Examination of players’ strategies in determining the optimal groundwater exploitation by game theory

IF 2.4 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Hydrogeology Journal Pub Date : 2024-02-19 DOI:10.1007/s10040-024-02770-6
Mehdi Komasi, Amir Alizadefard, Masoud Ahmadi
{"title":"Examination of players’ strategies in determining the optimal groundwater exploitation by game theory","authors":"Mehdi Komasi, Amir Alizadefard, Masoud Ahmadi","doi":"10.1007/s10040-024-02770-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The growing water demand and decreasing groundwater recharge have made groundwater management one of the most severe challenges in most countries of the world, and Iran is no exception. This study aims to examine the optimal groundwater exploitation in three cropping years (2020–2021, 2021–2022, and 2022–2023) in a study of the Silakhor plain, Iran, by use of game theory. Game theory problems involve multidecision-making to address conflicting objectives. Thus, farmers and environmentalists were considered as game theory ‘players’ and their strategies were examined. Two groups of groundwater exploitation scenarios were considered based on both groundwater recharge and the current exploitation. Optimal groundwater exploitation was determined. The results of determining exploitation scenarios based on the current exploitation show that the optimal groundwater exploitation in the Silakhor plain is 103.9, 101, and 99 million m<sup>3</sup> in the next 3 years, respectively; these values decrease by 6.7, 7, and 7.4%, respectively, by determining exploitation scenarios based on groundwater recharge. The second major finding is that the farmers’ net benefit will increase by 18% by applying the optimal cropping pattern. Taken together, the results show that the design of the game structure is very important and the basis of the players’ strategies must be determined before using conflict resolution methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":13013,"journal":{"name":"Hydrogeology Journal","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrogeology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-024-02770-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The growing water demand and decreasing groundwater recharge have made groundwater management one of the most severe challenges in most countries of the world, and Iran is no exception. This study aims to examine the optimal groundwater exploitation in three cropping years (2020–2021, 2021–2022, and 2022–2023) in a study of the Silakhor plain, Iran, by use of game theory. Game theory problems involve multidecision-making to address conflicting objectives. Thus, farmers and environmentalists were considered as game theory ‘players’ and their strategies were examined. Two groups of groundwater exploitation scenarios were considered based on both groundwater recharge and the current exploitation. Optimal groundwater exploitation was determined. The results of determining exploitation scenarios based on the current exploitation show that the optimal groundwater exploitation in the Silakhor plain is 103.9, 101, and 99 million m3 in the next 3 years, respectively; these values decrease by 6.7, 7, and 7.4%, respectively, by determining exploitation scenarios based on groundwater recharge. The second major finding is that the farmers’ net benefit will increase by 18% by applying the optimal cropping pattern. Taken together, the results show that the design of the game structure is very important and the basis of the players’ strategies must be determined before using conflict resolution methods.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用博弈论研究确定地下水最佳开采量时参与者的策略
日益增长的用水需求和日益减少的地下水补给使地下水管理成为世界上大多数国家面临的最严峻挑战之一,伊朗也不例外。本研究旨在利用博弈论研究伊朗 Silakhor 平原三个种植年(2020-2021 年、2021-2022 年和 2022-2023 年)的最佳地下水开采。博弈论问题涉及解决目标冲突的多重决策。因此,农民和环保主义者被视为博弈论的 "参与者",并对他们的策略进行了研究。根据地下水补给和当前开采情况,考虑了两组地下水开采方案。确定了最佳地下水开采方案。根据当前开采情况确定开采方案的结果显示,未来 3 年 Silakhor 平原的最佳地下水开采量分别为 1.039 亿、1.01 亿和 0.99 亿立方米;根据地下水补给情况确定开采方案后,这些数值分别减少了 6.7%、7%和 7.4%。第二个主要发现是,采用最佳种植模式后,农民的净收益将增加 18%。综上所述,这些结果表明,博弈结构的设计非常重要,在使用冲突解决方法之前,必须确定博弈者的策略基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hydrogeology Journal
Hydrogeology Journal 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Hydrogeology Journal was founded in 1992 to foster understanding of hydrogeology; to describe worldwide progress in hydrogeology; and to provide an accessible forum for scientists, researchers, engineers, and practitioners in developing and industrialized countries. Since then, the journal has earned a large worldwide readership. Its peer-reviewed research articles integrate subsurface hydrology and geology with supporting disciplines: geochemistry, geophysics, geomorphology, geobiology, surface-water hydrology, tectonics, numerical modeling, economics, and sociology.
期刊最新文献
Characterising the discharge of hillslope karstic aquifers from hydrodynamic and physicochemical data (Sierra Seca, SE Spain) Delineating aquitard characteristics within a Silurian dolostone aquifer using high-density hydraulic head and fracture datasets Contribution of the time domain electromagnetic method to the study of the Kalahari transboundary multilayered aquifer systems in Southern Angola Where has hydrogeologic science been, and where is it going? Research trends in hydrogeology publishing over the past 60 years Emilio Custodio: a pioneer in groundwater management and key reference for hydrogeologists worldwide
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1