Mapping stakeholders to maximise the impact of research on health inequalities for people with learning disabilities: The development of a framework for the Making Positive Moves study

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL British Journal of Learning Disabilities Pub Date : 2024-03-04 DOI:10.1111/bld.12591
Francesca Beeken, Dafni Katsampa, Moureen Duxbury, Helen-Ellis Caird, Annabel Head, Sam Prowse, David Wellsted, Pashtana Zormati, Silvana E. Mengoni, Louisa Rhodes
{"title":"Mapping stakeholders to maximise the impact of research on health inequalities for people with learning disabilities: The development of a framework for the Making Positive Moves study","authors":"Francesca Beeken,&nbsp;Dafni Katsampa,&nbsp;Moureen Duxbury,&nbsp;Helen-Ellis Caird,&nbsp;Annabel Head,&nbsp;Sam Prowse,&nbsp;David Wellsted,&nbsp;Pashtana Zormati,&nbsp;Silvana E. Mengoni,&nbsp;Louisa Rhodes","doi":"10.1111/bld.12591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>People with learning disabilities experience health and social inequalities, and research that could improve health services may not be implemented in real-life settings. Building stakeholder networks that can share and implement research findings may address this. This paper presents a framework for building a stakeholder network that maximises the likelihood of research recommendations being implemented in practice. This was developed as part of the ‘Making Positive Moves’ (MPM) study, which explores the experiences of people with learning disabilities following discharge from a residential stay within a hospital inpatient setting.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We reviewed the literature on existing theoretical frameworks to support the development of a model for dissemination of the MPM findings. Stakeholder categories were identified through consultation with the MPM researchers, experts by experience and the steering group and a hub and spoke model to represent all stakeholder categories was created. These categories include person moving; family of the person moving; specialist schools; social care; care providers; regulators; third sector organisations; policy organisations; academic community; and NHS professionals. After establishing the categories, we consulted with people with learning disabilities and other stakeholders and conducted online searches to create a stakeholder database. Through information gathering and direct contact with stakeholders, we assessed levels of interest, power and engagement to determine which stakeholders to prioritise in our dissemination activities. The Stakeholder Wheel was created to present the data captured within the database and engagement profiles in an illustrative way.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>We use two stakeholder sub-categories, user-led organisations and care providers, to demonstrate the methodological approach. The examples illustrate how a scoring system helped us to identify high-priority stakeholders who we then contacted to collaborate within developing our dissemination strategy to maximise the impact of the MPM research findings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>We developed a framework to map stakeholders for the MPM study and enable targeted dissemination to increase the impact of the research. This approach has the potential to reduce health inequalities among people with learning disabilities by increasing the awareness of and ability to implement evidence-based recommendations in real-life settings. The stakeholder mapping framework could be applied to research projects associated with learning disabilities to bridge the gap between research and practice and reduce health inequalities.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47232,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":"52 3","pages":"443-455"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bld.12591","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Learning Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bld.12591","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

People with learning disabilities experience health and social inequalities, and research that could improve health services may not be implemented in real-life settings. Building stakeholder networks that can share and implement research findings may address this. This paper presents a framework for building a stakeholder network that maximises the likelihood of research recommendations being implemented in practice. This was developed as part of the ‘Making Positive Moves’ (MPM) study, which explores the experiences of people with learning disabilities following discharge from a residential stay within a hospital inpatient setting.

Methods

We reviewed the literature on existing theoretical frameworks to support the development of a model for dissemination of the MPM findings. Stakeholder categories were identified through consultation with the MPM researchers, experts by experience and the steering group and a hub and spoke model to represent all stakeholder categories was created. These categories include person moving; family of the person moving; specialist schools; social care; care providers; regulators; third sector organisations; policy organisations; academic community; and NHS professionals. After establishing the categories, we consulted with people with learning disabilities and other stakeholders and conducted online searches to create a stakeholder database. Through information gathering and direct contact with stakeholders, we assessed levels of interest, power and engagement to determine which stakeholders to prioritise in our dissemination activities. The Stakeholder Wheel was created to present the data captured within the database and engagement profiles in an illustrative way.

Findings

We use two stakeholder sub-categories, user-led organisations and care providers, to demonstrate the methodological approach. The examples illustrate how a scoring system helped us to identify high-priority stakeholders who we then contacted to collaborate within developing our dissemination strategy to maximise the impact of the MPM research findings.

Conclusions

We developed a framework to map stakeholders for the MPM study and enable targeted dissemination to increase the impact of the research. This approach has the potential to reduce health inequalities among people with learning disabilities by increasing the awareness of and ability to implement evidence-based recommendations in real-life settings. The stakeholder mapping framework could be applied to research projects associated with learning disabilities to bridge the gap between research and practice and reduce health inequalities.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
摸清利益相关者的情况,最大限度地扩大对学习障碍者健康不平等问题研究的影响:制定 "积极行动 "研究框架
背景有学习障碍的人经历着健康和社会不平等,可以改善医疗服务的研究可能无法在现实生活中实施。建立能够分享和实施研究成果的利益相关者网络可以解决这一问题。本文介绍了建立利益相关者网络的框架,以最大限度地提高研究建议在实践中得到实施的可能性。该框架是 "积极行动"(MPM)研究的一部分,该研究探讨了学习障碍人士从医院住院环境中的住宿出院后的经历。通过咨询 MPM 研究人员、经验专家和指导小组,我们确定了利益相关者的类别,并创建了一个中心辐射模型来代表所有利益相关者类别。这些类别包括搬家者、搬家者的家人、专科学校、社会医疗机构、医疗服务提供者、监管机构、第三部门组织、政策组织、学术界以及国家医疗服务体系的专业人员。确定类别后,我们咨询了有学习障碍的人和其他利益相关者,并进行了在线搜索,以创建一个利益相关者数据库。通过收集信息和与利益相关者直接接触,我们评估了利益相关者的兴趣、权力和参与程度,以确定在传播活动中优先考虑哪些利益相关者。我们创建了 "利益相关者轮盘",以说明性的方式展示数据库中的数据和参与情况。研究结果我们使用两个利益相关者子类别(用户主导的组织和护理提供者)来展示方法论。这些例子说明了评分系统如何帮助我们识别出高优先级的利益相关者,然后我们联系这些利益相关者,共同制定传播策略,以最大限度地扩大 MPM 研究成果的影响。这种方法可以提高人们在现实生活中实施循证建议的意识和能力,从而有可能减少学习障碍人群中的健康不平等现象。利益相关者绘图框架可应用于与学习障碍有关的研究项目,以缩小研究与实践之间的差距,减少健康不平等现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Learning Disabilities is an interdisciplinary international peer-reviewed journal which aims to be the leading journal in the learning disability field. It is the official Journal of the British Institute of Learning Disabilities. It encompasses contemporary debate/s and developments in research, policy and practice that are relevant to the field of learning disabilities. It publishes original refereed papers, regular special issues giving comprehensive coverage to specific subject areas, and especially commissioned keynote reviews on major topics. In addition, there are reviews of books and training materials, and a letters section. The focus of the journal is on practical issues, with current debates and research reports. Topics covered could include, but not be limited to: Current trends in residential and day-care service Inclusion, rehabilitation and quality of life Education and training Historical and inclusive pieces [particularly welcomed are those co-written with people with learning disabilities] Therapies Mental health issues Employment and occupation Recreation and leisure; Ethical issues, advocacy and rights Family and carers Health issues Adoption and fostering Causation and management of specific syndromes Staff training New technology Policy critique and impact.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information What Approaches Described in Research Literature Enhance the Engagement of Children and Young People With Severe or Profound and Multiple Learning Disabilities? A Systematic Literature Review Staff Perceptions of Mental Health Relapse Prevention Support in a Specialist Mental Health Service in an Intellectual Disability Setting Item reduction of the “Support Intensity Scale” for people with intellectual disabilities, using machine learning Culturally adaptive healthcare for people with a learning disability from an ethnic minority background: A qualitative synthesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1