Factors Influencing Perceptions of Trust in Data Infrastructures

Katharina Flicker, Andreas Rauber, Bettina Kern, Fajar J. Ekaputra
{"title":"Factors Influencing Perceptions of Trust in Data Infrastructures","authors":"Katharina Flicker, Andreas Rauber, Bettina Kern, Fajar J. Ekaputra","doi":"10.2218/ijdc.v18i1.921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nTrust is an essential pre-condition for the acceptance of digital infrastructures and services. Transparency has been identified as one mechanism for increasing trustworthiness. Yet, it is difficult to assess to which extent and how exactly different aspects of transparency contribute to trust, or potentially impede it in cases of overwhelming complexity of the information provided. To address these issues, we performed two initial studies to help determining the factors that influence or have impact on trust, focusing on transparency across a range of elements associated with data, data infrastructures and virtual research environments. On one hand, we performed a survey among IT experts in the field of data science focusing on quality aspects in the context of re-using and sharing open source software, assessing issues such as the need for documentation, test cases, and accountability. On the other hand, we complemented this with a set of semi-structured interviews with senior researchers to address specific issues of the degree of transparency achievable with different approaches. They include, for example, the amount of transparency we can achieve with approaches from explainable AI, or the usefulness and limitations of data provenance in determining the suitability of data for reuse and others. Specifically, we consider mechanisms on three levels, i.e. technical, process-oriented as well as social mechanisms. Starting from attributes of trust in the “analogue world”, we aim to understand which of these can be applied in the digital world, how they differ, and what additional mechanisms need to be established, in order to support trust in complex socio-technological processes and their emergent results when the traditional approaches cannot be applied anymore.\n","PeriodicalId":87279,"journal":{"name":"International journal of digital curation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of digital curation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v18i1.921","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Trust is an essential pre-condition for the acceptance of digital infrastructures and services. Transparency has been identified as one mechanism for increasing trustworthiness. Yet, it is difficult to assess to which extent and how exactly different aspects of transparency contribute to trust, or potentially impede it in cases of overwhelming complexity of the information provided. To address these issues, we performed two initial studies to help determining the factors that influence or have impact on trust, focusing on transparency across a range of elements associated with data, data infrastructures and virtual research environments. On one hand, we performed a survey among IT experts in the field of data science focusing on quality aspects in the context of re-using and sharing open source software, assessing issues such as the need for documentation, test cases, and accountability. On the other hand, we complemented this with a set of semi-structured interviews with senior researchers to address specific issues of the degree of transparency achievable with different approaches. They include, for example, the amount of transparency we can achieve with approaches from explainable AI, or the usefulness and limitations of data provenance in determining the suitability of data for reuse and others. Specifically, we consider mechanisms on three levels, i.e. technical, process-oriented as well as social mechanisms. Starting from attributes of trust in the “analogue world”, we aim to understand which of these can be applied in the digital world, how they differ, and what additional mechanisms need to be established, in order to support trust in complex socio-technological processes and their emergent results when the traditional approaches cannot be applied anymore.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响对数据基础设施信任感的因素
信任是接受数字基础设施和服务的基本先决条件。透明度被认为是提高信任度的一种机制。然而,很难评估透明度的不同方面在多大程度上以及如何确切地促进信任,或者在所提供的信息过于复杂的情况下可能会阻碍信任。为了解决这些问题,我们进行了两项初步研究,以帮助确定影响信任或对信任有影响的因素,重点是与数据、数据基础设施和虚拟研究环境相关的一系列要素的透明度。一方面,我们对数据科学领域的 IT 专家进行了一项调查,重点关注重复使用和共享开放源代码软件的质量问题,评估了对文档、测试用例和问责制的需求等问题。另一方面,我们还对资深研究人员进行了一系列半结构化访谈,以解决不同方法可实现的透明程度等具体问题。例如,我们可以利用可解释人工智能的方法实现多少透明度,或者数据出处在确定数据是否适合重用等方面的作用和局限性。具体来说,我们考虑了三个层面的机制,即技术机制、流程导向机制和社会机制。从 "模拟世界 "中的信任属性出发,我们旨在了解其中哪些可以应用于数字世界,它们有何不同,以及需要建立哪些额外的机制,以便在传统方法无法继续应用的情况下,支持对复杂的社会技术过程及其新兴结果的信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Reproducible and Attributable Materials Science Curation Practices: A Case Study Trusted Research Environments: Analysis of Characteristics and Data Availability Preserving Secondary Knowledge Factors Influencing Perceptions of Trust in Data Infrastructures Assessing Quality Variations in Early Career Researchers’ Data Management Plans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1