Exploring participation and engagement in a multi-component, universal early parenting programme

Gráinne Hickey, Yvonne Leckey, S. McGilloway
{"title":"Exploring participation and engagement in a multi-component, universal early parenting programme","authors":"Gráinne Hickey, Yvonne Leckey, S. McGilloway","doi":"10.1108/jcs-06-2023-0038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nParenting programmes are increasingly a feature of services and policies aimed at improving outcomes for children and families and tackling inequality, yet they remain underused. This study aims to assess parent engagement and retention in the parent and infant (PIN) programme – a universal, multi-component intervention designed to support parents from birth to when their children reach two years of age. The programme can be tailored to parent/community needs but also includes standardised core elements including two Incredible Years parenting programmes. Programme provider perspectives on recruiting and supporting participation were also explored.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA mixed methods study was conducted involving parents (n = 106) and programme providers involved in the PIN programme. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess the impact of participant demographic characteristics on the likelihood of programme engagement and attendance. Semi-structured interviews explored facilitators’ experiences of parent recruitment and engagement, as well as barriers and facilitators of parental attendance.\n\n\nFindings\nFirst-time mothers were more likely to initially enrol in the PIN programme than younger or lone parents. However, older age and married/cohabiting status were the strongest predictors of attending at least one-third of programme sessions. Qualitative findings highlighted the importance of relationship building and connection in supporting participant recruitment and engagement. Practical and psychological barriers to programme participation are also described.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe findings shed light on factors that influence engagement and attendance in universal, early parent support programmes. Barriers to parent engagement are multi-layered and tailored strategies to promote uptake of parenting programmes are needed.\n","PeriodicalId":510267,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Children's Services","volume":"57 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Children's Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcs-06-2023-0038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Parenting programmes are increasingly a feature of services and policies aimed at improving outcomes for children and families and tackling inequality, yet they remain underused. This study aims to assess parent engagement and retention in the parent and infant (PIN) programme – a universal, multi-component intervention designed to support parents from birth to when their children reach two years of age. The programme can be tailored to parent/community needs but also includes standardised core elements including two Incredible Years parenting programmes. Programme provider perspectives on recruiting and supporting participation were also explored. Design/methodology/approach A mixed methods study was conducted involving parents (n = 106) and programme providers involved in the PIN programme. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess the impact of participant demographic characteristics on the likelihood of programme engagement and attendance. Semi-structured interviews explored facilitators’ experiences of parent recruitment and engagement, as well as barriers and facilitators of parental attendance. Findings First-time mothers were more likely to initially enrol in the PIN programme than younger or lone parents. However, older age and married/cohabiting status were the strongest predictors of attending at least one-third of programme sessions. Qualitative findings highlighted the importance of relationship building and connection in supporting participant recruitment and engagement. Practical and psychological barriers to programme participation are also described. Originality/value The findings shed light on factors that influence engagement and attendance in universal, early parent support programmes. Barriers to parent engagement are multi-layered and tailored strategies to promote uptake of parenting programmes are needed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索多成分、普及型早期育儿计划中的参与和投入情况
目的 育儿计划日益成为旨在改善儿童和家庭成果以及解决不平等问题的服务和政策的一个特点,但这些计划仍未得到充分利用。这项研究旨在评估父母和婴儿(PIN)计划中父母的参与度和保留率,该计划是一项普遍的、多成分的干预措施,旨在为父母提供从孩子出生到两岁期间的支持。该计划可根据家长/社区的需求量身定制,但也包括标准化的核心要素,其中包括两个 "不可思议年 "育儿计划。此外,还探讨了计划提供者在招募和支持参与计划方面的观点。设计/方法/途径开展了一项混合方法研究,参与 PIN 计划的家长(n = 106)和计划提供者都参与了这项研究。使用逻辑回归分析评估了参与者人口特征对参与计划和参加计划的可能性的影响。半结构式访谈探讨了促进者在家长招募和参与方面的经验,以及家长参与的障碍和促进因素。研究结果与年轻父母或单亲父母相比,初为人母的母亲更有可能首次报名参加 PIN 计划。然而,年龄较大和已婚/同居状态是预测参加至少三分之一计划课程的最有力因素。定性研究结果强调了建立关系和联系对于支持参与者招募和参与的重要性。研究结果揭示了影响参与和参加普及型早期家长支持计划的因素。影响家长参与的障碍是多层次的,因此需要采取有针对性的策略来促进家长参与亲职教育项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“Picture this, picture me”: community based peer-to-peer and family support for children impacted by parental imprisonment Exploring participation and engagement in a multi-component, universal early parenting programme Exploring participation and engagement in a multi-component, universal early parenting programme Shipping containers and speed boats: exploring the contexts and relational spaces professionals navigate to safeguard young people from criminal exploitation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1