Bayesian sequential probability ratio test for vaccine efficacy trials

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-02-20 DOI:10.1007/s00180-024-01458-5
Erina Paul, Santosh Sutradhar, Jonathan Hartzel, Devan V. Mehrotra
{"title":"Bayesian sequential probability ratio test for vaccine efficacy trials","authors":"Erina Paul, Santosh Sutradhar, Jonathan Hartzel, Devan V. Mehrotra","doi":"10.1007/s00180-024-01458-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Designing vaccine efficacy (VE) trials often requires recruiting large numbers of participants when the diseases of interest have a low incidence. When developing novel vaccines, such as for COVID-19 disease, the plausible range of VE is quite large at the design stage. Thus, the number of events needed to demonstrate efficacy above a pre-defined regulatory threshold can be difficult to predict and the time needed to accrue the necessary events can often be long. Therefore, it is advantageous to evaluate the efficacy at earlier interim analysis in the trial to potentially allow the trials to stop early for overwhelming VE or futility. In such cases, incorporating interim analyses through the use of the sequential probability ratio test (SPRT) can be helpful to allow for multiple analyses while controlling for both type-I and type-II errors. In this article, we propose a Bayesian SPRT for designing a vaccine trial for comparing a test vaccine with a control assuming two Poisson incidence rates. We provide guidance on how to choose the prior distribution and how to optimize the number of events for interim analyses to maximize the efficiency of the design. Through simulations, we demonstrate how the proposed Bayesian SPRT performs better when compared with the corresponding frequentist SPRT. An R repository to implement the proposed method is placed at: https://github.com/Merck/bayesiansprt.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-024-01458-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Designing vaccine efficacy (VE) trials often requires recruiting large numbers of participants when the diseases of interest have a low incidence. When developing novel vaccines, such as for COVID-19 disease, the plausible range of VE is quite large at the design stage. Thus, the number of events needed to demonstrate efficacy above a pre-defined regulatory threshold can be difficult to predict and the time needed to accrue the necessary events can often be long. Therefore, it is advantageous to evaluate the efficacy at earlier interim analysis in the trial to potentially allow the trials to stop early for overwhelming VE or futility. In such cases, incorporating interim analyses through the use of the sequential probability ratio test (SPRT) can be helpful to allow for multiple analyses while controlling for both type-I and type-II errors. In this article, we propose a Bayesian SPRT for designing a vaccine trial for comparing a test vaccine with a control assuming two Poisson incidence rates. We provide guidance on how to choose the prior distribution and how to optimize the number of events for interim analyses to maximize the efficiency of the design. Through simulations, we demonstrate how the proposed Bayesian SPRT performs better when compared with the corresponding frequentist SPRT. An R repository to implement the proposed method is placed at: https://github.com/Merck/bayesiansprt.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
疫苗效力试验的贝叶斯序列概率比检验
当相关疾病的发病率较低时,设计疫苗效力(VE)试验往往需要招募大量参与者。在开发新型疫苗(如 COVID-19 疾病)时,在设计阶段 VE 的合理范围相当大。因此,要证明疗效超过预先设定的监管阈值所需的事件数量可能难以预测,而积累必要事件所需的时间往往很长。因此,在试验的早期中期分析中对疗效进行评估是很有好处的,这样有可能使试验因VE过高或无效而提前结束。在这种情况下,通过使用序贯概率比检验(SPRT)进行中期分析有助于进行多重分析,同时控制 I 型和 II 型误差。在本文中,我们提出了一种贝叶斯概率比检验方法,用于设计疫苗试验,在假设两种泊松发病率的情况下比较试验疫苗和对照疫苗。我们就如何选择先验分布以及如何优化中期分析的事件数以最大限度地提高设计效率提供了指导。通过模拟,我们展示了所提出的贝叶斯 SPRT 与相应的频数 SPRT 相比如何表现得更好。实现所提方法的 R 代码库位于:https://github.com/Merck/bayesiansprt。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Management of Cholesteatoma: Hearing Rehabilitation. Congenital Cholesteatoma. Evaluation of Cholesteatoma. Management of Cholesteatoma: Extension Beyond Middle Ear/Mastoid. Recidivism and Recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1