Sensitivity of HAFS-B Tropical Cyclone Forecasts to Planetary Boundary Layer and Microphysics Parameterizations

A. Hazelton, Xiaomin Chen, G. Alaka, G. Alvey, S. Gopalakrishnan, Frank Marks
{"title":"Sensitivity of HAFS-B Tropical Cyclone Forecasts to Planetary Boundary Layer and Microphysics Parameterizations","authors":"A. Hazelton, Xiaomin Chen, G. Alaka, G. Alvey, S. Gopalakrishnan, Frank Marks","doi":"10.1175/waf-d-23-0124.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nUnderstanding how model physics impact tropical cyclone (TC) structure, motion, and evolution is critical for the development of TC forecast models. This study examines the impacts of microphysics and planetary boundary layer (PBL) physics on forecasts using the Hurricane Analysis and Forecast System (HAFS), which is newly operational in 2023. The “HAFS-B” version is specifically evaluated, and 3 sensitivity tests (for over 400 cases in 15 Atlantic TCs) are compared with retrospective HAFS-B runs. Sensitivity tests are generated by 1) Changing the microphysics in HAFS-B from Thompson to GFDL, 2) turning off the TC-specific PBL modifications that have been implemented in operational HAFS-B, and 3) combining the PBL and microphysics modifications. The forecasts are compared through standard verification metrics, and also examination of composite structure. Verification results show that Thompson microphysics slightly degrades the Day 3-4 forecast track in HAFS-B, but improves forecasts of long-term intensity. The TC-specific PBL changes lead to a reduction in a negative intensity bias and improvement in RI skill, but cause some degradation in prediction of 34-knot wind radii. Composites illustrate slightly deeper vortices in runs with the Thompson microphysics, and stronger PBL inflow with the TC-specific PBL modifications. These combined results demonstrate the critical role of model physics in regulating TC structure and intensity, and point to the need to continue to develop improvements to HAFS physics. The study also shows that the combination of both PBL and microphysics modifications (which are both included in one of the two versions of HAFS in the first operational implementation) leads to the best overall results.","PeriodicalId":509742,"journal":{"name":"Weather and Forecasting","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Weather and Forecasting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/waf-d-23-0124.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding how model physics impact tropical cyclone (TC) structure, motion, and evolution is critical for the development of TC forecast models. This study examines the impacts of microphysics and planetary boundary layer (PBL) physics on forecasts using the Hurricane Analysis and Forecast System (HAFS), which is newly operational in 2023. The “HAFS-B” version is specifically evaluated, and 3 sensitivity tests (for over 400 cases in 15 Atlantic TCs) are compared with retrospective HAFS-B runs. Sensitivity tests are generated by 1) Changing the microphysics in HAFS-B from Thompson to GFDL, 2) turning off the TC-specific PBL modifications that have been implemented in operational HAFS-B, and 3) combining the PBL and microphysics modifications. The forecasts are compared through standard verification metrics, and also examination of composite structure. Verification results show that Thompson microphysics slightly degrades the Day 3-4 forecast track in HAFS-B, but improves forecasts of long-term intensity. The TC-specific PBL changes lead to a reduction in a negative intensity bias and improvement in RI skill, but cause some degradation in prediction of 34-knot wind radii. Composites illustrate slightly deeper vortices in runs with the Thompson microphysics, and stronger PBL inflow with the TC-specific PBL modifications. These combined results demonstrate the critical role of model physics in regulating TC structure and intensity, and point to the need to continue to develop improvements to HAFS physics. The study also shows that the combination of both PBL and microphysics modifications (which are both included in one of the two versions of HAFS in the first operational implementation) leads to the best overall results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
HAFS-B 热带气旋预报对行星边界层和微物理参数化的敏感性
了解模式物理如何影响热带气旋(TC)的结构、运动和演变对于开发热带气旋预报模式至关重要。本研究利用 2023 年新投入运行的飓风分析和预报系统(HAFS),研究了微物理和行星边界层(PBL)物理对预报的影响。对 "HAFS-B "版本进行了专门评估,并将 3 个敏感性测试(针对 15 个大西洋热带气旋的 400 多个案例)与回溯 HAFS-B 运行进行了比较。灵敏度测试是通过以下方式进行的:1)将 HAFS-B 中的微物理量从 Thompson 改为 GFDL;2)关闭已在运行的 HAFS-B 中实施的针对热带气旋的 PBL 修改;3)结合 PBL 和微物理量修改。通过标准验证指标和复合结构检查对预报进行比较。验证结果表明,汤普森微物理略微降低了HAFS-B的第3-4天预报轨迹,但改善了长期强度预报。针对热带气旋的副热带高压变化减少了负强度偏差,提高了 RI 技能,但对 34 节风半径的预测有所下降。复合结果表明,在使用汤普森微物理的运行中,涡旋略深,而在使用针对热带气旋的 PBL 修改时,PBL 流入更强。这些综合结果表明了模式物理在调节热气旋结构和强度方面的关键作用,并指出需要继续改进 HAFS 物理。该研究还表明,结合使用短波层和微物理修改(这两种修改都包含在 HAFS 首次运行的两个版本中的一个版本中)可获得最佳的总体结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improvement of Wind Power Prediction by Assimilating Principal Components of Cabin Radar Observations Tropical cyclones in the GEOS-S2S-2 subseasonal forecasts Regime-Dependent Characteristics and Predictability of Cold Season Precipitation Events in the St. Lawrence River Valley The evolution of the 2021 Seacor Power Tragedy in Coastal Louisiana Representation of Blowing Snow and Associated Visibility Reduction in an Operational High-Resolution Weather Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1