这一领域的研究结果进行总结。尽管如此,现有研究中出现的一个主题是,与城市化相关的健康结果,无论在特定研究中是积极的还是消极的,如果考虑到种族因素,对于黑人居民来说一般都比较糟糕。这些挑战包括1) 社会和物质条件的存在使我们很难将城市化的影响分离出来;2) 依赖于自我报告的结果数据;最重要的是,3) 缺乏对长期一致的人群进行纵向测量。归根结底,文献中存在的这些共同缺陷强烈表明,在社会和公共卫生科学家对城市化如何影响人口健康有深刻理解之前,还需要进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Epidemiology Reports
Current Epidemiology Reports OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊最新文献
Gentrification and Health: A Review of the Literature, 2018–2023 The Target Cohort Approach: An Extension of the Target Trial Framework to Nested Case-Control Studies with Incidence Density Sampling The Intersection of the Microbiome and Adiposity in Cancer Risk and Outcomes: Breast, Endometrial, and Colorectal Cancers Towards a Precision Model for Environmental Public Health: Wastewater-based Epidemiology to Assess Population-level Exposures and Related Diseases Vitamin D and Toxic Metals in Pregnancy - a Biological Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1