How does incorporating ChatGPT within a firm reinforce agility-mediated performance? The moderating role of innovation infusion and firms’ ethical identity

IF 11.1 1区 管理学 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Technovation Pub Date : 2024-02-20 DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2024.102975
Amir Talaei-Khoei, Alan T. Yang, Masialeti Masialeti
{"title":"How does incorporating ChatGPT within a firm reinforce agility-mediated performance? The moderating role of innovation infusion and firms’ ethical identity","authors":"Amir Talaei-Khoei,&nbsp;Alan T. Yang,&nbsp;Masialeti Masialeti","doi":"10.1016/j.technovation.2024.102975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The expansion of ChatGPT has sparked substantial discussions on the capabilities of generative artificial intelligence AI to profoundly reshape the business environment. However, empirical data on ChatGPT and its effects on firm performance are still lacking. In accordance with relevant literature, this study investigates the influence of ChatGPT-enabled agility, encompassing both operational and market facets, on firm performance. This work studies the moderating roles of innovative infusion of ChatGPT and ethical identity in the association between incorporating ChatGPT into standard processes with operational and market agilities. Data from a survey of IT executives were analyzed to validate our proposed hypotheses. We found that while the infusion of ChatGPT in an organization moderates the relationship between ChatGPT incorporation and operational agility, infusion does not significantly impact market agilities. In addition, we found that a firm's ethical identity moderates ChatGPT-enabled market agilities but not operational agility. We also found that both types of agility play mediating roles in improving firm performance. This study adds to the growing body of literature on dynamic capabilities by presenting and testing a theory on the influence of a firm's capability to incorporate ChatGPT on agility, firm performance, and the role of ChatGPT infusion and firm ethical identity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49444,"journal":{"name":"Technovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technovation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497224000257","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The expansion of ChatGPT has sparked substantial discussions on the capabilities of generative artificial intelligence AI to profoundly reshape the business environment. However, empirical data on ChatGPT and its effects on firm performance are still lacking. In accordance with relevant literature, this study investigates the influence of ChatGPT-enabled agility, encompassing both operational and market facets, on firm performance. This work studies the moderating roles of innovative infusion of ChatGPT and ethical identity in the association between incorporating ChatGPT into standard processes with operational and market agilities. Data from a survey of IT executives were analyzed to validate our proposed hypotheses. We found that while the infusion of ChatGPT in an organization moderates the relationship between ChatGPT incorporation and operational agility, infusion does not significantly impact market agilities. In addition, we found that a firm's ethical identity moderates ChatGPT-enabled market agilities but not operational agility. We also found that both types of agility play mediating roles in improving firm performance. This study adds to the growing body of literature on dynamic capabilities by presenting and testing a theory on the influence of a firm's capability to incorporate ChatGPT on agility, firm performance, and the role of ChatGPT infusion and firm ethical identity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将 ChatGPT 纳入企业内部如何加强以敏捷性为中介的绩效?创新注入和企业道德认同的调节作用
ChatGPT 的扩展引发了关于生成式人工智能 AI 能深刻重塑商业环境的大量讨论。然而,有关 ChatGPT 及其对企业绩效影响的实证数据仍然缺乏。根据相关文献,本研究探讨了由 ChatGPT 实现的敏捷性(包括运营和市场两个方面)对企业绩效的影响。这项工作研究了 ChatGPT 的创新注入和道德认同在将 ChatGPT 纳入标准流程与运营和市场敏捷性之间的关联中的调节作用。我们分析了对 IT 高管的调查数据,以验证我们提出的假设。我们发现,虽然 ChatGPT 在企业中的注入调节了 ChatGPT 的融入与运营敏捷性之间的关系,但注入对市场敏捷性并无显著影响。此外,我们还发现,企业的道德认同会调节 ChatGPT 所带来的市场敏捷性,但不会影响运营敏捷性。我们还发现,这两种敏捷性在提高企业绩效方面都起着中介作用。本研究提出并检验了关于企业整合 ChatGPT 的能力对敏捷性、企业绩效的影响以及 ChatGPT 注入和企业道德认同的作用的理论,为日益增多的动态能力方面的文献增添了新的内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Technovation
Technovation 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
11.20%
发文量
208
审稿时长
91 days
期刊介绍: The interdisciplinary journal Technovation covers various aspects of technological innovation, exploring processes, products, and social impacts. It examines innovation in both process and product realms, including social innovations like regulatory frameworks and non-economic benefits. Topics range from emerging trends and capital for development to managing technology-intensive ventures and innovation in organizations of different sizes. It also discusses organizational structures, investment strategies for science and technology enterprises, and the roles of technological innovators. Additionally, it addresses technology transfer between developing countries and innovation across enterprise, political, and economic systems.
期刊最新文献
Facilitator or figurehead? The impact of academician shareholder on corporate innovation: Evidence from China China's technological catch-up through foreign IP acquisitions: Disaggregating the effects of cross-national distance Editorial Board Resourcing radical innovation: Leveraging from the mainstream to create the newstream In-between identity work: Transcending boundaries in university-industry collaboration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1