Body composition assessment for sarcopenic obesity and 3-year mortality in older adults: A comparison study

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-02-23 DOI:10.1002/jpen.2613
Yavuz Sultan Selim Akgul MD, Sibel Akin MD, Burcu Eren Cengiz MD, Derya Kocaslan MD, Nurhayat Tugra Ozer PhD
{"title":"Body composition assessment for sarcopenic obesity and 3-year mortality in older adults: A comparison study","authors":"Yavuz Sultan Selim Akgul MD,&nbsp;Sibel Akin MD,&nbsp;Burcu Eren Cengiz MD,&nbsp;Derya Kocaslan MD,&nbsp;Nurhayat Tugra Ozer PhD","doi":"10.1002/jpen.2613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>There is no universally accepted definition of sarcopenic obesity (SO), and its prevalence is ambiguous. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of SO in older adults based on different definitions and determine which predicts all-cause mortality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This prospective longitudinal follow-up study included outpatients aged ≥60 years. SO was defined by sarcopenia definition based on the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2) criteria plus obesity. Three different methods were used to define obesity. Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, waist circumference (WC) ≥ 102 cm for men and ≥88.0 cm for women, and body fat percentage (BF%) ≥ 37.3% for men and ≥51.1% for women. Different definitions of SO and their mortality predictions were compared.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The median age of the 584 patients in the study was 70.0 (interquartile range, 66.0–76.0) years. The prevalence of sarcopenia was 38.5% (47.5% in men and 35.7% in women). The prevalence of SO based on BMI, WC, and BF% was 15.3%, 16.4%, and 10.5%, respectively. The mortality rate was 6.7%. SO based on BMI (odds ratio [OR], 2.73; 95% CI, 1.12–17.9; <i>P</i> = 0.024) and BF% (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.19–3.02; <i>P</i> = 0.007) were significantly associated with 3-year mortality after adjusting for the confounding variables of age, sex, and number of comorbidities. SO based on WC was not associated with mortality (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.07–1.27; <i>P</i> = 0.104).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The use of BF% and BMI for defining SO is appropriate in outpatient older adults.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jpen.2613","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

There is no universally accepted definition of sarcopenic obesity (SO), and its prevalence is ambiguous. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of SO in older adults based on different definitions and determine which predicts all-cause mortality.

Methods

This prospective longitudinal follow-up study included outpatients aged ≥60 years. SO was defined by sarcopenia definition based on the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2) criteria plus obesity. Three different methods were used to define obesity. Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2, waist circumference (WC) ≥ 102 cm for men and ≥88.0 cm for women, and body fat percentage (BF%) ≥ 37.3% for men and ≥51.1% for women. Different definitions of SO and their mortality predictions were compared.

Results

The median age of the 584 patients in the study was 70.0 (interquartile range, 66.0–76.0) years. The prevalence of sarcopenia was 38.5% (47.5% in men and 35.7% in women). The prevalence of SO based on BMI, WC, and BF% was 15.3%, 16.4%, and 10.5%, respectively. The mortality rate was 6.7%. SO based on BMI (odds ratio [OR], 2.73; 95% CI, 1.12–17.9; P = 0.024) and BF% (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.19–3.02; P = 0.007) were significantly associated with 3-year mortality after adjusting for the confounding variables of age, sex, and number of comorbidities. SO based on WC was not associated with mortality (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.07–1.27; P = 0.104).

Conclusion

The use of BF% and BMI for defining SO is appropriate in outpatient older adults.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对老年人肌肉疏松性肥胖和 3 年死亡率的身体成分评估:对比研究
背景:肌肉疏松性肥胖(SO)没有公认的定义,其患病率也不明确。本研究旨在根据不同的定义调查老年人肌肉疏松性肥胖的患病率,并确定哪种定义可预测全因死亡率:这项前瞻性纵向随访研究纳入了年龄≥60 岁的门诊患者。SO是根据欧洲老年人肌肉疏松症工作组2(EWGSOP2)标准加上肥胖症定义的肌肉疏松症。肥胖的定义有三种不同的方法。体重指数(BMI)≥30 kg/m2,男性腰围≥102 cm,女性腰围≥88.0 cm,男性体脂率≥37.3%,女性体脂率≥51.1%。对SO的不同定义及其死亡率预测进行了比较:研究中 584 名患者的中位年龄为 70.0 岁(四分位距为 66.0-76.0 岁)。肌肉疏松症的发病率为 38.5%(男性为 47.5%,女性为 35.7%)。根据体重指数(BMI)、腹围(WC)和脂肪率(BF%)计算,肌肉疏松症的发病率分别为 15.3%、16.4% 和 10.5%。死亡率为 6.7%。在调整了年龄、性别和合并症数量等混杂变量后,基于体重指数(OR,2.73;95% CI,1.12-17.9;P = 0.024)和BF%(OR,1.43;95% CI,1.19-3.02;P = 0.007)的SO与3年死亡率显著相关。结论:基于腹围的 SO 与死亡率无关(OR,0.78;95% CI,0.07-1.27;P = 0.104):结论:在门诊老年人中,使用BF%和BMI来定义SO是合适的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊最新文献
Hyperbaric oxygen treatment promotes tendon-bone interface healing in a rabbit model of rotator cuff tears. Oxygen-ozone therapy for myocardial ischemic stroke and cardiovascular disorders. Comparative study on the anti-inflammatory and protective effects of different oxygen therapy regimens on lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice. Heme oxygenase/carbon monoxide system and development of the heart. Hyperbaric oxygen for moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: outcomes 5-8 years after injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1