Cognitive Signatures of Depressive and Anhedonic Symptoms and Affective States Using Computational Modeling and Neurocognitive Testing

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES Biological Psychiatry-Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.02.005
Nadja R. Ging-Jehli , Manuel Kuhn , Jacob M. Blank , Pranavan Chanthrakumar , David C. Steinberger , Zeyang Yu , Todd M. Herrington , Daniel G. Dillon , Diego A. Pizzagalli , Michael J. Frank
{"title":"Cognitive Signatures of Depressive and Anhedonic Symptoms and Affective States Using Computational Modeling and Neurocognitive Testing","authors":"Nadja R. Ging-Jehli ,&nbsp;Manuel Kuhn ,&nbsp;Jacob M. Blank ,&nbsp;Pranavan Chanthrakumar ,&nbsp;David C. Steinberger ,&nbsp;Zeyang Yu ,&nbsp;Todd M. Herrington ,&nbsp;Daniel G. Dillon ,&nbsp;Diego A. Pizzagalli ,&nbsp;Michael J. Frank","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Deeper phenotyping may improve our understanding of depression. Because depression is heterogeneous, extracting cognitive signatures associated with severity of depressive symptoms, anhedonia, and affective states is a promising approach.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Sequential sampling models decomposed behavior from an adaptive approach-avoidance conflict task into computational parameters quantifying latent cognitive signatures. Fifty unselected participants completed clinical scales and the approach-avoidance conflict task by either approaching or avoiding trials offering monetary rewards and electric shocks.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Decision dynamics were best captured by a sequential sampling model with linear collapsing boundaries varying by net offer values, and with drift rates varying by trial-specific reward and aversion, reflecting net evidence accumulation toward approach or avoidance. Unlike conventional behavioral measures, these computational parameters revealed distinct associations with self-reported symptoms. Specifically, passive avoidance tendencies, indexed by starting point biases, were associated with greater severity of depressive symptoms (<em>R</em> = 0.34, <em>p</em> = .019) and anhedonia (<em>R</em> = 0.49, <em>p</em> = .001). Depressive symptoms were also associated with slower encoding and response execution, indexed by nondecision time (<em>R</em> = 0.37, <em>p</em> = .011). Higher reward sensitivity for offers with negative net values, indexed by drift rates, was linked to more sadness (<em>R</em> = 0.29, <em>p</em> = .042) and lower positive affect (<em>R</em> = −0.33, <em>p</em> = .022). Conversely, higher aversion sensitivity was associated with more tension (<em>R</em> = 0.33, <em>p</em> = .025). Finally, less cautious response patterns, indexed by boundary separation, were linked to more negative affect (<em>R</em> = −0.40, <em>p</em> = .005).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We demonstrated the utility of multidimensional computational phenotyping, which could be applied to clinical samples to improve characterization and treatment selection.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54231,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychiatry-Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging","volume":"9 7","pages":"Pages 726-736"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychiatry-Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451902224000569","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Deeper phenotyping may improve our understanding of depression. Because depression is heterogeneous, extracting cognitive signatures associated with severity of depressive symptoms, anhedonia, and affective states is a promising approach.

Methods

Sequential sampling models decomposed behavior from an adaptive approach-avoidance conflict task into computational parameters quantifying latent cognitive signatures. Fifty unselected participants completed clinical scales and the approach-avoidance conflict task by either approaching or avoiding trials offering monetary rewards and electric shocks.

Results

Decision dynamics were best captured by a sequential sampling model with linear collapsing boundaries varying by net offer values, and with drift rates varying by trial-specific reward and aversion, reflecting net evidence accumulation toward approach or avoidance. Unlike conventional behavioral measures, these computational parameters revealed distinct associations with self-reported symptoms. Specifically, passive avoidance tendencies, indexed by starting point biases, were associated with greater severity of depressive symptoms (R = 0.34, p = .019) and anhedonia (R = 0.49, p = .001). Depressive symptoms were also associated with slower encoding and response execution, indexed by nondecision time (R = 0.37, p = .011). Higher reward sensitivity for offers with negative net values, indexed by drift rates, was linked to more sadness (R = 0.29, p = .042) and lower positive affect (R = −0.33, p = .022). Conversely, higher aversion sensitivity was associated with more tension (R = 0.33, p = .025). Finally, less cautious response patterns, indexed by boundary separation, were linked to more negative affect (R = −0.40, p = .005).

Conclusions

We demonstrated the utility of multidimensional computational phenotyping, which could be applied to clinical samples to improve characterization and treatment selection.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用计算建模和神经认知测试研究抑郁症状、厌世症状和情感状态的认知特征。
背景:更深入的表型分析可提高我们对抑郁症的认识。由于抑郁症具有异质性,因此提取与抑郁症状严重程度、失乐症和情感状态相关的认知特征是一种很有前景的方法:方法:序列抽样模型(SSM)将适应性接近-回避冲突(AAC)任务中的行为分解为量化潜在认知特征的计算参数。50 名未入选的参与者通过接近或回避提供金钱奖励和电击的试验,完成了临床量表和 AAC 任务:SSM能最好地捕捉决策动态,它的线性折叠边界随净提议值的变化而变化,漂移率随特定试验的奖励和厌恶而变化,反映了接近或回避的净证据积累。与传统的行为测量方法不同,这些计算参数揭示了与自我报告症状之间的明显关联。具体来说,以起点偏差为指标的被动回避倾向与更严重的抑郁症状(R=0.34,p=0.019)和失乐症(R=0.49,p=0.001)相关。抑郁症状还与较慢的编码和反应执行速度(以非决策时间为指标)相关(R=0.37,p=0.011)。以漂移率为指标,对负净值提议的奖赏敏感性越高,则越悲伤(R=0.29,p=0.042),积极情绪越低(R=-0.33,p=0.022)。相反,厌恶敏感度越高,紧张感越强(R=0.33,p=0.025)。最后,以边界分离为指标的较不谨慎的反应模式与较多的负面情绪相关(R=-0.40,p=0.005):我们展示了多维计算表型的实用性,它可应用于临床样本,以改善特征描述和治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
1.70%
发文量
247
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging is an official journal of the Society for Biological Psychiatry, whose purpose is to promote excellence in scientific research and education in fields that investigate the nature, causes, mechanisms, and treatments of disorders of thought, emotion, or behavior. In accord with this mission, this peer-reviewed, rapid-publication, international journal focuses on studies using the tools and constructs of cognitive neuroscience, including the full range of non-invasive neuroimaging and human extra- and intracranial physiological recording methodologies. It publishes both basic and clinical studies, including those that incorporate genetic data, pharmacological challenges, and computational modeling approaches. The journal publishes novel results of original research which represent an important new lead or significant impact on the field. Reviews and commentaries that focus on topics of current research and interest are also encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents In This Issue Peak Alpha Frequency in Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder, and Healthy Volunteers: Associations With Visual Information Processing and Cognition Macrostructural Brain Morphology as Moderator of the Relationship Between Pandemic-Related Stress and Internalizing Symptomology During COVID-19 in High-Risk Adolescents Impairment of Visual Fixation and Preparatory Saccade Control in Borderline Personality Disorder With and Without Comorbid Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1