{"title":"The Gutnish si-passive","authors":"Erik M. Petzell","doi":"10.1017/s0332586524000027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Gutnish-specific <jats:italic>si</jats:italic>-passive combines <jats:sc>be</jats:sc> or <jats:sc>become</jats:sc> with a participle, directly followed by the element <jats:italic>si</jats:italic>. Unlike regular periphrastic passives, <jats:italic>si</jats:italic>-passives focus on the process rather than the result, opening up the construction for unergatives, which are unattested in the regular type. However, <jats:italic>si</jats:italic>-passives are quite limited when it comes to the subject. Internal arguments can only become subjects if they strand a preposition or a particle. Otherwise, the subject is expletive. I argue that <jats:italic>si</jats:italic> is part of the participle ending in Asp<jats:sup>o</jats:sup>, where its phi-features block agreement with the internal argument, trapping it <jats:italic>in situ</jats:italic> and depriving Asp<jats:sup>o</jats:sup> of a link to the result of the event. Originally a reflexive, <jats:italic>si</jats:italic> was reanalysed as a marker of the participle rather than the infinitive in contexts where conjugational changes had made them ambiguous. These changes never affected Fårö, where the <jats:italic>si</jats:italic>-passive is thus correctly predicted to be absent.","PeriodicalId":43203,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Linguistics","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0332586524000027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Gutnish-specific si-passive combines be or become with a participle, directly followed by the element si. Unlike regular periphrastic passives, si-passives focus on the process rather than the result, opening up the construction for unergatives, which are unattested in the regular type. However, si-passives are quite limited when it comes to the subject. Internal arguments can only become subjects if they strand a preposition or a particle. Otherwise, the subject is expletive. I argue that si is part of the participle ending in Aspo, where its phi-features block agreement with the internal argument, trapping it in situ and depriving Aspo of a link to the result of the event. Originally a reflexive, si was reanalysed as a marker of the participle rather than the infinitive in contexts where conjugational changes had made them ambiguous. These changes never affected Fårö, where the si-passive is thus correctly predicted to be absent.