{"title":"Robustness of remediation measures against liquefaction induced manhole uplift under mainshock-aftershock sequence","authors":"Zhiyong Zhang , Siau Chen Chian","doi":"10.1016/j.sandf.2024.101439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Earthquakes generally consist of one mainshock and subsequent aftershocks. Although effects of aftershocks following the mainshock on surface structures has been studied extensively, similar studies on underground structures are rarely reported in the literature. With the fast advances in underground space development, robustness of remediation measures against underground structures uplift induced by soil liquefaction shall be examined to ensure their functioning subject to not only the mainshock but also the subsequent aftershocks. This paper studies the uplift behaviour of a conventional manhole subjected to the mainshock-aftershock sequence. It was found that, in the ground that becomes liquefied during the mainshock, manholes become more vulnerable when faced with aftershocks. Due to this reason, some of the previously proposed remediation measures, such as increasing the manholes’ self-weight, roughening the sidewalls, were examined using centrifuge modeling in this study. It was found that such measures had little effect in the aftershocks despite their effectiveness in the precedent mainshock. In contrast, the methods that mitigates manhole uplift by enhancing the manhole’s base permeability, demonstrated better performance in the aftershock than in the mainshock, indicating its promising application potential in future mitigation design.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21857,"journal":{"name":"Soils and Foundations","volume":"64 2","pages":"Article 101439"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038080624000179/pdfft?md5=c85f362a5a8d079607632180965a9798&pid=1-s2.0-S0038080624000179-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soils and Foundations","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038080624000179","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Earthquakes generally consist of one mainshock and subsequent aftershocks. Although effects of aftershocks following the mainshock on surface structures has been studied extensively, similar studies on underground structures are rarely reported in the literature. With the fast advances in underground space development, robustness of remediation measures against underground structures uplift induced by soil liquefaction shall be examined to ensure their functioning subject to not only the mainshock but also the subsequent aftershocks. This paper studies the uplift behaviour of a conventional manhole subjected to the mainshock-aftershock sequence. It was found that, in the ground that becomes liquefied during the mainshock, manholes become more vulnerable when faced with aftershocks. Due to this reason, some of the previously proposed remediation measures, such as increasing the manholes’ self-weight, roughening the sidewalls, were examined using centrifuge modeling in this study. It was found that such measures had little effect in the aftershocks despite their effectiveness in the precedent mainshock. In contrast, the methods that mitigates manhole uplift by enhancing the manhole’s base permeability, demonstrated better performance in the aftershock than in the mainshock, indicating its promising application potential in future mitigation design.
期刊介绍:
Soils and Foundations is one of the leading journals in the field of soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering. It is the official journal of the Japanese Geotechnical Society (JGS)., The journal publishes a variety of original research paper, technical reports, technical notes, as well as the state-of-the-art reports upon invitation by the Editor, in the fields of soil and rock mechanics, geotechnical engineering, and environmental geotechnics. Since the publication of Volume 1, No.1 issue in June 1960, Soils and Foundations will celebrate the 60th anniversary in the year of 2020.
Soils and Foundations welcomes theoretical as well as practical work associated with the aforementioned field(s). Case studies that describe the original and interdisciplinary work applicable to geotechnical engineering are particularly encouraged. Discussions to each of the published articles are also welcomed in order to provide an avenue in which opinions of peers may be fed back or exchanged. In providing latest expertise on a specific topic, one issue out of six per year on average was allocated to include selected papers from the International Symposia which were held in Japan as well as overseas.