Investigating errors made by English as a foreign language students during online collaborative writing

Jitlada Moonma
{"title":"Investigating errors made by English as a foreign language students during online collaborative writing","authors":"Jitlada Moonma","doi":"10.20448/edu.v10i1.5386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study focused on investigating common writing errors made by a group of Thai students who participated in online collaborative writing using Google Docs, and understanding their satisfaction and attitudes on this writing approach. The participants consisted 32 Thai first-year English major students who were purposively selected from their Writing I course. The researcher collected and analyzed eight argumentative pieces of writing, identifying a total of 484 errors. The most frequently occurring error areas were incomplete sentences (15.75%), spelling mistakes (13.50%), and word choice issues (12.25%), with grammatical errors being the most prevalent (72%). Following grammatical errors were lexical (12%) and mechanical errors (4%). To gauge students' satisfactions and attitudes, a questionnaire and semi-structured interviews were employed. The findings revealed that the students were highly satisfied with online collaborative writing with an average satisfaction score of 3.50. Overall, the students exhibited a positive attitude towards online collaborative writing, finding it useful due to its flexibility in terms of allowing them to work from anywhere at any time and for its ability to boost their motivation. The study's findings provide valuable insights for English teaching professionals in Thailand to consider when instructing students in writing.","PeriodicalId":486915,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of education and training","volume":"26 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of education and training","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20448/edu.v10i1.5386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study focused on investigating common writing errors made by a group of Thai students who participated in online collaborative writing using Google Docs, and understanding their satisfaction and attitudes on this writing approach. The participants consisted 32 Thai first-year English major students who were purposively selected from their Writing I course. The researcher collected and analyzed eight argumentative pieces of writing, identifying a total of 484 errors. The most frequently occurring error areas were incomplete sentences (15.75%), spelling mistakes (13.50%), and word choice issues (12.25%), with grammatical errors being the most prevalent (72%). Following grammatical errors were lexical (12%) and mechanical errors (4%). To gauge students' satisfactions and attitudes, a questionnaire and semi-structured interviews were employed. The findings revealed that the students were highly satisfied with online collaborative writing with an average satisfaction score of 3.50. Overall, the students exhibited a positive attitude towards online collaborative writing, finding it useful due to its flexibility in terms of allowing them to work from anywhere at any time and for its ability to boost their motivation. The study's findings provide valuable insights for English teaching professionals in Thailand to consider when instructing students in writing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查英语作为外语的学生在在线协作写作中出现的错误
本研究的重点是调查一组泰国学生在使用谷歌文档进行在线协作写作时常见的写作错误,并了解他们对这种写作方法的满意度和态度。参与者包括 32 名泰国英语专业一年级学生,他们都是从写作 I 课程中特意挑选出来的。研究人员收集并分析了 8 篇议论文,共发现 484 处错误。出现最多的错误是句子不完整(15.75%)、拼写错误(13.50%)和选词问题(12.25%),其中语法错误最多(72%)。紧随语法错误之后的是词汇错误(12%)和机械错误(4%)。为了解学生的满意度和态度,采用了问卷调查和半结构式访谈的方法。调查结果显示,学生对在线协作写作非常满意,平均满意度为 3.50 分。总体而言,学生们对在线协作写作持积极态度,认为在线协作写作非常有用,因为它具有灵活性,允许他们随时随地工作,而且能够提高他们的积极性。研究结果为泰国英语教学专业人员在指导学生写作时提供了宝贵的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring the multifaceted roles of English for specific purposes practitioners within the transformative paradigm in higher education Assessment of the prevention and problem solving of drug problem with participation in schools under the local administrative organization in Sisaket province Investigating errors made by English as a foreign language students during online collaborative writing Investigating errors made by English as a foreign language students during online collaborative writing Attitude of clinical teachers towards the use of innovative technology in teaching and learning in the university of Port Harcourt medical school, South Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1