Investigating the relevance of the advanced activities of daily living tool for the screening and diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment and dementia to the Sub-Saharan African migrant population in Belgium: A qualitative focus group study

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION British Journal of Occupational Therapy Pub Date : 2024-01-31 DOI:10.1177/03080226231213215
Mary Edna J Lamnteh, Ellen Gorus, Van De Velde Dominique, Njemini Rose, De Vriendt Patricia
{"title":"Investigating the relevance of the advanced activities of daily living tool for the screening and diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment and dementia to the Sub-Saharan African migrant population in Belgium: A qualitative focus group study","authors":"Mary Edna J Lamnteh, Ellen Gorus, Van De Velde Dominique, Njemini Rose, De Vriendt Patricia","doi":"10.1177/03080226231213215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction:Early diagnosis of dementia is partly based on the evaluation of the basic (b-), instrumental (i-) and advanced (a-) activities of daily living (ADL). Adapting the item content of assessment tools to maintain relevance, understanding, and equivalence of the items and scales across other groups is pertinent. However, there are limited assessment tools developed on or adapted for use on the growing older Sub-Saharan African (SSA) migrant population in Europe. Focusing on the item content, we evaluated the relevance of the advanced activities of daily living (a-ADL) tool to the older SSA migrant population in Belgium.Method:Two focus group discussions were organized with participants from the SSA community in Gent, Belgium. Relevant, irrelevant, unclear, and new items were identified. The data was analyzed through the inductive method while consensus agreements were used to arrive at refined themes.Results:Out of the 49 items on the tool, both groups unanimously agreed that 15 items were relevant and 23 irrelevant. Thirteen new items were identified, whereas 15 items were considered unclear.Conclusion:Participants agreed the tool was relevant but should be adapted. Verification and validation of these results in a larger SSA older migrant population in Belgium is strongly recommended.","PeriodicalId":49096,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03080226231213215","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction:Early diagnosis of dementia is partly based on the evaluation of the basic (b-), instrumental (i-) and advanced (a-) activities of daily living (ADL). Adapting the item content of assessment tools to maintain relevance, understanding, and equivalence of the items and scales across other groups is pertinent. However, there are limited assessment tools developed on or adapted for use on the growing older Sub-Saharan African (SSA) migrant population in Europe. Focusing on the item content, we evaluated the relevance of the advanced activities of daily living (a-ADL) tool to the older SSA migrant population in Belgium.Method:Two focus group discussions were organized with participants from the SSA community in Gent, Belgium. Relevant, irrelevant, unclear, and new items were identified. The data was analyzed through the inductive method while consensus agreements were used to arrive at refined themes.Results:Out of the 49 items on the tool, both groups unanimously agreed that 15 items were relevant and 23 irrelevant. Thirteen new items were identified, whereas 15 items were considered unclear.Conclusion:Participants agreed the tool was relevant but should be adapted. Verification and validation of these results in a larger SSA older migrant population in Belgium is strongly recommended.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查高级日常生活活动工具在筛查和诊断轻度认知障碍和痴呆症方面与比利时撒哈拉以南非洲移民人口的相关性:焦点小组定性研究
导言:痴呆症的早期诊断部分基于对基本(b-)、工具性(i-)和高级(a-)日常生活活动(ADL)的评估。对评估工具的项目内容进行调整,以保持项目和量表在其他群体中的相关性、理解性和等效性是非常重要的。然而,针对欧洲日益增长的撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)老年移民群体开发或改编的评估工具十分有限。方法:我们组织了两次焦点小组讨论,参与者来自比利时根特的 SSA 社区。确定了相关、不相关、不明确和新的项目。结果:在工具的 49 个项目中,两个小组一致认为 15 个项目相关,23 个项目不相关。结论:参与者一致认为该工具是相关的,但应加以调整。强烈建议在比利时更多的 SSA 老年移民中验证和确认这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
15.40%
发文量
81
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: British Journal of Occupational Therapy (BJOT) is the official journal of the Royal College of Occupational Therapists. Its purpose is to publish articles with international relevance that advance knowledge in research, practice, education, and management in occupational therapy. It is a monthly peer reviewed publication that disseminates evidence on the effectiveness, benefit, and value of occupational therapy so that occupational therapists, service users, and key stakeholders can make informed decisions. BJOT publishes research articles, reviews, practice analyses, opinion pieces, editorials, letters to the editor and book reviews. It also regularly publishes special issues on topics relevant to occupational therapy.
期刊最新文献
Daily living skills in adolescents with and without language disorder, measured using the WHEEL OF INDEPENDENCETM framework Class of international functioning disability and health core sets for autism spectrum disorder: Occupational therapists’ perspective Exploring the usefulness of real-time digitally supported fatigue monitoring in fatigue management: Perspectives from occupational therapists and brain injury survivors Mindset and participation: Correlations among healthy children Exploration of collaborative goal setting in occupational therapy for adults with aphasia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1