Generation of Revision Identifier (rsid) Numbers in MS Word

D. Spennemann, Clare L. Singh
{"title":"Generation of Revision Identifier (rsid) Numbers in MS Word","authors":"D. Spennemann, Clare L. Singh","doi":"10.2218/ijdc.v18i1.870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2007 implementation of the Office Open XML standard for Microsoft Word introduced the assignation of individual revision save identifiers (Rsid) to document editing sessions that end in a save action. The relevant standards ECMA (2016) and ISO/ IEC 29500-1:2016 (2016) stipulate that these Rsid should be allocated randomised but with increasing numerical value, thereby documenting the progress of the editing. As MS Word is the most ubiquitous word processing software, Rsid appear to be a useful tool to examine and provide evidence for a wide range of common document generation editing and modification processes and file management operations, with implications for document analysis including, but not limited to academic integrity issues in student assignment submissions (e.g. contract cheating). \nThis paper presents the results of a series of experiments conducted to assess whether and how well MS Word implements the ECMA and ISO/ IEC standards. The results show that the number of allocated Rsid indeed increases with each edit and save action, with the previous Rsids carried over and retained. The newly allocated Rsid, however, do not conform to the standard as the numerical value of a Rsid associated with a save action may be larger or smaller than any or all of those allocated during that of the previous save actions. The allocation of a new Rsid is not necessarily caused by an edit event but that a new Rsid can also be generated if a file is saved as rtf or if it is sent as an e-mail from within MS Word, although the file was not edited in any way. Rsid numbers are not generated if a person opens a MS Word document, reads it and closes the file without saving, making this action impossible to detect.\nMS Word template files on a given machine contain document (root) Rsid numbers that are generated when a newly installed application is launched for the first time. As these will be embedded as legacy Rsid into every new file generated from that template file, they act as signatures for all MS Word documents that are created.\nThe experiments have shown that user behaviour has a direct influence on the number of Rsid represented in a given file. Although the implementation of Office Open XML chosen by Microsoft is not compliant with the relevant standards, and thus Rsid cannot be used determine the exact chronological order of all editing sequences within a given document, the Rsid retain their value for document forensics as they are associated with specific edit events, and illuminate the document writing and editing process.\n ","PeriodicalId":87279,"journal":{"name":"International journal of digital curation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of digital curation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v18i1.870","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 2007 implementation of the Office Open XML standard for Microsoft Word introduced the assignation of individual revision save identifiers (Rsid) to document editing sessions that end in a save action. The relevant standards ECMA (2016) and ISO/ IEC 29500-1:2016 (2016) stipulate that these Rsid should be allocated randomised but with increasing numerical value, thereby documenting the progress of the editing. As MS Word is the most ubiquitous word processing software, Rsid appear to be a useful tool to examine and provide evidence for a wide range of common document generation editing and modification processes and file management operations, with implications for document analysis including, but not limited to academic integrity issues in student assignment submissions (e.g. contract cheating). This paper presents the results of a series of experiments conducted to assess whether and how well MS Word implements the ECMA and ISO/ IEC standards. The results show that the number of allocated Rsid indeed increases with each edit and save action, with the previous Rsids carried over and retained. The newly allocated Rsid, however, do not conform to the standard as the numerical value of a Rsid associated with a save action may be larger or smaller than any or all of those allocated during that of the previous save actions. The allocation of a new Rsid is not necessarily caused by an edit event but that a new Rsid can also be generated if a file is saved as rtf or if it is sent as an e-mail from within MS Word, although the file was not edited in any way. Rsid numbers are not generated if a person opens a MS Word document, reads it and closes the file without saving, making this action impossible to detect. MS Word template files on a given machine contain document (root) Rsid numbers that are generated when a newly installed application is launched for the first time. As these will be embedded as legacy Rsid into every new file generated from that template file, they act as signatures for all MS Word documents that are created. The experiments have shown that user behaviour has a direct influence on the number of Rsid represented in a given file. Although the implementation of Office Open XML chosen by Microsoft is not compliant with the relevant standards, and thus Rsid cannot be used determine the exact chronological order of all editing sequences within a given document, the Rsid retain their value for document forensics as they are associated with specific edit events, and illuminate the document writing and editing process.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在 MS Word 中生成修订版标识符 (rsid) 编号
2007 年实施的 Microsoft Word Office Open XML 标准为以保存操作结束的文档编辑会话分配了单个修订保存标识符(Rsid)。相关标准 ECMA (2016) 和 ISO/ IEC 29500-1:2016 (2016) 规定,这些 Rsid 应随机分配,但数值应不断增加,从而记录编辑进度。由于 MS Word 是最普遍的文字处理软件,Rsid 似乎是一种有用的工具,可用于检查各种常见文档的生成、编辑和修改过程以及文件管理操作,并为其提供证据,其对文档分析的影响包括但不限于学生作业提交中的学术诚信问题(如合同作弊)。本文介绍了一系列实验的结果,这些实验旨在评估 MS Word 是否以及如何很好地执行 ECMA 和 ISO/ IEC 标准。结果表明,分配的 Rsid 数量确实随着每次编辑和保存操作的进行而增加,之前的 Rsid 会被继承和保留。不过,新分配的 Rsid 并不符合标准,因为与保存操作相关的 Rsid 数值可能大于或小于之前保存操作中分配的任何或所有 Rsid。新 Rsid 的分配不一定是由编辑事件引起的,但如果文件被保存为 rtf 格式,或者从 MS Word 中以电子邮件的形式发送,也会产生新的 Rsid,尽管文件没有经过任何编辑。如果一个人打开一个 MS Word 文档,读完后没有保存就关闭了文件,则不会生成 Rsid 号码,因此无法检测到这一操作。给定机器上的 MS Word 模板文件包含文档(根)Rsid 号码,这些号码在首次启动新安装的应用程序时生成。实验表明,用户行为对特定文件中的 Rsid 数量有直接影响。尽管微软选择的 Office Open XML 实现不符合相关标准,因此 Rsid 无法用于确定给定文档中所有编辑序列的确切时间顺序,但 Rsid 仍具有文档取证价值,因为它们与特定的编辑事件相关联,并能阐明文档的编写和编辑过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Reproducible and Attributable Materials Science Curation Practices: A Case Study Trusted Research Environments: Analysis of Characteristics and Data Availability Preserving Secondary Knowledge Factors Influencing Perceptions of Trust in Data Infrastructures Assessing Quality Variations in Early Career Researchers’ Data Management Plans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1