Consent as a compositional act - a framework that provides clarity for the retention and use of data.

IF 1.7 4区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine Pub Date : 2024-03-06 DOI:10.1186/s13010-024-00152-0
Minerva C Rivas Velarde, Christian Lovis, Marcello Ienca, Caroline Samer, Samia Hurst
{"title":"Consent as a compositional act - a framework that provides clarity for the retention and use of data.","authors":"Minerva C Rivas Velarde, Christian Lovis, Marcello Ienca, Caroline Samer, Samia Hurst","doi":"10.1186/s13010-024-00152-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Informed consent is one of the key principles of conducting research involving humans. When research participants give consent, they perform an act in which they utter, write or otherwise provide an authorisation to somebody to do something. This paper proposes a new understanding of the informed consent as a compositional act. This conceptualisation departs from a modular conceptualisation of informed consent procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This paper is a conceptual analysis that explores what consent is and what it does or does not do. It presents a framework that explores the basic elements of consent and breaks it down into its component parts. It analyses the consent act by first identifying its basic elements, namely: a) data subjects or legal representative that provides the authorisation of consent; b) a specific thing that is being consented to; and c) specific agent(s) to whom the consent is given.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This paper presents a framework that explores the basic elements of consent and breaks it down into its component parts. It goes beyond only providing choices to potential research participants; it explains the rationale of those choices or consenting acts that are taking place when speaking or writing an authorisation to do something to somebody.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We argue that by clearly differentiating the goals, the procedures of implementation, and what is being done or undone when one consent, one can better face the challenges of contemporary data-intensive biomedical research, particularly regarding the retention and use of data. Conceptualising consent as a compositional act enhances more efficient communication and accountability and, therefore, could enable more trustworthy acts of consent in biomedical science.</p>","PeriodicalId":56062,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine","volume":"19 1","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10916011/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13010-024-00152-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Informed consent is one of the key principles of conducting research involving humans. When research participants give consent, they perform an act in which they utter, write or otherwise provide an authorisation to somebody to do something. This paper proposes a new understanding of the informed consent as a compositional act. This conceptualisation departs from a modular conceptualisation of informed consent procedures.

Methods: This paper is a conceptual analysis that explores what consent is and what it does or does not do. It presents a framework that explores the basic elements of consent and breaks it down into its component parts. It analyses the consent act by first identifying its basic elements, namely: a) data subjects or legal representative that provides the authorisation of consent; b) a specific thing that is being consented to; and c) specific agent(s) to whom the consent is given.

Results: This paper presents a framework that explores the basic elements of consent and breaks it down into its component parts. It goes beyond only providing choices to potential research participants; it explains the rationale of those choices or consenting acts that are taking place when speaking or writing an authorisation to do something to somebody.

Conclusions: We argue that by clearly differentiating the goals, the procedures of implementation, and what is being done or undone when one consent, one can better face the challenges of contemporary data-intensive biomedical research, particularly regarding the retention and use of data. Conceptualising consent as a compositional act enhances more efficient communication and accountability and, therefore, could enable more trustworthy acts of consent in biomedical science.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为构成行为的同意--为保留和使用数据提供清晰框架。
背景:知情同意是开展人类研究的重要原则之一。当研究参与者表示同意时,他们的行为是说出、写下或以其他方式授权某人做某事。本文提出了一种新的理解,即知情同意是一种组合行为。这种概念化脱离了知情同意程序的模块化概念:本文从概念上分析了什么是同意,同意做什么或不做什么。本文提出了一个探讨同意的基本要素并将其分解为各个组成部分的框架。本文分析了同意行为,首先确定了其基本要素,即:a) 提供同意授权的数据主体或法定代表人;b) 被同意的具体事物;c) 获得同意的具体代理人:本文提出的框架探讨了同意的基本要素,并将其分解为各个组成部分。它不仅为潜在的研究参与者提供了选择,还解释了在口头或书面授权对某人进行某种行为时,这些选择或同意行为的基本原理:我们认为,通过明确区分目标、实施程序以及同意时的作为或不作为,可以更好地面对当代数据密集型生物医学研究的挑战,尤其是在数据的保留和使用方面。将 "同意 "概念化为一种组合行为,可以提高沟通效率和责任感,从而使生物医学科学中的 "同意 "行为更值得信赖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine
Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine Arts and Humanities-History and Philosophy of Science
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine considers articles on the philosophy of medicine and biology, and on ethical aspects of clinical practice and research. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that encompasses all aspects of the philosophy of medicine and biology, and the ethical aspects of clinical practice and research. It also considers papers at the intersection of medicine and humanities, including the history of medicine, that are relevant to contemporary philosophy of medicine and bioethics. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine is the official publication of the Pellegrino Center for Clinical Bioethics at Georgetown University Medical Center.
期刊最新文献
Assessing attitudes toward research and plagiarism among medical students: a multi-site study. Ordinary defensive medicine: in the shadows of general practitioners' postures toward (over-)medicalisation. Intersectionality and discriminatory practices within mentalhealth care. The modern-day "Rest Cure": "The yellow Wallpaper" and underrepresentation in clinical research. Epistemic appropriation and the ethics of engaging with trans community knowledge in the context of mental healthcare research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1