Disability Law Reform in Australia: Principles, Pragmatism and Politics.

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW Journal of Law and Medicine Pub Date : 2023-12-01
Ian Freckelton
{"title":"Disability Law Reform in Australia: Principles, Pragmatism and Politics.","authors":"Ian Freckelton","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This editorial reviews two landmark contributions to disability reform in Australia, both published in 2023 - the 12 volume report of the Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation of People with Disability and the important Commonwealth Government of Australia report on the operation of the 10-year-old National Disability Insurance Scheme. It contends that each leaves Australia with major steps that need to be taken to enable persons with disability to live in a fairer, safer and more inclusive environment in which their human rights are genuinely respected. The reports contain many challenges where a balance needs to be orchestrated between implementation of principled reform and what is financially feasible. If Australia's governments are to adopt the recommendations in the reports, politics will need to be set aside and collaboration between Federal and State governments will be essential. Attitudes and practices will have to change in government and the general community, laws, protocols and even institutions will need to be reformed, accountability mechanisms will need to be tightened, and considerable sums of money will have to be spent.</p>","PeriodicalId":45522,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Medicine","volume":"30 4","pages":"785-805"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This editorial reviews two landmark contributions to disability reform in Australia, both published in 2023 - the 12 volume report of the Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation of People with Disability and the important Commonwealth Government of Australia report on the operation of the 10-year-old National Disability Insurance Scheme. It contends that each leaves Australia with major steps that need to be taken to enable persons with disability to live in a fairer, safer and more inclusive environment in which their human rights are genuinely respected. The reports contain many challenges where a balance needs to be orchestrated between implementation of principled reform and what is financially feasible. If Australia's governments are to adopt the recommendations in the reports, politics will need to be set aside and collaboration between Federal and State governments will be essential. Attitudes and practices will have to change in government and the general community, laws, protocols and even institutions will need to be reformed, accountability mechanisms will need to be tightened, and considerable sums of money will have to be spent.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚残疾法改革:原则、实用主义和政治。
这篇社论回顾了 2023 年出版的两份对澳大利亚残疾人改革具有里程碑意义的报告--皇家残疾人暴力、虐待、忽视和剥削问题委员会(Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation of People with Disability)的 12 卷报告,以及澳大利亚联邦政府(Commonwealth Government of Australia)关于实施 10 年之久的国家残疾人保险计划(National Disability Insurance Scheme)的重要报告。报告认为,这两份报告都给澳大利亚留下了需要采取的重大措施,以使残疾人能够生活在一个更公平、更安全、更具包容性的环境中,使他们的人权得到真正的尊重。这些报告包含了许多挑战,需要在实施原则性改革与财政可行之间取得平衡。如果澳大利亚政府要采纳报告中的建议,就必须摒弃政治因素,联邦政府和州政府之间的合作至关重要。政府和社会各界的态度和做法必须改变,法律、协议甚至机构都必须改革,问责机制必须加强,还必须花费大量资金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊最新文献
Challenging Pandemic Law: From Vaccine Mandates to Judicial Review of Vaccine Approvals. Cystic Fibrosis and the Law: The Ramifications of New Treatments. Denial of Desire for Death in Dementia: Why Is Dementia Excluded from Australian Voluntary Assisted Dying Legislation? Informed Consent and the Duty to Warn: More than the Mere Provision of Information. Insight and the Capacity to Refuse Treatment with Electroconvulsive Therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1