The effects of feeding frequency on jaw loading in two lemur species

IF 1.7 2区 生物学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY American Journal of Biological Anthropology Pub Date : 2024-03-05 DOI:10.1002/ajpa.24916
Nayuta Yamashita, Nina Flowers, Mariana Dutra Fogaça
{"title":"The effects of feeding frequency on jaw loading in two lemur species","authors":"Nayuta Yamashita,&nbsp;Nina Flowers,&nbsp;Mariana Dutra Fogaça","doi":"10.1002/ajpa.24916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Studies on oral processing are often snapshots of behaviors that examine feeding through individual bouts. In this study, we expand on our previous work comparing bite/chew variables per feeding bout to summed daily biting, chewing, and food intake to interpret loading that could have potential morphological effects.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We observed sympatric <i>Lemur catta</i> and <i>Propithecus verreauxi</i> over two field seasons in the dry forest of Bezà Mahafaly Special Reserve in southwestern Madagascar. Bite and chew rates determined from videos filmed during observations were multiplied with time spent feeding on specific foods during focal follows to calculate daily values for each feeding bout. Food mechanical properties (FMPs) were tested on dietary items with a portable tester. We contrasted daily bite/chew numbers and intake with FMPs, species, season, and food shape.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Daily bite and chew numbers increased with maximum, but not average, food toughness. Daily intake decreased with average and maximum toughness. Season had a strong effect on daily bites and chews, but not on intake. Food shape influenced intake and total bite and chew numbers. The lemur species did not differ in our models.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Maximum food toughness impacted feeding behaviors and intake, which is consistent with higher loads having a greater effect on morphology. In contrast to feeding per bout, cumulative biting and chewing did not differ between species; taking feeding frequency into consideration affects interpretation of jaw loading. Finally, biting, as much as chewing, may generate strains that impact morphology.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":29759,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Biological Anthropology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajpa.24916","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Biological Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajpa.24916","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Studies on oral processing are often snapshots of behaviors that examine feeding through individual bouts. In this study, we expand on our previous work comparing bite/chew variables per feeding bout to summed daily biting, chewing, and food intake to interpret loading that could have potential morphological effects.

Materials and Methods

We observed sympatric Lemur catta and Propithecus verreauxi over two field seasons in the dry forest of Bezà Mahafaly Special Reserve in southwestern Madagascar. Bite and chew rates determined from videos filmed during observations were multiplied with time spent feeding on specific foods during focal follows to calculate daily values for each feeding bout. Food mechanical properties (FMPs) were tested on dietary items with a portable tester. We contrasted daily bite/chew numbers and intake with FMPs, species, season, and food shape.

Results

Daily bite and chew numbers increased with maximum, but not average, food toughness. Daily intake decreased with average and maximum toughness. Season had a strong effect on daily bites and chews, but not on intake. Food shape influenced intake and total bite and chew numbers. The lemur species did not differ in our models.

Discussion

Maximum food toughness impacted feeding behaviors and intake, which is consistent with higher loads having a greater effect on morphology. In contrast to feeding per bout, cumulative biting and chewing did not differ between species; taking feeding frequency into consideration affects interpretation of jaw loading. Finally, biting, as much as chewing, may generate strains that impact morphology.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种狐猴的进食频率对颌骨负荷的影响。
研究目的有关口腔加工的研究通常是通过单次进食来研究进食行为的快照。在本研究中,我们在先前工作的基础上,将每次进食的咬/嚼变量与每日咬、嚼和食物摄入量的总和进行比较,以解释可能具有潜在形态学影响的负荷:我们在马达加斯加西南部Bezà Mahafaly特别保护区的干燥森林中观察了两季同栖狐猴catta和Propithecus verreauxi。通过观察期间拍摄的视频确定的咬嚼率乘以重点跟踪期间摄食特定食物的时间,计算出每次摄食的日值。用便携式测试仪测试了食物的机械性能(FMP)。我们将每日咬嚼次数和摄入量与食物机械性能、物种、季节和食物形状进行了对比:结果:每日咬嚼次数随食物最大韧性(而非平均韧性)的增加而增加。日摄入量随着平均和最大韧性的增加而减少。季节对每日咬嚼次数有很大影响,但对摄入量没有影响。食物形状会影响摄入量以及咬嚼总量。狐猴的种类在我们的模型中没有差异:讨论:食物的最大韧性影响摄食行为和摄入量,这与较高的负荷对形态的影响更大是一致的。与每次进食不同的是,不同物种之间的累积咬合和咀嚼没有差异;考虑进食频率会影响对颌骨负荷的解释。最后,与咀嚼一样,咬合也可能产生影响形态的应变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The intersectional effects of sex and socioeconomic status on risk of mortality in industrializing England. Dying of pestilence: Stature and mortality from the Black Death in 14th-century Kyrgyzstan. Technical note: Does scan resolution or downsampling impact the analysis of trabecular bone architecture? Evolutionary selection and morphological integration in the hand of modern humans. "How Handy was early hominin 'know-how'?" An experimental approach exploring efficient early stone tool use.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1