Improving the sensitivity of cochlear implant integrity testing by recording electrode voltages with surface electrodes

M. Grasmeder, Katrine Rogers, Ziya Aydin, Kate Hough, Carl Verschuur, Tracey Newman
{"title":"Improving the sensitivity of cochlear implant integrity testing by recording electrode voltages with surface electrodes","authors":"M. Grasmeder, Katrine Rogers, Ziya Aydin, Kate Hough, Carl Verschuur, Tracey Newman","doi":"10.3389/fauot.2024.1342263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Identification of faults with the internal, implanted, part of a cochlear implant presents a challenge for the cochlear implant community. Advanced Bionics Ultra V1 devices are vulnerable to moisture ingress, a hard failure, resulting in reduced volume and clarity for the recipient. The manufacturer uses a trans-impedance test “Electrical Field Imaging” to identify faulty Ultra V1 devices but reports the sensitivity of the test to be only 70–90%.In our clinic we performed Electrode Voltage measurements with surface electrodes and have compared the two tests. Electrical Field imaging and Electrode Voltage (EV) measurements were available for 65 devices. Surface electrodes were attached to the earlobes and forehead and potentials measured in three montages: ipsilateral earlobe and forehead, contralateral earlobe and forehead, and both earlobes; voltages were extracted and relative voltages across the array were calculated.Relative EV were compared for the two earlobes montage and fitted to a third order polynomial function. A new criterion for identifying faulty devices was derived, with a deviation of < 6% for individual electrodes for normally functioning devices or ≥6% for faulty devices. All devices which were normal according to the new criterion (N = 15) had a normal electrical field imaging test, whilst 17/50 devices which were abnormal had normal electrical field imaging and 33/50 which were abnormal had abnormal electrical field imaging.The REVs test was well-tolerated and carried out in a routine cochlear implant clinic. Together with test sensitivity and reliability this may make it a new routine assessment tool to aid in distinguishing hard and soft failures.","PeriodicalId":507438,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Audiology and Otology","volume":"428 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Audiology and Otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fauot.2024.1342263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Identification of faults with the internal, implanted, part of a cochlear implant presents a challenge for the cochlear implant community. Advanced Bionics Ultra V1 devices are vulnerable to moisture ingress, a hard failure, resulting in reduced volume and clarity for the recipient. The manufacturer uses a trans-impedance test “Electrical Field Imaging” to identify faulty Ultra V1 devices but reports the sensitivity of the test to be only 70–90%.In our clinic we performed Electrode Voltage measurements with surface electrodes and have compared the two tests. Electrical Field imaging and Electrode Voltage (EV) measurements were available for 65 devices. Surface electrodes were attached to the earlobes and forehead and potentials measured in three montages: ipsilateral earlobe and forehead, contralateral earlobe and forehead, and both earlobes; voltages were extracted and relative voltages across the array were calculated.Relative EV were compared for the two earlobes montage and fitted to a third order polynomial function. A new criterion for identifying faulty devices was derived, with a deviation of < 6% for individual electrodes for normally functioning devices or ≥6% for faulty devices. All devices which were normal according to the new criterion (N = 15) had a normal electrical field imaging test, whilst 17/50 devices which were abnormal had normal electrical field imaging and 33/50 which were abnormal had abnormal electrical field imaging.The REVs test was well-tolerated and carried out in a routine cochlear implant clinic. Together with test sensitivity and reliability this may make it a new routine assessment tool to aid in distinguishing hard and soft failures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用表面电极记录电极电压,提高人工耳蜗完整性测试的灵敏度
识别人工耳蜗内部植入部分的故障是人工耳蜗界面临的一项挑战。Advanced Bionics Ultra V1 设备很容易受潮,这是一种硬性故障,会导致受体的音量和清晰度降低。制造商使用跨阻抗测试 "电场成像 "来识别有问题的 Ultra V1 设备,但据报告,该测试的灵敏度仅为 70-90%。电场成像和电极电压 (EV) 测量适用于 65 种设备。将表面电极连接到耳垂和前额,在三个单体中测量电位:同侧耳垂和前额、对侧耳垂和前额以及双耳垂;提取电压并计算整个阵列的相对电压。得出了识别故障设备的新标准,即正常设备的单个电极偏差小于 6%,或故障设备的单个电极偏差≥6%。根据新标准,所有正常的设备(N = 15)都有正常的电场成像测试,而 17/50 个异常设备有正常的电场成像,33/50 个异常设备有异常的电场成像。REVs测试的灵敏度和可靠性使其成为一种新的常规评估工具,可帮助区分硬故障和软故障。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optical method to preserve residual hearing in patients receiving a cochlear implant Temporal processing abilities in normal hearing individuals with tinnitus: a systematic review Pros and cons of a bone-conduction device implanted in the worse hearing ear of patients with asymmetric hearing loss Improving the sensitivity of cochlear implant integrity testing by recording electrode voltages with surface electrodes Improving the sensitivity of cochlear implant integrity testing by recording electrode voltages with surface electrodes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1