Expecting the Unexpected: Infants Use Others' Surprise to Revise Their Own Expectations.

Q1 Social Sciences Open Mind Pub Date : 2024-03-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1162/opmi_a_00117
Yang Wu, Megan Merrick, Hyowon Gweon
{"title":"Expecting the Unexpected: Infants Use Others' Surprise to Revise Their Own Expectations.","authors":"Yang Wu, Megan Merrick, Hyowon Gweon","doi":"10.1162/opmi_a_00117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human infants show systematic responses to events that violate their expectations. Can they also revise these expectations based on others' expressions of surprise? Here we ask whether infants (<i>N</i> = 156, mean = 15.2 months, range: 12.0-18.0 months) can use an experimenter's expression of surprise to revise their own expectations about statistically probable vs. improbable events. An experimenter sampled a ball from a box of red and white balls and briefly displayed either a surprised or an unsurprised expression at the outcome before revealing it to the infant. Following an unsurprised expression, the results were consistent with prior work; infants looked longer at a statistically improbable outcome than a probable outcome. Following a surprised expression, however, this standard pattern disappeared or was even reversed. These results suggest that even before infants can observe the unexpected events themselves, they can use others' surprise to <i>expect the unexpected</i>. Starting early in life, human learners can leverage social information that signals others' prediction error to update their own predictions.</p>","PeriodicalId":32558,"journal":{"name":"Open Mind","volume":"8 ","pages":"67-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10898783/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Mind","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/opmi_a_00117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human infants show systematic responses to events that violate their expectations. Can they also revise these expectations based on others' expressions of surprise? Here we ask whether infants (N = 156, mean = 15.2 months, range: 12.0-18.0 months) can use an experimenter's expression of surprise to revise their own expectations about statistically probable vs. improbable events. An experimenter sampled a ball from a box of red and white balls and briefly displayed either a surprised or an unsurprised expression at the outcome before revealing it to the infant. Following an unsurprised expression, the results were consistent with prior work; infants looked longer at a statistically improbable outcome than a probable outcome. Following a surprised expression, however, this standard pattern disappeared or was even reversed. These results suggest that even before infants can observe the unexpected events themselves, they can use others' surprise to expect the unexpected. Starting early in life, human learners can leverage social information that signals others' prediction error to update their own predictions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
期待意外:婴儿利用他人的惊讶来修正自己的期望。
人类婴儿会对违反其预期的事件做出系统的反应。他们是否也能根据他人的惊讶表达来修正这些预期呢?在此,我们询问婴儿(N = 156,平均 = 15.2 个月,范围:12.0-18.0 个月)能否利用实验者的惊讶表情来修正他们自己对统计上可能发生与不可能发生事件的预期。实验者从一个装有红球和白球的盒子中抽取一个球,并在将结果展示给婴儿之前短暂地表现出惊讶或不惊讶的表情。在婴儿表现出不惊讶的表情时,实验结果与之前的研究结果一致;婴儿看统计上不可能出现的结果的时间比看可能出现的结果的时间长。然而,当婴儿表现出惊讶的表情时,这种标准模式消失了,甚至发生了逆转。这些结果表明,甚至在婴儿自己观察到意外事件之前,他们就能利用他人的惊讶来预期意外。从生命的早期开始,人类学习者就可以利用提示他人预测错误的社会信息来更新自己的预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Mind
Open Mind Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊最新文献
Approximating Human-Level 3D Visual Inferences With Deep Neural Networks. Prosodic Cues Support Inferences About the Question's Pedagogical Intent. The Double Standard of Ownership. Combination and Differentiation Theories of Categorization: A Comparison Using Participants' Categorization Descriptions. Investigating Sensitivity to Shared Information and Personal Experience in Children's Use of Majority Information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1