Comparative Analysis of Shear Strength Prediction Models for Reinforced Concrete Slab–Column Connections

IF 1.5 4区 工程技术 Q3 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Advances in Civil Engineering Pub Date : 2024-03-06 DOI:10.1155/2024/1784088
Sarmed Wahab, Nasim Shakouri Mahmoudabadi, Sarmad Waqas, Nouman Herl, Muhammad Iqbal, Khurshid Alam, Afaq Ahmad
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Shear Strength Prediction Models for Reinforced Concrete Slab–Column Connections","authors":"Sarmed Wahab, Nasim Shakouri Mahmoudabadi, Sarmad Waqas, Nouman Herl, Muhammad Iqbal, Khurshid Alam, Afaq Ahmad","doi":"10.1155/2024/1784088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research focuses on a comprehensive comparative analysis of shear strength prediction in slab–column connections, integrating machine learning, design codes, and finite element analysis (FEA). The existing empirical models lack the influencing parameters that decrease their prediction accuracy. In this paper, current design codes of American Concrete Institute 318-19 (ACI 318-19) and Eurocode 2 (EC2), as well as innovative approaches like the compressive force path method and machine learning models are employed to predict the punching shear strength using a comprehensive database of 610 samples. The database consists of seven key parameters including slab depth (<i>d</i><sub><i>s</i></sub>), column dimension (<i>c</i><sub><i>s</i></sub>), shear span ratio (<i>a</i><sub><i>v</i></sub>/<i>d</i>), yield strength of longitudinal steel (<i>f</i><sub><i>y</i></sub>), longitudinal reinforcement ratio (<i>ρ</i><sub><i>l</i></sub>), ultimate load-carrying capacity (<i>V</i><sub><i>u</i></sub>), and concrete compressive strength (<i>f</i><sub><i>c</i></sub>). Compared with the design codes and other machine learning models, the particle swarm optimization-based feedforward neural network (PSOFNN) performed the best predictions. PSOFNN predicted the punching shear of flat slab with maximum accuracy with <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> value of 99.37% and least MSE and MAE values of 0.0275% and 1.214%, respectively. The findings of the study are validated through FEA of slabs to confirm experimental results and machine learning predictions that showed excellent agreement with PSOFNN predictions. The research also provides insight into the application of metaheuristic models along with ANN, revealing that not all metaheuristic models can outperform ANN as usually perceived. The study also highlights superior predictive capabilities of EC2 over ACI 318-19 for punching shear values.","PeriodicalId":7242,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Civil Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/1784088","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research focuses on a comprehensive comparative analysis of shear strength prediction in slab–column connections, integrating machine learning, design codes, and finite element analysis (FEA). The existing empirical models lack the influencing parameters that decrease their prediction accuracy. In this paper, current design codes of American Concrete Institute 318-19 (ACI 318-19) and Eurocode 2 (EC2), as well as innovative approaches like the compressive force path method and machine learning models are employed to predict the punching shear strength using a comprehensive database of 610 samples. The database consists of seven key parameters including slab depth (ds), column dimension (cs), shear span ratio (av/d), yield strength of longitudinal steel (fy), longitudinal reinforcement ratio (ρl), ultimate load-carrying capacity (Vu), and concrete compressive strength (fc). Compared with the design codes and other machine learning models, the particle swarm optimization-based feedforward neural network (PSOFNN) performed the best predictions. PSOFNN predicted the punching shear of flat slab with maximum accuracy with R2 value of 99.37% and least MSE and MAE values of 0.0275% and 1.214%, respectively. The findings of the study are validated through FEA of slabs to confirm experimental results and machine learning predictions that showed excellent agreement with PSOFNN predictions. The research also provides insight into the application of metaheuristic models along with ANN, revealing that not all metaheuristic models can outperform ANN as usually perceived. The study also highlights superior predictive capabilities of EC2 over ACI 318-19 for punching shear values.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
钢筋混凝土板柱连接剪切强度预测模型的比较分析
本研究的重点是结合机器学习、设计规范和有限元分析(FEA),对板柱连接中的抗剪强度预测进行综合比较分析。现有的经验模型缺乏影响参数,从而降低了预测精度。本文采用美国混凝土协会 318-19 (ACI 318-19) 和欧洲规范 2 (EC2) 等现行设计规范,以及压缩力路径法和机器学习模型等创新方法,利用包含 610 个样本的综合数据库预测冲切强度。该数据库包含七个关键参数,包括板深度 (ds)、柱尺寸 (cs)、剪跨比 (av/d)、纵向钢筋屈服强度 (fy)、纵向配筋率 (ρl)、极限承载力 (Vu) 和混凝土抗压强度 (fc)。与设计规范和其他机器学习模型相比,基于粒子群优化的前馈神经网络(PSOFNN)的预测效果最好。PSOFNN 预测平板冲切剪力的准确度最高,R2 值为 99.37%,最小 MSE 值和 MAE 值分别为 0.0275% 和 1.214%。研究结果通过板的有限元分析进行了验证,以确认实验结果和机器学习预测与 PSOFNN 预测的极佳一致性。研究还深入探讨了元启发式模型与 ANN 的应用,揭示了并非所有元启发式模型都能像通常认为的那样优于 ANN。该研究还强调了 EC2 对冲剪力值的预测能力优于 ACI 318-19。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Civil Engineering
Advances in Civil Engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
612
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Civil Engineering publishes papers in all areas of civil engineering. The journal welcomes submissions across a range of disciplines, and publishes both theoretical and practical studies. Contributions from academia and from industry are equally encouraged. Subject areas include (but are by no means limited to): -Structural mechanics and engineering- Structural design and construction management- Structural analysis and computational mechanics- Construction technology and implementation- Construction materials design and engineering- Highway and transport engineering- Bridge and tunnel engineering- Municipal and urban engineering- Coastal, harbour and offshore engineering-- Geotechnical and earthquake engineering Engineering for water, waste, energy, and environmental applications- Hydraulic engineering and fluid mechanics- Surveying, monitoring, and control systems in construction- Health and safety in a civil engineering setting. Advances in Civil Engineering also publishes focused review articles that examine the state of the art, identify emerging trends, and suggest future directions for developing fields.
期刊最新文献
Application of Ecofriendly Geopolymer Binder to Enhance the Strength and Swelling Properties of Expansive Soils Application of Fully Connected Neural Network-Based PyTorch in Concrete Compressive Strength Prediction Influence of Mechanical and Microscopic Properties of Red Sandstone Modified by Different Solid Waste Materials A Comparative Study of Subsurface Profile Using Bore Log Data and Geophysical Method at Mandideep Region, India Mapping Longitudinal and Transverse Displacements of a Dam Crest Based on the Synergy of High-Precision Remote Sensing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1