Crossover can guarantee exponential speed-ups in evolutionary multi-objective optimisation

IF 5.1 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Artificial Intelligence Pub Date : 2024-02-27 DOI:10.1016/j.artint.2024.104098
Duc-Cuong Dang, Andre Opris, Dirk Sudholt
{"title":"Crossover can guarantee exponential speed-ups in evolutionary multi-objective optimisation","authors":"Duc-Cuong Dang,&nbsp;Andre Opris,&nbsp;Dirk Sudholt","doi":"10.1016/j.artint.2024.104098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Evolutionary algorithms are popular algorithms for multi-objective optimisation (also called Pareto optimisation) as they use a population to store trade-offs between different objectives. Despite their popularity, the theoretical foundation of multi-objective evolutionary optimisation (EMO) is still in its early development. Fundamental questions such as the benefits of the crossover operator are still not fully understood. We provide a theoretical analysis of the well-known EMO algorithms GSEMO and NSGA-II to showcase the possible advantages of crossover: we propose classes of “royal road” functions on which these algorithms cover the whole Pareto front in expected polynomial time if crossover is being used. But when disabling crossover, they require exponential time in expectation to cover the Pareto front. The latter even holds for a large class of black-box algorithms using any elitist selection and any unbiased mutation operator. Moreover, even the expected time to create a single Pareto-optimal search point is exponential. We provide two different function classes, one tailored for one-point crossover and another one tailored for uniform crossover, and we show that some immune-inspired hypermutations cannot avoid exponential optimisation times. Our work shows the first example of an exponential performance gap through the use of crossover for the widely used NSGA-II algorithm and contributes to a deeper understanding of its limitations and capabilities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8434,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence","volume":"330 ","pages":"Article 104098"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004370224000341/pdfft?md5=3dde17723b9eeb078cc6d03de8fc345f&pid=1-s2.0-S0004370224000341-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004370224000341","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evolutionary algorithms are popular algorithms for multi-objective optimisation (also called Pareto optimisation) as they use a population to store trade-offs between different objectives. Despite their popularity, the theoretical foundation of multi-objective evolutionary optimisation (EMO) is still in its early development. Fundamental questions such as the benefits of the crossover operator are still not fully understood. We provide a theoretical analysis of the well-known EMO algorithms GSEMO and NSGA-II to showcase the possible advantages of crossover: we propose classes of “royal road” functions on which these algorithms cover the whole Pareto front in expected polynomial time if crossover is being used. But when disabling crossover, they require exponential time in expectation to cover the Pareto front. The latter even holds for a large class of black-box algorithms using any elitist selection and any unbiased mutation operator. Moreover, even the expected time to create a single Pareto-optimal search point is exponential. We provide two different function classes, one tailored for one-point crossover and another one tailored for uniform crossover, and we show that some immune-inspired hypermutations cannot avoid exponential optimisation times. Our work shows the first example of an exponential performance gap through the use of crossover for the widely used NSGA-II algorithm and contributes to a deeper understanding of its limitations and capabilities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
交叉能保证进化多目标优化的指数级速度提升
进化算法是多目标优化(也称帕累托优化)的常用算法,因为它们使用群体来存储不同目标之间的权衡。尽管进化算法很受欢迎,但多目标进化优化(EMO)的理论基础仍处于早期发展阶段。诸如交叉算子的益处等基本问题仍未得到充分理解。我们对著名的多目标进化优化算法 GSEMO 和 NSGA-II 进行了理论分析,以展示交叉的可能优势:我们提出了 "皇道 "函数的类别,在这些函数上,如果使用交叉,这些算法可以在预期的多项式时间内覆盖整个帕累托前沿。但如果不使用交叉,它们需要指数级的预期时间才能覆盖帕累托前沿。后者甚至适用于使用任何精英选择和无偏突变算子的一大类黑盒算法。此外,即使创建一个帕累托最优搜索点的预期时间也是指数级的。我们提供了两种不同的函数类别,一种是为单点交叉量身定制的,另一种是为均匀交叉量身定制的,我们还证明了一些受免疫启发的超突变无法避免指数级优化时间。我们的研究首次展示了通过对广泛使用的 NSGA-II 算法使用交叉而产生指数级性能差距的实例,有助于加深对其局限性和能力的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Artificial Intelligence
Artificial Intelligence 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.40%
发文量
118
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Artificial Intelligence (AIJ) welcomes papers covering a broad spectrum of AI topics, including cognition, automated reasoning, computer vision, machine learning, and more. Papers should demonstrate advancements in AI and propose innovative approaches to AI problems. Additionally, the journal accepts papers describing AI applications, focusing on how new methods enhance performance rather than reiterating conventional approaches. In addition to regular papers, AIJ also accepts Research Notes, Research Field Reviews, Position Papers, Book Reviews, and summary papers on AI challenges and competitions.
期刊最新文献
Lifted action models learning from partial traces Human-AI coevolution Editorial Board Separate but equal: Equality in belief propagation for single-cycle graphs Generative models for grid-based and image-based pathfinding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1