A novel slot optimization model for congested airports integrating IATA priority and operational priority

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q2 TRANSPORTATION Journal of Air Transport Management Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2025.102751
Weili Zeng , Changxing Xu , Xiang Shu , Xinyuan Chen , Wenbin Wei
{"title":"A novel slot optimization model for congested airports integrating IATA priority and operational priority","authors":"Weili Zeng ,&nbsp;Changxing Xu ,&nbsp;Xiang Shu ,&nbsp;Xinyuan Chen ,&nbsp;Wenbin Wei","doi":"10.1016/j.jairtraman.2025.102751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Worldwide Slot Guidelines (WSG) are currently widely adopted for airport slot demand management. In some busy airports, coordinators are responsible for allocating slots according to the priority order outlined by the WSG. Particularly, historical slots with the highest priority should be directly allocated to the airline carrier holding that slot in the following same season. However, when airport capacity decreases, there may be situations where historical priority slots cannot be met, rendering the existing allocation guidelines ineffective. Currently, no research considers this situation. To complement the existing coordination priority, this paper first defines a new priority category from an operational perspective, referred to as operational priority. Furthermore, a weighted dual-objective slot optimization model is constructed, integrating both coordination priority and operational priority within the same optimization model framework. A constraint-based hierarchical search strategy is adopted to find the optimal results for different priority slots. Applying the model to Shanghai Pudong International Airport (ZSPD) in China, experimental results show that the proposed model can effectively meet the requests of airlines, with a slot adjustment amount of only 3.15% and a maximum displacement of fewer than 40 min. Since the proposed model considers operational priority, the optimized results regarding temporal and spatial distribution are more reasonable, effectively reducing flight delays and improving operational efficiency.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14925,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Air Transport Management","volume":"124 ","pages":"Article 102751"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Air Transport Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969699725000134","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Worldwide Slot Guidelines (WSG) are currently widely adopted for airport slot demand management. In some busy airports, coordinators are responsible for allocating slots according to the priority order outlined by the WSG. Particularly, historical slots with the highest priority should be directly allocated to the airline carrier holding that slot in the following same season. However, when airport capacity decreases, there may be situations where historical priority slots cannot be met, rendering the existing allocation guidelines ineffective. Currently, no research considers this situation. To complement the existing coordination priority, this paper first defines a new priority category from an operational perspective, referred to as operational priority. Furthermore, a weighted dual-objective slot optimization model is constructed, integrating both coordination priority and operational priority within the same optimization model framework. A constraint-based hierarchical search strategy is adopted to find the optimal results for different priority slots. Applying the model to Shanghai Pudong International Airport (ZSPD) in China, experimental results show that the proposed model can effectively meet the requests of airlines, with a slot adjustment amount of only 3.15% and a maximum displacement of fewer than 40 min. Since the proposed model considers operational priority, the optimized results regarding temporal and spatial distribution are more reasonable, effectively reducing flight delays and improving operational efficiency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
11.70%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: The Journal of Air Transport Management (JATM) sets out to address, through high quality research articles and authoritative commentary, the major economic, management and policy issues facing the air transport industry today. It offers practitioners and academics an international and dynamic forum for analysis and discussion of these issues, linking research and practice and stimulating interaction between the two. The refereed papers in the journal cover all the major sectors of the industry (airlines, airports, air traffic management) as well as related areas such as tourism management and logistics. Papers are blind reviewed, normally by two referees, chosen for their specialist knowledge. The journal provides independent, original and rigorous analysis in the areas of: • Policy, regulation and law • Strategy • Operations • Marketing • Economics and finance • Sustainability
期刊最新文献
Unlocking efficiency and environmental impact: Analyzing concessioned Brazilian airports A dynamic control method for airport ground movement optimization considering adaptive traffic situation and data-driven conflict priority A novel slot optimization model for congested airports integrating IATA priority and operational priority A new tool for robust aircraft routing: Superior Robust Aircraft Routing (sup-RAR) A combined approach using structural equation modeling and analytic hierarchy process in hub airports selection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1