Pandemic fear and psychological resilience in pregnant women after the pandemic - a study in Turkey.

IF 0.5 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.48095/cccg202422
Merve Akkuş, Fatih Akkuş
{"title":"Pandemic fear and psychological resilience in pregnant women after the pandemic - a study in Turkey.","authors":"Merve Akkuş, Fatih Akkuş","doi":"10.48095/cccg202422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the levels of pandemic-related fear, depression, stress and anxiety in pregnant women in different trimesters after the pandemic and to examine their relationship with psychological resilience. Methods: A total of 250 women were included in the study, including 125 pregnant women and 125 healthy controls. The participants were divided into three groups according to their trimester of pregnancy. The Depression-Anxiety-Stress Scale 21 (DASS-21), the Epidemic Disease Anxiety Scale (EDAS) and the Short Psychological Resilience Scale (SPRS) were used to measure depression, anxiety, stress and psychological resilience. Results: Pregnant women had significantly higher DASS-21 total scores [19 (4-42) ] than healthy controls [11 (1-42) ], P = 0.001. The prevalence of depression, anxiety and stress was 23.2%, 44% and 20% respectively in pregnant women compared to 12.8%, 31.2% and 9.6% in healthy controls. DASS-21 total scores were highest in the 1st (21.2 ± 5.8) and 3rd (22.8 ± 8.9) trimesters and lowest in the 2nd (16.1 ± 6.9) trimesters. The DASS-21 total score was positively correlated with the EDAS total score and the pandemic perception subscale. SPRS total score was negatively correlated with anxiety, stress and DASS-21 total score. Conclusion: Pregnant women experienced higher levels of depression, anxiety, stress, and pandemic anxiety than non-pregnant women in the post-pandemic period. Psychological resilience was negatively associated with depression, anxiety, and stress in pregnant women. These findings indicate that the pandemic negatively affects the mental health of pregnant women and the importance of providing psychological support services to protect their mental health.</p>","PeriodicalId":43333,"journal":{"name":"Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology","volume":"89 1","pages":"22-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48095/cccg202422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study was to investigate the levels of pandemic-related fear, depression, stress and anxiety in pregnant women in different trimesters after the pandemic and to examine their relationship with psychological resilience. Methods: A total of 250 women were included in the study, including 125 pregnant women and 125 healthy controls. The participants were divided into three groups according to their trimester of pregnancy. The Depression-Anxiety-Stress Scale 21 (DASS-21), the Epidemic Disease Anxiety Scale (EDAS) and the Short Psychological Resilience Scale (SPRS) were used to measure depression, anxiety, stress and psychological resilience. Results: Pregnant women had significantly higher DASS-21 total scores [19 (4-42) ] than healthy controls [11 (1-42) ], P = 0.001. The prevalence of depression, anxiety and stress was 23.2%, 44% and 20% respectively in pregnant women compared to 12.8%, 31.2% and 9.6% in healthy controls. DASS-21 total scores were highest in the 1st (21.2 ± 5.8) and 3rd (22.8 ± 8.9) trimesters and lowest in the 2nd (16.1 ± 6.9) trimesters. The DASS-21 total score was positively correlated with the EDAS total score and the pandemic perception subscale. SPRS total score was negatively correlated with anxiety, stress and DASS-21 total score. Conclusion: Pregnant women experienced higher levels of depression, anxiety, stress, and pandemic anxiety than non-pregnant women in the post-pandemic period. Psychological resilience was negatively associated with depression, anxiety, and stress in pregnant women. These findings indicate that the pandemic negatively affects the mental health of pregnant women and the importance of providing psychological support services to protect their mental health.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大流行后孕妇的恐惧和心理复原力--土耳其的一项研究。
目的:本研究旨在调查大流行后不同孕期孕妇与大流行相关的恐惧、抑郁、压力和焦虑水平,并研究它们与心理复原力之间的关系。研究方法研究共纳入 250 名妇女,包括 125 名孕妇和 125 名健康对照者。根据怀孕三个月将参与者分为三组。采用抑郁-焦虑-压力量表 21(DASS-21)、流行病焦虑量表(EDAS)和简易心理复原力量表(SPRS)来测量抑郁、焦虑、压力和心理复原力。结果显示孕妇的 DASS-21 总分[19(4-42)]明显高于健康对照组[11(1-42)],P = 0.001。孕妇抑郁、焦虑和压力的发生率分别为 23.2%、44% 和 20%,而健康对照组的发生率分别为 12.8%、31.2% 和 9.6%。DASS-21总分在怀孕三个月中最高(21.2 ± 5.8)和最低(22.8 ± 8.9),在怀孕三个月中最低(16.1 ± 6.9)。DASS-21 总分与 EDAS 总分和大流行病感知分量表呈正相关。SPRS 总分与焦虑、压力和 DASS-21 总分呈负相关。结论与非孕妇相比,孕妇在大流行后的抑郁、焦虑、压力和大流行焦虑程度更高。孕妇的心理复原力与抑郁、焦虑和压力呈负相关。这些研究结果表明,大流行会对孕妇的心理健康产生负面影响,因此提供心理支持服务以保护她们的心理健康非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology
Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
57
期刊最新文献
Birth plan - legal and medical aspects. Discrepancies in staging and perioperative classification of pelvic endometriosis according to #Enzian 2021. Female orgasm, reproduction and couple relationships. Importance of vaginal packing after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy - retrospective study. New recommendations for informing patients and gamete donors in assisted reproduction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1