Automated machine learning-based model for the prediction of pedicle screw loosening after degenerative lumbar fusion surgery.

IF 5.7 4区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY Bioscience trends Pub Date : 2024-03-19 Epub Date: 2024-02-27 DOI:10.5582/bst.2023.01327
Feng Jiang, Xinxin Li, Lei Liu, Zhiyang Xie, Xiaotao Wu, Yuntao Wang
{"title":"Automated machine learning-based model for the prediction of pedicle screw loosening after degenerative lumbar fusion surgery.","authors":"Feng Jiang, Xinxin Li, Lei Liu, Zhiyang Xie, Xiaotao Wu, Yuntao Wang","doi":"10.5582/bst.2023.01327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The adequacy of screw anchorage is a critical factor in achieving successful spinal fusion. This study aimed to use machine learning algorithms to identify critical variables and predict pedicle screw loosening after degenerative lumbar fusion surgery. A total of 552 patients who underwent primary transpedicular lumbar fixation for lumbar degenerative disease were included. The LASSO method identified key features associated with pedicle screw loosening. Patient clinical characteristics, intraoperative variables, and radiographic parameters were collected and used to construct eight machine learning models, including a training set (80% of participants) and a test set (20% of participants). The XGBoost model exhibited the best performance, with an AUC of 0.884 (95% CI: 0.825-0.944) in the test set, along with the lowest Brier score. Ten crucial variables, including age, disease diagnosis: degenerative scoliosis, number of fused levels, fixation to S1, HU value, preoperative PT, preoperative PI-LL, postoperative LL, postoperative PT, and postoperative PI-LL were selected. In the prospective cohort, the XGBoost model demonstrated substantial performance with an accuracy of 83.32%. This study identified crucial variables associated with pedicle screw loosening after degenerative lumbar fusion surgery and successfully developed a machine learning model to predict pedicle screw loosening. The findings of this study may provide valuable information for clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":8957,"journal":{"name":"Bioscience trends","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioscience trends","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5582/bst.2023.01327","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The adequacy of screw anchorage is a critical factor in achieving successful spinal fusion. This study aimed to use machine learning algorithms to identify critical variables and predict pedicle screw loosening after degenerative lumbar fusion surgery. A total of 552 patients who underwent primary transpedicular lumbar fixation for lumbar degenerative disease were included. The LASSO method identified key features associated with pedicle screw loosening. Patient clinical characteristics, intraoperative variables, and radiographic parameters were collected and used to construct eight machine learning models, including a training set (80% of participants) and a test set (20% of participants). The XGBoost model exhibited the best performance, with an AUC of 0.884 (95% CI: 0.825-0.944) in the test set, along with the lowest Brier score. Ten crucial variables, including age, disease diagnosis: degenerative scoliosis, number of fused levels, fixation to S1, HU value, preoperative PT, preoperative PI-LL, postoperative LL, postoperative PT, and postoperative PI-LL were selected. In the prospective cohort, the XGBoost model demonstrated substantial performance with an accuracy of 83.32%. This study identified crucial variables associated with pedicle screw loosening after degenerative lumbar fusion surgery and successfully developed a machine learning model to predict pedicle screw loosening. The findings of this study may provide valuable information for clinical decision-making.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于机器学习的椎弓根螺钉松动自动预测模型,用于预测退行性腰椎融合手术后的椎弓根螺钉松动。
螺钉固定是否充分是脊柱融合术能否成功的关键因素。本研究旨在利用机器学习算法识别关键变量,预测退行性腰椎融合手术后椎弓根螺钉松动的情况。研究共纳入了552名因腰椎退行性疾病接受原发性经椎管腰椎固定术的患者。LASSO方法确定了与椎弓根螺钉松动相关的主要特征。收集的患者临床特征、术中变量和放射学参数被用于构建八个机器学习模型,包括一个训练集(80%的参与者)和一个测试集(20%的参与者)。XGBoost 模型表现最佳,测试集的 AUC 为 0.884(95% CI:0.825-0.944),Brier 评分最低。研究人员选择了十个关键变量,包括年龄、疾病诊断:退行性脊柱侧凸、融合水平数、S1固定、HU值、术前PT、术前PI-LL、术后LL、术后PT和术后PI-LL。在前瞻性队列中,XGBoost 模型的准确率高达 83.32%,表现出了卓越的性能。本研究确定了退行性腰椎融合手术后与椎弓根螺钉松动相关的关键变量,并成功开发了一个机器学习模型来预测椎弓根螺钉松动。该研究结果可为临床决策提供有价值的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
1.80%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BioScience Trends (Print ISSN 1881-7815, Online ISSN 1881-7823) is an international peer-reviewed journal. BioScience Trends devotes to publishing the latest and most exciting advances in scientific research. Articles cover fields of life science such as biochemistry, molecular biology, clinical research, public health, medical care system, and social science in order to encourage cooperation and exchange among scientists and clinical researchers.
期刊最新文献
Financial inclusion and financial gerontology in Japan's aging society. How spousal cognitive functioning affects the level of depression in middle-aged and older adults: An instrumental variable study based on CHARLS in China. Effect and mechanism of Hashimoto thyroiditis on female infertility: A clinical trial, bioinformatics analysis, and experiments-based study. The role of cholesterol-modified prognostic nutritional index in nutritional status assessment and predicting survival after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. SEC24C suppresses the propagation and chemoresistance of hepatocellular carcinoma by promoting unfolded protein response-related apoptosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1