On the rocks: Biogeography and floristic identity of rocky ecosystems in eastern South America

IF 3.7 1区 生物学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Journal of Systematics and Evolution Pub Date : 2024-02-22 DOI:10.1111/jse.13052
Luísa Azevedo, Daniela Cristina Zappi, Daniela Melo Garcia de Oliveira, Leila Meyer, Eimear Nic Lughadha, Rosie Clegg, Leonardo Dias Meireles, Pablo Hendrigo Alves de Melo, R. Toby Pennington, Danilo M. Neves
{"title":"On the rocks: Biogeography and floristic identity of rocky ecosystems in eastern South America","authors":"Luísa Azevedo, Daniela Cristina Zappi, Daniela Melo Garcia de Oliveira, Leila Meyer, Eimear Nic Lughadha, Rosie Clegg, Leonardo Dias Meireles, Pablo Hendrigo Alves de Melo, R. Toby Pennington, Danilo M. Neves","doi":"10.1111/jse.13052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The geodiversity of rocky ecosystems includes diverse plant communities with specific names, but their continental‐scale floristic identity and the knowledge on the role of macroclimate remain patchy. Here, we assessed the identity of plant communities in eastern Brazil across multiple types of rocky landscapes and evaluated the relative importance of climatic variables in constraining floristic differentiation. We provided lists of diagnostic species and an assessment of the conservation status of the identified floristic groups. We compiled a data set of 151 sites (4498 species) from rocky ecosystems, including <jats:italic>campos rupestres, campos de altitude</jats:italic>, granitic‐gneiss lowland inselbergs, and limestone outcrops. We used unsupervised clustering analysis followed by ANOSIM to assess floristic groups among sites. We performed a random forest variable selection to test whether the identified floristic groups occupy distinct climatic spaces. Six groups (lithobiomes) segregated floristically according to lithology and climate. Alongside <jats:italic>campos de altitude</jats:italic> and limestone outcrops, inselbergs were divided according to the biome in which they occur (Atlantic Forest or Caatinga), and <jats:italic>campos rupestres</jats:italic> were largely segregated according to their lithological matrix (ironstone or quartzitic). Plant communities of Caatinga inselbergs were more similar to limestone outcrops, while Atlantic Forest inselbergs communities resembled <jats:italic>campos de altitude</jats:italic>. The composition of plant communities on outcrops seems to be largely constrained by lithology, but climatic factors are also meaningful for sites with similar lithology. The current network of protected areas does not cover these unique ecosystems and their floristic heterogeneity, with Caatinga inselbergs and limestone outcrops being the least protected.","PeriodicalId":17087,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Systematics and Evolution","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Systematics and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jse.13052","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The geodiversity of rocky ecosystems includes diverse plant communities with specific names, but their continental‐scale floristic identity and the knowledge on the role of macroclimate remain patchy. Here, we assessed the identity of plant communities in eastern Brazil across multiple types of rocky landscapes and evaluated the relative importance of climatic variables in constraining floristic differentiation. We provided lists of diagnostic species and an assessment of the conservation status of the identified floristic groups. We compiled a data set of 151 sites (4498 species) from rocky ecosystems, including campos rupestres, campos de altitude, granitic‐gneiss lowland inselbergs, and limestone outcrops. We used unsupervised clustering analysis followed by ANOSIM to assess floristic groups among sites. We performed a random forest variable selection to test whether the identified floristic groups occupy distinct climatic spaces. Six groups (lithobiomes) segregated floristically according to lithology and climate. Alongside campos de altitude and limestone outcrops, inselbergs were divided according to the biome in which they occur (Atlantic Forest or Caatinga), and campos rupestres were largely segregated according to their lithological matrix (ironstone or quartzitic). Plant communities of Caatinga inselbergs were more similar to limestone outcrops, while Atlantic Forest inselbergs communities resembled campos de altitude. The composition of plant communities on outcrops seems to be largely constrained by lithology, but climatic factors are also meaningful for sites with similar lithology. The current network of protected areas does not cover these unique ecosystems and their floristic heterogeneity, with Caatinga inselbergs and limestone outcrops being the least protected.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
岩石上南美洲东部岩石生态系统的生物地理学和植物学特征
岩石生态系统的地质多样性包括具有特定名称的多种植物群落,但其大陆尺度的植物特征和对宏观气候作用的了解仍然零散。在这里,我们评估了巴西东部多种类型岩石景观中植物群落的特征,并评估了气候变量在制约植物分化方面的相对重要性。我们提供了诊断物种清单,并对已确定的植物群落的保护状况进行了评估。我们编制了一个包含 151 个地点(4498 个物种)的数据集,这些地点来自岩石生态系统,包括大裂谷(campos rupestres)、高地裂谷(campos de altitude)、花岗岩-片麻岩低地岛礁(granitic-gneiss lowland inselbergs)和石灰岩露头(limestone outcrops)。我们使用无监督聚类分析,然后使用 ANOSIM 评估不同地点之间的植物群组。我们进行了随机森林变量选择,以检验已确定的植物群是否占据了不同的气候空间。根据岩性和气候,我们划分出了六个植物群组(lithobiomes)。除了海拔营地和石灰岩露头外,海岛还根据其所在的生物群落(大西洋森林或卡廷加)进行了划分,而破裂营地则主要根据其岩性基质(铁质岩或石英岩)进行了划分。卡廷加高原的植物群落与石灰岩露头更为相似,而大西洋森林高原的植物群落则与海拔高度营地相似。露头植物群落的组成似乎在很大程度上受到岩性的制约,但气候因素对于岩性相似的地点也很重要。目前的保护区网络并没有覆盖这些独特的生态系统及其植物异质性,其中卡廷加海岛和石灰岩露头受到的保护最少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Systematics and Evolution
Journal of Systematics and Evolution Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
1368
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Systematics and Evolution (JSE, since 2008; formerly Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica) is a plant-based international journal newly dedicated to the description and understanding of the biological diversity. It covers: description of new taxa, monographic revision, phylogenetics, molecular evolution and genome evolution, evolutionary developmental biology, evolutionary ecology, population biology, conservation biology, biogeography, paleobiology, evolutionary theories, and related subjects.
期刊最新文献
A new stem‐group mantispoid lineage (Insecta: Neuroptera) equipped with unique raptorial structures from the Middle Jurassic of China Geographic patterns and climatic drivers of phylogenetic structure of liverworts along a long elevational gradient in the central Himalaya Phylogenetic diversity and interspecies competition shaped species diversity in adaptive radiated Ligustrum (Oleaceae) Cenozoic Ampelopsis and Nekemias leaves (Vitaceae, Ampelopsideae) from Eurasia: Paleobiogeographic and paleoclimatic implications A phylogenomic approach to disentangling the evolution of the large and diverse daisy tribe Anthemideae (Asteraceae)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1