Importance of vaginal packing after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy - retrospective study.

IF 0.5 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.48095/cccg202411
Adéla Marinič Veverková, Vladimír Kališ, Martin Smažinka, Martin Havíř, Zdeněk Rušavý
{"title":"Importance of vaginal packing after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy - retrospective study.","authors":"Adéla Marinič Veverková, Vladimír Kališ, Martin Smažinka, Martin Havíř, Zdeněk Rušavý","doi":"10.48095/cccg202411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the subjective and objective results of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) with and without the introduction of a vaginal packing one year after surgery. Methodology: This is a retrospective cohort study of 125 women after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy operated on in 2013-2016 with complete annual follow-up. Patients with a total hysterectomy were excluded from the study. Basic patient characteristics, preoperative POP-Q and surgery data were collected. The subjective outcome of the surgery was assessed using the PGI-I (patient global impression of improvement). The anatomic outcome of the surgery was evaluated using the composite definition of surgical failure based on POP-Q (Ba ≥ -1, C ≥ -3, Bp ≥ -1). Patients were divided into two groups according to whether or not they had vaginal packing after surgery. Statistical analysis was performed using c2, Wilcoxon and Fischer test according to the distribution of normality. Results: A total of 125 women were enrolled in the study; 48 (38.4%) after LSC, 58 (46.4%) with concomitant supracervical hysterectomy and 19 (15.2%) after sacrohysterocolpopexy. Vaginal packing was introduced for 24-48 hours after surgery in 86 (68.8%) women. The groups did not differ in age, body mass index, smoking or preoperative pelvic organ prolapse quantification system. We did not observe statistically significant differences in PGI-I first year after surgery. The difference in anatomic surgical failure did not reach statistical significance, although more failures were observed in the group without packing (12.8 vs. 3.5%; P = 0.09). The mean C-point value one year after surgery was lower in the non-tamponade group (-7 vs. -7.5; P &lt; 0.009). No mesh extrusion or serious complications were recorded in the monitored group. Conclusion: Vaginal packing after LSC probably does not affect patient satisfaction after surgery, however, it may be associated with better anatomical outcome one year after the surgery. The results of the study must be confirmed by a more detailed prospective evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":43333,"journal":{"name":"Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology","volume":"89 1","pages":"11-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48095/cccg202411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the subjective and objective results of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) with and without the introduction of a vaginal packing one year after surgery. Methodology: This is a retrospective cohort study of 125 women after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy operated on in 2013-2016 with complete annual follow-up. Patients with a total hysterectomy were excluded from the study. Basic patient characteristics, preoperative POP-Q and surgery data were collected. The subjective outcome of the surgery was assessed using the PGI-I (patient global impression of improvement). The anatomic outcome of the surgery was evaluated using the composite definition of surgical failure based on POP-Q (Ba ≥ -1, C ≥ -3, Bp ≥ -1). Patients were divided into two groups according to whether or not they had vaginal packing after surgery. Statistical analysis was performed using c2, Wilcoxon and Fischer test according to the distribution of normality. Results: A total of 125 women were enrolled in the study; 48 (38.4%) after LSC, 58 (46.4%) with concomitant supracervical hysterectomy and 19 (15.2%) after sacrohysterocolpopexy. Vaginal packing was introduced for 24-48 hours after surgery in 86 (68.8%) women. The groups did not differ in age, body mass index, smoking or preoperative pelvic organ prolapse quantification system. We did not observe statistically significant differences in PGI-I first year after surgery. The difference in anatomic surgical failure did not reach statistical significance, although more failures were observed in the group without packing (12.8 vs. 3.5%; P = 0.09). The mean C-point value one year after surgery was lower in the non-tamponade group (-7 vs. -7.5; P < 0.009). No mesh extrusion or serious complications were recorded in the monitored group. Conclusion: Vaginal packing after LSC probably does not affect patient satisfaction after surgery, however, it may be associated with better anatomical outcome one year after the surgery. The results of the study must be confirmed by a more detailed prospective evaluation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜骶骨整形术后阴道填料的重要性--回顾性研究。
目的 比较腹腔镜骶尾部结肠切除术(LSC)术后一年使用和不使用阴道填料的主观和客观效果。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究:这是一项回顾性队列研究,对 2013-2016 年期间接受腹腔镜骶骨整形术的 125 名女性进行了完整的年度随访。研究不包括全子宫切除术患者。研究收集了患者的基本特征、术前 POP-Q 和手术数据。手术的主观结果采用 PGI-I(患者总体改善印象)进行评估。手术解剖结果采用基于POP-Q的手术失败综合定义(Ba≥-1,C≥-3,Bp≥-1)进行评估。根据术后是否进行阴道填塞将患者分为两组。根据正态分布采用c2、Wilcoxon和Fischer检验进行统计分析。结果共有 125 名妇女参加了研究,其中 48 人(38.4%)在 LSC 术后,58 人(46.4%)同时进行了宫颈上口切除术,19 人(15.2%)在骶尾部结肠切除术后。86名(68.8%)妇女在术后24-48小时内使用了阴道填料。两组患者在年龄、体重指数、吸烟或术前盆腔器官脱垂量化系统方面没有差异。我们没有观察到术后第一年 PGI-I 的统计学差异。解剖手术失败率的差异未达到统计学意义,但未填料组的失败率更高(12.8% 对 3.5%;P = 0.09)。无填塞组术后一年的平均C点值较低(-7 vs. -7.5;P < 0.009)。监测组未出现网片挤压或严重并发症。结论LSC 术后阴道填塞可能不会影响患者术后的满意度,但可能与术后一年后更好的解剖结果有关。研究结果必须通过更详细的前瞻性评估来证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology
Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
57
期刊最新文献
Birth plan - legal and medical aspects. Discrepancies in staging and perioperative classification of pelvic endometriosis according to #Enzian 2021. Female orgasm, reproduction and couple relationships. Importance of vaginal packing after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy - retrospective study. New recommendations for informing patients and gamete donors in assisted reproduction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1