Examining competition among airline regarding route portfolios at domestic hubs under government regulation: The case of China's aviation market

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q2 TRANSPORTATION Journal of Air Transport Management Pub Date : 2024-02-29 DOI:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2024.102567
Yue Hu , Liang Dai , Kurt Fuellhart , Frank Witlox
{"title":"Examining competition among airline regarding route portfolios at domestic hubs under government regulation: The case of China's aviation market","authors":"Yue Hu ,&nbsp;Liang Dai ,&nbsp;Kurt Fuellhart ,&nbsp;Frank Witlox","doi":"10.1016/j.jairtraman.2024.102567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Numerous studies have explored airline competition on routes, with a limited focus on competition in route portfolios at hub airports. Route control regulations influence this competition. This study proposes a theoretical framework for examining airline competition in route portfolios at regulated hub airports, using the Chinese market as a case. The Chinese market, characterized by strict government regulations, has seen substantial passenger traffic growth. Considering the historical airline network structure as a key evaluation criterion in China's regulations, we examine the impact of airline network structures on this competition. Findings reveal distinct airline network types: <em>Mature, Hub-led, Direct-flight-led, Direct-flight-expansion, Hub-cultivation, and Initial</em>. <em>Mature and Hub-cultivation</em> networks are associated with establishing numerous routes at airports with fewer competitor hubs. However, <em>Mature</em> airlines also dominate airports with significant competitor hubs. <em>Hub-led, Direct-flight-led</em>, and <em>Direct-flight-expansion</em> networks tend to establish many routes at airports with substantial competitor hubs, while <em>Initial</em> networks do not exhibit such competition. Aviation policy and company decisions significantly influence airline competitive positions at hub airports.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14925,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Air Transport Management","volume":"116 ","pages":"Article 102567"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Air Transport Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969699724000322","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Numerous studies have explored airline competition on routes, with a limited focus on competition in route portfolios at hub airports. Route control regulations influence this competition. This study proposes a theoretical framework for examining airline competition in route portfolios at regulated hub airports, using the Chinese market as a case. The Chinese market, characterized by strict government regulations, has seen substantial passenger traffic growth. Considering the historical airline network structure as a key evaluation criterion in China's regulations, we examine the impact of airline network structures on this competition. Findings reveal distinct airline network types: Mature, Hub-led, Direct-flight-led, Direct-flight-expansion, Hub-cultivation, and Initial. Mature and Hub-cultivation networks are associated with establishing numerous routes at airports with fewer competitor hubs. However, Mature airlines also dominate airports with significant competitor hubs. Hub-led, Direct-flight-led, and Direct-flight-expansion networks tend to establish many routes at airports with substantial competitor hubs, while Initial networks do not exhibit such competition. Aviation policy and company decisions significantly influence airline competitive positions at hub airports.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究政府监管下航空公司在国内枢纽航线组合方面的竞争:中国航空市场案例
许多研究探讨了航空公司在航线上的竞争,但对枢纽机场航线组合竞争的关注有限。航线管制条例影响着这种竞争。本研究以中国市场为例,提出了研究航空公司在管制枢纽机场的航线组合竞争的理论框架。中国市场的特点是政府管制严格,但客流量却大幅增长。考虑到历史上的航空公司网络结构是中国监管中的一个关键评价标准,我们研究了航空公司网络结构对这种竞争的影响。研究结果揭示了不同的航空公司网络类型:成熟型、枢纽主导型、直飞主导型、直飞扩张型、枢纽培育型和初始型。成熟型和枢纽培育型网络与在竞争枢纽较少的机场建立众多航线有关。不过,成熟型航空公司也会在竞争对手枢纽较多的机场占据主导地位。枢纽主导型网络、直飞主导型网络和直飞扩张型网络倾向于在拥有大量竞争对手枢纽的机场建立许多航线,而初始网络则不表现出这种竞争。航空政策和公司决策对航空公司在枢纽机场的竞争地位有重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
11.70%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: The Journal of Air Transport Management (JATM) sets out to address, through high quality research articles and authoritative commentary, the major economic, management and policy issues facing the air transport industry today. It offers practitioners and academics an international and dynamic forum for analysis and discussion of these issues, linking research and practice and stimulating interaction between the two. The refereed papers in the journal cover all the major sectors of the industry (airlines, airports, air traffic management) as well as related areas such as tourism management and logistics. Papers are blind reviewed, normally by two referees, chosen for their specialist knowledge. The journal provides independent, original and rigorous analysis in the areas of: • Policy, regulation and law • Strategy • Operations • Marketing • Economics and finance • Sustainability
期刊最新文献
Stochastic infection risk models for aircraft seat assignment considering passenger vaccination status and seat location Addressing the impact of airport pricing, investment and operations on greenhouse gas emissions Editorial Board A privacy-preserving federated learning approach for airline upgrade optimization Exploring prediction accuracy for optimal taxi times in airport operations using various machine learning models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1