Sho Kurihara, A. Ganaha, Takeshi Nakamura, Kan Kubuki, Emi Saruwatari, Koudai Matsui, Kuniyuki Takahashi, Tetsuya Tono
{"title":"Pros and cons of a bone-conduction device implanted in the worse hearing ear of patients with asymmetric hearing loss","authors":"Sho Kurihara, A. Ganaha, Takeshi Nakamura, Kan Kubuki, Emi Saruwatari, Koudai Matsui, Kuniyuki Takahashi, Tetsuya Tono","doi":"10.3389/fauot.2024.1362443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bone-conduction devices can be considered a viable treatment option for patients experiencing asymmetric hearing loss (AHL), especially those with severe to profound hearing loss (HL) present in one ear. However, there are only a few reports on the effects of bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHAs) on patients with AHL. This retrospective study analyzed in detail the effects of BAHA on softer sounds than other hearing aids and identified situations in which BAHA had a negative effect.Patients with AHL, characterized by severe to profound hearing loss in one ear with a difference of ≥45 dB from that of the contralateral ear, underwent BAHA implantation in the ear with worse hearing. The BAHA effects were evaluated by assessing the word recognition score (WRS) and speech reception threshold (SRT) using the Japanese Oldenburg Sentence Test for various signal settings and noise directions. For a subjective analysis, the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ12) score was determined.Thirteen patients who underwent BAHA implantation at the Miyazaki University Hospital between 2007 and 2021 were included. The BAHA demonstrated a significant improvement in the WRS from 40 to 70 dB sound pressure levels. Although the SRT showed significant improvement in noisy environments when speech was presented to the BAHA-wearing side, it worsened significantly when noise was presented to this side. In the survey of subjective hearing ability, both the total and subscale SSQ12 scores improved significantly after wearing the BAHA.This study identified scenarios in which BAHAs were beneficial and detrimental to individuals with AHL. Generally used audiological tests, such as the WRS with fixed sound pressure, may underestimate the effectiveness of BAHAs for softer sounds. In addition, depending on the direction of the noise, BAHAs may have adverse effects. These results could help patients comprehend the potential benefits and limitations of bone-conduction devices for their hearing.","PeriodicalId":507438,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Audiology and Otology","volume":"53 30","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Audiology and Otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fauot.2024.1362443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Bone-conduction devices can be considered a viable treatment option for patients experiencing asymmetric hearing loss (AHL), especially those with severe to profound hearing loss (HL) present in one ear. However, there are only a few reports on the effects of bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHAs) on patients with AHL. This retrospective study analyzed in detail the effects of BAHA on softer sounds than other hearing aids and identified situations in which BAHA had a negative effect.Patients with AHL, characterized by severe to profound hearing loss in one ear with a difference of ≥45 dB from that of the contralateral ear, underwent BAHA implantation in the ear with worse hearing. The BAHA effects were evaluated by assessing the word recognition score (WRS) and speech reception threshold (SRT) using the Japanese Oldenburg Sentence Test for various signal settings and noise directions. For a subjective analysis, the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ12) score was determined.Thirteen patients who underwent BAHA implantation at the Miyazaki University Hospital between 2007 and 2021 were included. The BAHA demonstrated a significant improvement in the WRS from 40 to 70 dB sound pressure levels. Although the SRT showed significant improvement in noisy environments when speech was presented to the BAHA-wearing side, it worsened significantly when noise was presented to this side. In the survey of subjective hearing ability, both the total and subscale SSQ12 scores improved significantly after wearing the BAHA.This study identified scenarios in which BAHAs were beneficial and detrimental to individuals with AHL. Generally used audiological tests, such as the WRS with fixed sound pressure, may underestimate the effectiveness of BAHAs for softer sounds. In addition, depending on the direction of the noise, BAHAs may have adverse effects. These results could help patients comprehend the potential benefits and limitations of bone-conduction devices for their hearing.
对于非对称性听力损失(AHL)患者,尤其是单耳重度至极重度听力损失(HL)患者来说,骨导助听器是一种可行的治疗方法。然而,有关骨导助听器(BAHA)对非对称性听力损失患者影响的报道却寥寥无几。这项回顾性研究详细分析了 BAHA 对比起其他助听器更柔和的声音的影响,并确定了 BAHA 产生负面影响的情况。AHL 患者的特征是一耳重度到极重度听力损失,与对侧耳的听力差距≥45 dB,他们在听力较差的一耳接受了 BAHA 植入手术。评估 BAHA 效果的方法是在不同信号设置和噪声方向下,使用日本奥登堡句子测试评估单词识别得分(WRS)和语音接收阈值(SRT)。为了进行主观分析,还测定了言语、空间和听力质量量表(SSQ12)的得分。从 40 到 70 dB 声压级之间,BAHA 的 WRS 有明显改善。虽然在嘈杂环境中,向佩戴 BAHA 的一侧播放语音时,SRT 有明显改善,但向佩戴 BAHA 的一侧播放噪音时,SRT 则明显恶化。在主观听力能力调查中,佩戴 BAHA 后,SSQ12 的总分和分值都有明显改善。一般使用的听力测试,如固定声压的 WRS,可能会低估 BAHA 对较柔和声音的效果。此外,根据噪音的方向,BAHA 可能会产生不利影响。这些结果可以帮助患者理解骨传导设备对其听力的潜在益处和局限性。