Pub Date : 2025-12-18eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1162/OPMI.a.320
Kate McCurdy, Timothy J O'Donnell, Adam Lopez, Sharon Goldwater
Researchers generally assume that speakers use the linguistic information available to them. For instance, if one grammatical category robustly predicts another grammatical category, we expect speakers to reproduce this conditional relationship during language production. Here, we investigate this assumption for grammatical gender in German. Gender is the single cue which most strongly predicts the plural class of existing German nouns, but behavioral studies with novel nouns have found mixed results regarding the role of gender in plural generalization. Across three experiments, we examine how individual German speakers use grammatical gender when producing plural forms of novel nouns. We find that most speakers effectively ignore gender during plural class production, even under experimental manipulations that encourage them to attend to this cue. These results point toward an underexplored direction in cognitive science: accounting for the linguistic information that speakers do not use.
{"title":"Most German Speakers Ignore the Cue That Best Predicts Plural Class.","authors":"Kate McCurdy, Timothy J O'Donnell, Adam Lopez, Sharon Goldwater","doi":"10.1162/OPMI.a.320","DOIUrl":"10.1162/OPMI.a.320","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Researchers generally assume that speakers use the linguistic information available to them. For instance, if one grammatical category robustly predicts another grammatical category, we expect speakers to reproduce this conditional relationship during language production. Here, we investigate this assumption for grammatical gender in German. Gender is the single cue which most strongly predicts the plural class of existing German nouns, but behavioral studies with novel nouns have found mixed results regarding the role of gender in plural generalization. Across three experiments, we examine how individual German speakers use grammatical gender when producing plural forms of novel nouns. We find that most speakers effectively ignore gender during plural class production, even under experimental manipulations that encourage them to attend to this cue. These results point toward an underexplored direction in cognitive science: accounting for the linguistic information that speakers do not use.</p>","PeriodicalId":32558,"journal":{"name":"Open Mind","volume":"9 ","pages":"2175-2204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12768555/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145912824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-18eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1162/OPMI.a.275
Maayan Keshev, Kaiva Hinkle, Matthew Wagers, Brian Dillon
Syntactic dependency formation in comprehension is subject to retrieval interference that occurs when comprehenders need to activate stored information in memory to form and interpret a linguistic dependency. For example, retrieving a subject phrase to attach it to the verb might result in agreement attraction errors. It remains unclear whether this interference arises as part of routine dependency formation or as part of a repair mechanism that is activated when predictive dependency formation fails (e.g., Wagers et al., 2009). For example, it has been argued that reflexive anaphors resist attraction in comprehension because number/gender features of unpredictable elements are not associated with a strong 'prediction error' signal that might trigger retrieval-based and error-prone repair processes (Parker & Phillips, 2017). We test a version of the "Error-driven Retrieval" hypothesis by examining the interaction between reflexive attraction and the predictability of the anaphor. In two reading time experiments and one offline interpretation experiment, we find that the predictability of a reflexive dependency does not modulate its susceptibility to interference effects in comprehension. We propose that attraction is better captured as part of routine retrieval processes and that the (in)sensitivity of reflexives to structurally irrelevant distractors should be explained through other mechanisms.
{"title":"Predictability of the Retrieval Site Does Not Modulate Interference: Evidence From Reflexive Attraction.","authors":"Maayan Keshev, Kaiva Hinkle, Matthew Wagers, Brian Dillon","doi":"10.1162/OPMI.a.275","DOIUrl":"10.1162/OPMI.a.275","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Syntactic dependency formation in comprehension is subject to retrieval interference that occurs when comprehenders need to activate stored information in memory to form and interpret a linguistic dependency. For example, retrieving a subject phrase to attach it to the verb might result in agreement attraction errors. It remains unclear whether this interference arises as part of routine dependency formation or as part of a repair mechanism that is activated when predictive dependency formation fails (e.g., Wagers et al., 2009). For example, it has been argued that reflexive anaphors resist attraction in comprehension because number/gender features of unpredictable elements are not associated with a strong 'prediction error' signal that might trigger retrieval-based and error-prone repair processes (Parker & Phillips, 2017). We test a version of the \"Error-driven Retrieval\" hypothesis by examining the interaction between reflexive attraction and the predictability of the anaphor. In two reading time experiments and one offline interpretation experiment, we find that the predictability of a reflexive dependency does not modulate its susceptibility to interference effects in comprehension. We propose that attraction is better captured as part of routine retrieval processes and that the (in)sensitivity of reflexives to structurally irrelevant distractors should be explained through other mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":32558,"journal":{"name":"Open Mind","volume":"9 ","pages":"2031-2065"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12768552/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145913156","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-18eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1162/OPMI.a.277
Peng Qian, Tomer D Ullman
People often imagine everyday objects are something else. A turned over bottle becomes a car, a teapot becomes a swan. Such pretense is common in play, pedagogy, and narratives. The relationship between a real and pretend object is flexible, but not arbitrary. In this work, we used a behavioral and computational approach that compares people and performant multi-modal vision models to study the features that guide the construction of visual pretense. In four studies (N = 716 in total), we show that people have systematic preferences in visual pretense, and that these preferences are better accounted for by spatial and physical alignment (specifically shape similarity), over surface feature similarity (such as color). We also found that people systematically align the subpart structure of real and pretend objects. We further show that people's visual pretense preferences are not accounted for by current common approaches to multi-modal vision models, likely due to their reliance on surface features rather than spatial and physical ones.
{"title":"Shape Guides Visual Pretense.","authors":"Peng Qian, Tomer D Ullman","doi":"10.1162/OPMI.a.277","DOIUrl":"10.1162/OPMI.a.277","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People often imagine everyday objects are something else. A turned over bottle becomes a car, a teapot becomes a swan. Such pretense is common in play, pedagogy, and narratives. The relationship between a real and pretend object is flexible, but not arbitrary. In this work, we used a behavioral and computational approach that compares people and performant multi-modal vision models to study the features that guide the construction of visual pretense. In four studies (<i>N</i> = 716 in total), we show that people have systematic preferences in visual pretense, and that these preferences are better accounted for by spatial and physical alignment (specifically shape similarity), over surface feature similarity (such as color). We also found that people systematically align the subpart structure of real and pretend objects. We further show that people's visual pretense preferences are not accounted for by current common approaches to multi-modal vision models, likely due to their reliance on surface features rather than spatial and physical ones.</p>","PeriodicalId":32558,"journal":{"name":"Open Mind","volume":"9 ","pages":"2092-2113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12768553/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145913100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-18eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1162/OPMI.a.315
Ellis Cain, Rachel Ryskin
Humans learn the meanings of words from the contexts in which they are used. Patterns of language use change over time, suggesting that the contexts in which some words are experienced change across an individual's lifespan. Here, we investigated whether language users' semantic space changes in lockstep with changes in the language or whether it retains traces of historical language use/meanings. In two studies, we used distributional semantic word embeddings trained on corpora from different decades (HistWords) to capture meaning change at the level of the (English) language. We first compared these diachronic semantic spaces to the semantic spaces of individuals in different age cohorts (ranging from people in their 20s to people over 70) using an open dataset of associations norms (Small World of Words). Then, using HistWords, we sampled English words that have changed in meaning and words that have maintained the same meaning/usage patterns between the 1950s and the 1990s and collected relatedness judgments for those words with their nearest neighbors from each decade (1950s and 1990s) from both younger (18-33 years) and older (63-92 years) adults. Across the two studies, the semantic spaces of both older and younger adults were most strongly correlated with the semantic spaces derived from more recent corpora. We found little evidence of historical semantic spaces being differentially predictive of the semantic spaces of older adults relative to those of young adults. Our findings suggest that individuals continuously and rapidly update their lexico-semantic representations regardless of age, such that word meanings learned earlier in life are largely replaced with new meanings derived from later language experience.
人类从使用单词的语境中学习单词的意思。语言的使用模式会随着时间的推移而变化,这表明在一个人的一生中,一些词汇所处的语境会发生变化。在这里,我们考察了语言使用者的语义空间是否随着语言的变化而同步变化,或者它是否保留了历史语言使用/意义的痕迹。在两项研究中,我们使用在不同年代的语料库(HistWords)上训练的分布式语义词嵌入来捕捉(英语)语言水平上的意义变化。我们首先使用一个开放的关联规范数据集(Small World of Words),将这些历时语义空间与不同年龄段(从20多岁到70多岁)个体的语义空间进行了比较。然后,使用HistWords,我们抽取了在20世纪50年代到90年代之间意义发生变化的英语单词和保持相同意义/用法模式的单词,并收集了这些单词与每十年(20世纪50年代和90年代)中最接近的单词的相关性判断,这些单词来自年轻(18-33岁)和年长(63-92岁)的成年人。在两项研究中,老年人和年轻人的语义空间与来自较新语料库的语义空间的相关性最强。我们发现很少有证据表明历史语义空间对老年人和年轻人的语义空间有不同的预测。我们的研究结果表明,无论年龄大小,个体都能持续快速地更新他们的词汇语义表征,因此,在生命早期学到的词义在很大程度上被后来的语言经验中获得的新意义所取代。
{"title":"Semantic Representations Are Updated Across the Lifespan Reflecting Diachronic Language Change.","authors":"Ellis Cain, Rachel Ryskin","doi":"10.1162/OPMI.a.315","DOIUrl":"10.1162/OPMI.a.315","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Humans learn the meanings of words from the contexts in which they are used. Patterns of language use change over time, suggesting that the contexts in which some words are experienced change across an individual's lifespan. Here, we investigated whether language users' semantic space changes in lockstep with changes in the language or whether it retains traces of historical language use/meanings. In two studies, we used distributional semantic word embeddings trained on corpora from different decades (HistWords) to capture meaning change at the level of the (English) language. We first compared these diachronic semantic spaces to the semantic spaces of individuals in different age cohorts (ranging from people in their 20s to people over 70) using an open dataset of associations norms (Small World of Words). Then, using HistWords, we sampled English words that have changed in meaning and words that have maintained the same meaning/usage patterns between the 1950s and the 1990s and collected relatedness judgments for those words with their nearest neighbors from each decade (1950s and 1990s) from both younger (18-33 years) and older (63-92 years) adults. Across the two studies, the semantic spaces of both older and younger adults were most strongly correlated with the semantic spaces derived from more recent corpora. We found little evidence of historical semantic spaces being differentially predictive of the semantic spaces of older adults relative to those of young adults. Our findings suggest that individuals continuously and rapidly update their lexico-semantic representations regardless of age, such that word meanings learned earlier in life are largely replaced with new meanings derived from later language experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":32558,"journal":{"name":"Open Mind","volume":"9 ","pages":"2114-2148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12768554/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145913138","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-18eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1162/OPMI.a.276
Nathan Leroy, Arnaud D'Argembeau
Remembering the unfolding of past experiences usually takes less time than their actual duration. In this study, we examined the extent to which this temporal compression in memory depends on the number and duration of events that need to be maintained in a sequence. Participants were asked to watch and then mentally replay short videos depicting one, two, or three continuous events (i.e., people performing continuous actions in an uninterrupted way), each lasting 3, 6, 9, or 12 s. Across two experiments, we computed indices of remembering duration and temporal compression for each event. Results showed that event remembering duration was close to the actual event duration for short events, but smaller for longer ones (i.e., temporal compression was not systematic but occurred selectively depending on event duration). Furthermore, events were mentally replayed more quickly when they were part of a sequence of several events than when they were presented alone, and this decrease in the duration of event recall with the number of events was more pronounced for longer events. Exploratory analyses revealed that individual differences in memory compression were predicted by visual imagery capacity. These results suggest that working memory capacity in representing naturalistic events is limited by both the number and duration of events to be retained, which may in part explain why the unfolding of events is temporally compressed in episodic memory.
{"title":"The Role of Event Number and Duration in Time-Compressed Memory Replay.","authors":"Nathan Leroy, Arnaud D'Argembeau","doi":"10.1162/OPMI.a.276","DOIUrl":"10.1162/OPMI.a.276","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Remembering the unfolding of past experiences usually takes less time than their actual duration. In this study, we examined the extent to which this temporal compression in memory depends on the number and duration of events that need to be maintained in a sequence. Participants were asked to watch and then mentally replay short videos depicting one, two, or three continuous events (i.e., people performing continuous actions in an uninterrupted way), each lasting 3, 6, 9, or 12 s. Across two experiments, we computed indices of remembering duration and temporal compression for each event. Results showed that event remembering duration was close to the actual event duration for short events, but smaller for longer ones (i.e., temporal compression was not systematic but occurred selectively depending on event duration). Furthermore, events were mentally replayed more quickly when they were part of a sequence of several events than when they were presented alone, and this decrease in the duration of event recall with the number of events was more pronounced for longer events. Exploratory analyses revealed that individual differences in memory compression were predicted by visual imagery capacity. These results suggest that working memory capacity in representing naturalistic events is limited by both the number and duration of events to be retained, which may in part explain why the unfolding of events is temporally compressed in episodic memory.</p>","PeriodicalId":32558,"journal":{"name":"Open Mind","volume":"9 ","pages":"2066-2091"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12768557/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145913235","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-18eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1162/OPMI.a.316
Harshada Vinaya, Sean Trott, Diane Pecher, René Zeelenberg, Seana Coulson
An important issue in the semantic memory literature concerns the relative importance of experience-based sensorimotor versus language corpus-based distributional information in conceptual representations. To explore how each contributes to behavioral and neural responses on a conceptual task, EEG and RTs were recorded as healthy young adults viewed terms for concepts (e.g., "APPLE") followed by properties (e.g., "red") and pressed a button to indicate whether the property is true or false for the concept. Next, we constructed a series of mixed effects models of response times (RTs) and single-trial electroencephalogram (EEG) responses to the property words. Distributional models predicted data using semantic distance measures (e.g., between "APPLE" and "red") derived from language corpus-based measures developed by computational linguists. Sensorimotor models predicted data using sensorimotor distance, a measure based on comparisons of each word's experiential strength on the perceptual and action-effector dimensions from the crowd-sourced Lancaster Sensorimotor Norms. Statistical model comparison was used to determine whether the data was best fit by Distributional, Sensorimotor, or both sorts of information. In keeping with hybrid accounts of semantic memory, we find that both measures of semantic distance explained unique variance for behavioral and neural measures. Modelling EEG across seven successive 100-ms intervals revealed that the predictors' temporal dynamics varies between true (APPLE - red) and false (APPLE - black) trials, but showed early sensorimotor activation for both. Results show how linguistic context and task demands modulate the recruitment of different information sources, supporting dynamic hybrid accounts of semantic memory.
{"title":"Words and Worlds Both: Dynamic Effects of Distributional and Sensorimotor Information in Semantic Processing.","authors":"Harshada Vinaya, Sean Trott, Diane Pecher, René Zeelenberg, Seana Coulson","doi":"10.1162/OPMI.a.316","DOIUrl":"10.1162/OPMI.a.316","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An important issue in the semantic memory literature concerns the relative importance of experience-based sensorimotor versus language corpus-based distributional information in conceptual representations. To explore how each contributes to behavioral and neural responses on a conceptual task, EEG and RTs were recorded as healthy young adults viewed terms for concepts (e.g., \"APPLE\") followed by properties (e.g., \"red\") and pressed a button to indicate whether the property is true or false for the concept. Next, we constructed a series of mixed effects models of response times (RTs) and single-trial electroencephalogram (EEG) responses to the property words. Distributional models predicted data using semantic distance measures (e.g., between \"APPLE\" and \"red\") derived from language corpus-based measures developed by computational linguists. Sensorimotor models predicted data using sensorimotor distance, a measure based on comparisons of each word's experiential strength on the perceptual and action-effector dimensions from the crowd-sourced Lancaster Sensorimotor Norms. Statistical model comparison was used to determine whether the data was best fit by Distributional, Sensorimotor, or both sorts of information. In keeping with hybrid accounts of semantic memory, we find that both measures of semantic distance explained unique variance for behavioral and neural measures. Modelling EEG across seven successive 100-ms intervals revealed that the predictors' temporal dynamics varies between true (APPLE - red) and false (APPLE - black) trials, but showed early sensorimotor activation for both. Results show how linguistic context and task demands modulate the recruitment of different information sources, supporting dynamic hybrid accounts of semantic memory.</p>","PeriodicalId":32558,"journal":{"name":"Open Mind","volume":"9 ","pages":"2149-2174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12768550/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145913275","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-15eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1162/OPMI.a.251
Aleksandra Ćwiek, Susanne Fuchs
The relation between the fundamental frequency of the voice (f0) and vertical space has been shown in previous studies; however, the underlying mechanisms are less clear. This study investigates the relationship between head angle and f0 in iconic prosody, along with the influence of object size on lip opening and formant frequencies. In the experiment, participants pointed to objects of two different sizes and in various vertical positions while saying the words "piff" or "paff," which induced vertical head position change. Head angle emerged as a reliable predictor of f0, with a larger angle increasing the f0. This effect was consistent despite individual variations in head movement. While the vertical position of the object also showed a reliable effect on f0, head angle substantially outperformed it as a predictor, suggesting that head angle represents the primary physiological mechanism predicting f0 changes. Conversely, object size did not predict either lip opening or formant dispersion. Lip opening and formant dispersion were purely indexical, tracking vowel-specific articulatory configurations rather than external object properties. These findings underscore the role of head position in modulating f0 through direct physiological coupling, potentially underpinning iconic prosody, while revealing the limits of size-related iconicity in parameters constrained by phonemic requirements.
{"title":"The Scope and Limits of Iconic Prosody: Head Angle Predicts <i>f</i>0 Changes While Object Size Effects Are Absent.","authors":"Aleksandra Ćwiek, Susanne Fuchs","doi":"10.1162/OPMI.a.251","DOIUrl":"10.1162/OPMI.a.251","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The relation between the fundamental frequency of the voice (<i>f</i>0) and vertical space has been shown in previous studies; however, the underlying mechanisms are less clear. This study investigates the relationship between head angle and <i>f</i>0 in iconic prosody, along with the influence of object size on lip opening and formant frequencies. In the experiment, participants pointed to objects of two different sizes and in various vertical positions while saying the words \"piff\" or \"paff,\" which induced vertical head position change. Head angle emerged as a reliable predictor of <i>f</i>0, with a larger angle increasing the <i>f</i>0. This effect was consistent despite individual variations in head movement. While the vertical position of the object also showed a reliable effect on <i>f</i>0, head angle substantially outperformed it as a predictor, suggesting that head angle represents the primary physiological mechanism predicting <i>f</i>0 changes. Conversely, object size did not predict either lip opening or formant dispersion. Lip opening and formant dispersion were purely indexical, tracking vowel-specific articulatory configurations rather than external object properties. These findings underscore the role of head position in modulating <i>f</i>0 through direct physiological coupling, potentially underpinning iconic prosody, while revealing the limits of size-related iconicity in parameters constrained by phonemic requirements.</p>","PeriodicalId":32558,"journal":{"name":"Open Mind","volume":"9 ","pages":"1959-1981"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12746761/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145865958","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-22eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1162/OPMI.a.257
Nicholas M Wilkinson
Within minutes of birth a newborn gnu or giraffe works to stand and walk, asserting postural balance and organised animate behaviour in an apparently goal-directed manner. In contrast, robots learning to stand and walk from scratch begin with random flailing, the behaviour cohering over time as the robot internalises some reward/value signal. How does the newborn gnu 'innately know' what goal to aim for, and decide to work towards it? How could similar goal-directed balance learning be implemented in robots? Currently, animate balance inherits its axiomatic definition from the Newtonian formulation for inanimate balance; static mechanical equilibrium. This is arguably inappropriate for animate balance, because animals need to move and are never in static mechanical equilibrium, giving rise to the 'posture-movement paradox'. The present Perspective proposes a more fluid, dynamical axiomatic task definition and goal which (a) isolates resisting gravity, (b) admits and enables movement, and (c) subsumes static mechanical equilibrium as a special case. This novel definition is founded upon inevitable biophysical requirements and observable developmental process. The article explains how animals apprehend and embed this goal through prenatal development suspended in equidense amniotic fluid, and then are challenged to self-maintain it by the perinatal transition. The account entails a paradigmatic shift in putative physiological organisation and associated conceptual framework for balance; from a subsidiary sensorimotor control task to a vital mechano-regulation task, organisationally akin to thermo-regulation. This vital mechano-regulation model of balance has practical implications and implies a range of predictions.
{"title":"What is Balance? A Vital Mechano-Regulation Paradigm.","authors":"Nicholas M Wilkinson","doi":"10.1162/OPMI.a.257","DOIUrl":"10.1162/OPMI.a.257","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Within minutes of birth a newborn gnu or giraffe works to stand and walk, asserting postural balance and organised animate behaviour in an apparently goal-directed manner. In contrast, robots learning to stand and walk from scratch begin with random flailing, the behaviour cohering over time as the robot internalises some reward/value signal. How does the newborn gnu 'innately know' what goal to aim for, and decide to work towards it? How could similar goal-directed balance learning be implemented in robots? Currently, animate balance inherits its axiomatic definition from the Newtonian formulation for inanimate balance; static mechanical equilibrium. This is arguably inappropriate for animate balance, because animals need to move and are never in static mechanical equilibrium, giving rise to the 'posture-movement paradox'. The present Perspective proposes a more fluid, dynamical axiomatic task definition and goal which (a) isolates resisting gravity, (b) admits and enables movement, and (c) subsumes static mechanical equilibrium as a special case. This novel definition is founded upon inevitable biophysical requirements and observable developmental process. The article explains how animals apprehend and embed this goal through prenatal development suspended in equidense amniotic fluid, and then are challenged to self-maintain it by the perinatal transition. The account entails a paradigmatic shift in putative physiological organisation and associated conceptual framework for balance; from a subsidiary sensorimotor control task to a vital mechano-regulation task, organisationally akin to thermo-regulation. This vital mechano-regulation model of balance has practical implications and implies a range of predictions.</p>","PeriodicalId":32558,"journal":{"name":"Open Mind","volume":"9 ","pages":"1982-2004"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12768556/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145913269","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-22eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1162/OPMI.a.258
Emory Richardson, Isaac Davis, Frank Keil
Consensus-based social learning strategies often outcompete other strategies in evolutionary models. But while formal proofs suggest that consensus' reliability is compromised when individual judgments are not independent, this makes for a notoriously implausible assumption in the biological world: the people we learn from are constantly learning from each other as well. How do we avoid being misled by consensus? We present three experiments and a computational model examining commonsense reasoning about how people's public and private judgments are influenced by the consensus and social status of those around them. Results suggest that while people realize that these two factors can cause others' public and private judgments to diverge, their own trust in public consensus depends on how accurately they believe it reflects their informants' true beliefs.
{"title":"Agenda Setting and <i>The Emperor's New Clothes</i>: People Diagnose Information Cascades During Sequential Testimony by Reasoning About Informants' Speaking Order and Social Status.","authors":"Emory Richardson, Isaac Davis, Frank Keil","doi":"10.1162/OPMI.a.258","DOIUrl":"10.1162/OPMI.a.258","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Consensus-based social learning strategies often outcompete other strategies in evolutionary models. But while formal proofs suggest that consensus' reliability is compromised when individual judgments are not independent, this makes for a notoriously implausible assumption in the biological world: the people we learn from are constantly learning from each other as well. How do we avoid being misled by consensus? We present three experiments and a computational model examining commonsense reasoning about how people's public and private judgments are influenced by the consensus and social status of those around them. Results suggest that while people realize that these two factors can cause others' public and private judgments to diverge, their own trust in public consensus depends on how accurately they believe it reflects their informants' true beliefs.</p>","PeriodicalId":32558,"journal":{"name":"Open Mind","volume":"9 ","pages":"2005-2030"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12768551/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145912742","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-10eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1162/OPMI.a.255
Eleftheria Pistolas, Boris Quétard, Sucharit Katyal, Johan Wagemans
A Ganzfeld is a homogeneous visual field, devoid of any focal points. Such a stimulus has been used by researchers to study perceptual phenomena in the absence of changes in sensory structure. Others have used it to study altered states of consciousness (ASCs). Until now, these different facets have been studied separately with little attention for the emotional subjective experience. This study aimed to elucidate the perceptual, phenomenal, and emotional experience of the multifaceted Ganzfeld using a multi-method approach combining behavioral (eye-tracking) and neural (electroencephalography; EEG) measures, with qualitative (interviews) and quantitative (questionnaires) assessments. We show that Ganzfeld spaces induce ASCs and offer immersive, full-body experiences, including bodily effects. Our results pertaining to bodily sensations further prompted us to identify a perceptually grounded cognitive processing type with either an inward-directed or externally-directed focus. We also identified the presence of an abstract cognitive processing type characterized by an introspective focus and meditative experiences. At the behavioral level, decays were characterized by decreased eye movements. The lag in reporting decays and the subjective experience of decays point to the notion of mind blanking. At the neural level, we found increased theta activity preceding decays, further hinting at a potential interrelation between perceptual decays and mind blanking. Finally, decays were characterized by more alpha activity, a pattern often associated with attenuated sensory processing and states of reduced external engagement (Jensen & Mazaheri, 2010), such as relaxation. Our findings contribute to a more in-depth understanding of all the components contributing to the rich Ganzfeld experiences.
{"title":"The Multifaceted Ganzfeld at the Crossroad Between Visual Perception and Consciousness: Behavioral, Neural and Qualitative Aspects.","authors":"Eleftheria Pistolas, Boris Quétard, Sucharit Katyal, Johan Wagemans","doi":"10.1162/OPMI.a.255","DOIUrl":"10.1162/OPMI.a.255","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A Ganzfeld is a homogeneous visual field, devoid of any focal points. Such a stimulus has been used by researchers to study perceptual phenomena in the absence of changes in sensory structure. Others have used it to study altered states of consciousness (ASCs). Until now, these different facets have been studied separately with little attention for the emotional subjective experience. This study aimed to elucidate the perceptual, phenomenal, and emotional experience of the multifaceted Ganzfeld using a multi-method approach combining behavioral (eye-tracking) and neural (electroencephalography; EEG) measures, with qualitative (interviews) and quantitative (questionnaires) assessments. We show that Ganzfeld spaces induce ASCs and offer immersive, full-body experiences, including bodily effects. Our results pertaining to bodily sensations further prompted us to identify a perceptually grounded cognitive processing type with either an inward-directed or externally-directed focus. We also identified the presence of an abstract cognitive processing type characterized by an introspective focus and meditative experiences. At the behavioral level, decays were characterized by decreased eye movements. The lag in reporting decays and the subjective experience of decays point to the notion of mind blanking. At the neural level, we found increased theta activity preceding decays, further hinting at a potential interrelation between perceptual decays and mind blanking. Finally, decays were characterized by more alpha activity, a pattern often associated with attenuated sensory processing and states of reduced external engagement (Jensen & Mazaheri, 2010), such as relaxation. Our findings contribute to a more in-depth understanding of all the components contributing to the rich Ganzfeld experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":32558,"journal":{"name":"Open Mind","volume":"9 ","pages":"1906-1938"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12622472/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145551238","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}