Biology teaching that develops the metacognitive aspect of learning: How to learn competence

I. Labak, Ivona Maruncek, S. Blažetić
{"title":"Biology teaching that develops the metacognitive aspect of learning: How to learn competence","authors":"I. Labak, Ivona Maruncek, S. Blažetić","doi":"10.20448/jeelr.v11i1.5395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Higher-order thinking and metacognition are closely related and are part of learning to develop competence. The goal of this research was to determine the practice of teaching biology that develops metacognition and evaluate whether teachers require specific professional training for this purpose or if broader cognitive-focused training can also enhance metacognitive development in students. The original Teaching Observation Form (TOF) has been adapted for research objectives.  A survey was designed to capture the subjective perspectives of 292 students and their teachers regarding metacognition development. Additionally, the research involved six biology teachers who were professionally trained in a program focused on higher-order thinking. The survey results indicate a self-assessed good teaching practice for the development of metacognition. However, analysis of the first lesson's video recordings showed that some components had been eliminated from biology classes which hindered students' ability to develop metacognition. Although higher-order thinking and metacognition are interconnected phenomena, professional development training focuses solely on higher-order thinking whose impact we established through analysis of other lessons does not induce the necessary positive changes for the comprehensive development of metacognition in students. In a nutshell, explicit professional development programs aimed at fostering metacognitive awareness among teachers need to be designed. These programs should instruct teachers on how to model the development of metacognition in students through their teaching.","PeriodicalId":36689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and e-Learning Research","volume":"39 34","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and e-Learning Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v11i1.5395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Higher-order thinking and metacognition are closely related and are part of learning to develop competence. The goal of this research was to determine the practice of teaching biology that develops metacognition and evaluate whether teachers require specific professional training for this purpose or if broader cognitive-focused training can also enhance metacognitive development in students. The original Teaching Observation Form (TOF) has been adapted for research objectives.  A survey was designed to capture the subjective perspectives of 292 students and their teachers regarding metacognition development. Additionally, the research involved six biology teachers who were professionally trained in a program focused on higher-order thinking. The survey results indicate a self-assessed good teaching practice for the development of metacognition. However, analysis of the first lesson's video recordings showed that some components had been eliminated from biology classes which hindered students' ability to develop metacognition. Although higher-order thinking and metacognition are interconnected phenomena, professional development training focuses solely on higher-order thinking whose impact we established through analysis of other lessons does not induce the necessary positive changes for the comprehensive development of metacognition in students. In a nutshell, explicit professional development programs aimed at fostering metacognitive awareness among teachers need to be designed. These programs should instruct teachers on how to model the development of metacognition in students through their teaching.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
培养学习元认知的生物教学:如何学习能力
高阶思维和元认知密切相关,是学习能力培养的一部分。本研究的目标是确定培养元认知的生物教学实践,并评估教师是否需要为此目的进行专门的专业培训,或者更广泛的以认知为重点的培训是否也能促进学生的元认知发展。根据研究目标,对原有的教学观察表(TOF)进行了调整。 研究设计了一项调查,以了解 292 名学生及其教师对元认知发展的主观看法。此外,研究还涉及六名生物教师,他们都接受过以高阶思维为重点的专业培训。调查结果表明,在元认知发展方面,自我评估的教学实践是良好的。然而,对第一节课录像的分析表明,生物课上取消了一些环节,这阻碍了学生发展元认知的能力。虽然高阶思维和元认知是相互关联的现象,但专业发展培训只侧重于高阶思维,而我们通过分析其他课程所确定的高阶思维的影响并不能引起学生元认知全面发展所需的积极变化。总之,需要设计明确的专业发展计划,旨在培养教师的元认知意识。这些项目应指导教师如何通过教学示范学生元认知的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Developing a model for life skills training through the enhancement of academic, personal, social, and career competencies for middle school students Psychosocial barriers to promoting self-directed and autonomous learning: The perception of students and lecturers in Malaysia Teachers’ perceptions, attitudes and knowledge of online learning for students with disabilities in Saudi Arabia Moving beyond the challenges of learning through technologies: The current status of ICT integration in South African schools Biology teaching that develops the metacognitive aspect of learning: How to learn competence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1