COVID-19 vaccination in healthcare workers: Long-term benefits and protection

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY Central European Journal of Immunology Pub Date : 2024-01-10 DOI:10.5114/ceji.2023.134250
Joanna Szczepanek, Monika Skorupa, Joanna Jarkiewicz-Tretyn, Andrzej Tretyn
{"title":"COVID-19 vaccination in healthcare workers: Long-term benefits and protection","authors":"Joanna Szczepanek, Monika Skorupa, Joanna Jarkiewicz-Tretyn, Andrzej Tretyn","doi":"10.5114/ceji.2023.134250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<b>Introduction:</b><br/>This study aimed to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in healthcare workers by analyzing the population’s response to the vaccine after two years, based on anti-SARS-CoV-2 protein S antibody levels. Additionally, the study aimed to assess the impact of basic factors on antibody levels.<br/><br/><b>Material and methods:</b><br/>A total of 4,090 healthcare workers were included in the study, and their antibody levels were measured using ELISA to detect anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG). Statistical analysis was conducted to examine the influence of COVID-19 infection, vaccination status, and number of vaccine doses on antibody concentrations.<br/><br/><b>Results and Conclusion:</b><br/>The majority of participants (85.1%) received the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine, while a smaller percentage chose vector vaccines such as AstraZeneca and Johnson &amp; Johnson. The incidence of COVID-19 among vaccinated individuals was relatively low for all vaccines, confirming their effectiveness in preventing symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. The study observed variations in IgG antibody levels within the study population, with only 0.46% of individuals testing negative for the presence of antibodies. The average anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG values showed significant differences across consecutive 3-month periods following infection or vaccination, with a gradual decrease over time. Notably, the most significant changes in antibody levels were observed within the first 6 months (mean values ranged from 3647.11 BAU/ml to 2601.49 BAU/ml). Subsequently, minor fluctuations were observed, with mean antibody values hovering around 2000 BAU/ml. The differences between average anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG values between consecutive 3-month periods from disease onset were statistically significant.<br/><br/>","PeriodicalId":9694,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Immunology","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ceji.2023.134250","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction:
This study aimed to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in healthcare workers by analyzing the population’s response to the vaccine after two years, based on anti-SARS-CoV-2 protein S antibody levels. Additionally, the study aimed to assess the impact of basic factors on antibody levels.

Material and methods:
A total of 4,090 healthcare workers were included in the study, and their antibody levels were measured using ELISA to detect anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG). Statistical analysis was conducted to examine the influence of COVID-19 infection, vaccination status, and number of vaccine doses on antibody concentrations.

Results and Conclusion:
The majority of participants (85.1%) received the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine, while a smaller percentage chose vector vaccines such as AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson. The incidence of COVID-19 among vaccinated individuals was relatively low for all vaccines, confirming their effectiveness in preventing symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. The study observed variations in IgG antibody levels within the study population, with only 0.46% of individuals testing negative for the presence of antibodies. The average anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG values showed significant differences across consecutive 3-month periods following infection or vaccination, with a gradual decrease over time. Notably, the most significant changes in antibody levels were observed within the first 6 months (mean values ranged from 3647.11 BAU/ml to 2601.49 BAU/ml). Subsequently, minor fluctuations were observed, with mean antibody values hovering around 2000 BAU/ml. The differences between average anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG values between consecutive 3-month periods from disease onset were statistically significant.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医护人员接种 COVID-19 疫苗:长期益处和保护
导言:本研究旨在通过分析两年后人群对疫苗的反应(基于抗SARS-CoV-2蛋白S抗体水平),评估COVID-19疫苗接种在医护人员中的长期有效性。此外,该研究还旨在评估基本因素对抗体水平的影响。材料和方法:该研究共纳入了 4,090 名医护人员,并使用 ELISA 检测抗 SARS-CoV-2 免疫球蛋白 G (IgG) 来测量他们的抗体水平。结果与结论:大多数参与者(85.1%)接种了辉瑞/BioNTech 公司的疫苗,小部分人选择了阿斯利康和强生等载体疫苗。在所有疫苗中,COVID-19 在接种者中的发病率都相对较低,这证实了它们在预防无症状 SARS-CoV-2 感染方面的有效性。研究发现,研究人群中的 IgG 抗体水平存在差异,只有 0.46% 的人抗体检测呈阴性。抗 SARS-CoV-2 IgG 的平均值在感染或接种疫苗后连续 3 个月内有显著差异,随着时间的推移逐渐下降。值得注意的是,前 6 个月的抗体水平变化最为明显(平均值从 3647.11 BAU/ml 到 2601.49 BAU/ml)。随后,抗体水平略有波动,平均值徘徊在 2000 BAU/ml 左右。自发病起连续 3 个月的抗 SARS-CoV-2 IgG 平均值之间的差异具有统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Central European Journal of Immunology is a English-language quarterly aimed mainly at immunologists.
期刊最新文献
Notch signaling pathway-based classification of bladder cancer in relation to tumor immune infiltration Interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 2 promotes inflammatory reactions by activating the nuclear factor kappa-B signaling pathway in diabetic nephropathy Influence of blood sample storage and different types of anticoagulants on results of NK cytotoxicity tests COVID-19 vaccination in healthcare workers: Long-term benefits and protection Efficacy of IL-23 inhibitors and IL-12/23 inhibitors in the induction treatment of Crohn’s disease: A meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1