Enhancing Supervised Model Performance in Credit Risk Classification Using Sampling Strategies and Feature Ranking

N. Wattanakitrungroj, Pimchanok Wijitkajee, S. Jaiyen, Sunisa Sathapornvajana, Sasiporn Tongman
{"title":"Enhancing Supervised Model Performance in Credit Risk Classification Using Sampling Strategies and Feature Ranking","authors":"N. Wattanakitrungroj, Pimchanok Wijitkajee, S. Jaiyen, Sunisa Sathapornvajana, Sasiporn Tongman","doi":"10.3390/bdcc8030028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For the financial health of lenders and institutions, one important risk assessment called credit risk is about correctly deciding whether or not a borrower will fail to repay a loan. It not only helps in the approval or denial of loan applications but also aids in managing the non-performing loan (NPL) trend. In this study, a dataset provided by the LendingClub company based in San Francisco, CA, USA, from 2007 to 2020 consisting of 2,925,492 records and 141 attributes was experimented with. The loan status was categorized as “Good” or “Risk”. To yield highly effective results of credit risk prediction, experiments on credit risk prediction were performed using three widely adopted supervised machine learning techniques: logistic regression, random forest, and gradient boosting. In addition, to solve the imbalanced data problem, three sampling algorithms, including under-sampling, over-sampling, and combined sampling, were employed. The results show that the gradient boosting technique achieves nearly perfect Accuracy, Precision, Recall, and F1score values, which are better than 99.92%, but its MCC values are greater than 99.77%. Three imbalanced data handling approaches can enhance the model performance of models trained by three algorithms. Moreover, the experiment of reducing the number of features based on mutual information calculation revealed slightly decreasing performance for 50 data features with Accuracy values greater than 99.86%. For 25 data features, which is the smallest size, the random forest supervised model yielded 99.15% Accuracy. Both sampling strategies and feature selection help to improve the supervised model for accurately predicting credit risk, which may be beneficial in the lending business.","PeriodicalId":505155,"journal":{"name":"Big Data and Cognitive Computing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Big Data and Cognitive Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc8030028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For the financial health of lenders and institutions, one important risk assessment called credit risk is about correctly deciding whether or not a borrower will fail to repay a loan. It not only helps in the approval or denial of loan applications but also aids in managing the non-performing loan (NPL) trend. In this study, a dataset provided by the LendingClub company based in San Francisco, CA, USA, from 2007 to 2020 consisting of 2,925,492 records and 141 attributes was experimented with. The loan status was categorized as “Good” or “Risk”. To yield highly effective results of credit risk prediction, experiments on credit risk prediction were performed using three widely adopted supervised machine learning techniques: logistic regression, random forest, and gradient boosting. In addition, to solve the imbalanced data problem, three sampling algorithms, including under-sampling, over-sampling, and combined sampling, were employed. The results show that the gradient boosting technique achieves nearly perfect Accuracy, Precision, Recall, and F1score values, which are better than 99.92%, but its MCC values are greater than 99.77%. Three imbalanced data handling approaches can enhance the model performance of models trained by three algorithms. Moreover, the experiment of reducing the number of features based on mutual information calculation revealed slightly decreasing performance for 50 data features with Accuracy values greater than 99.86%. For 25 data features, which is the smallest size, the random forest supervised model yielded 99.15% Accuracy. Both sampling strategies and feature selection help to improve the supervised model for accurately predicting credit risk, which may be beneficial in the lending business.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用采样策略和特征排序提高信用风险分类中的监督模型性能
对于贷款人和机构的财务健康而言,有一项重要的风险评估被称为信用风险,即正确判断借款人是否会无法偿还贷款。它不仅有助于批准或拒绝贷款申请,还有助于管理不良贷款(NPL)趋势。在本研究中,我们对位于美国加利福尼亚州旧金山的 LendingClub 公司提供的 2007 年至 2020 年数据集进行了实验,该数据集包含 2,925,492 条记录和 141 个属性。贷款状态分为 "良好 "和 "风险 "两种。为了获得高效的信用风险预测结果,使用了三种广泛采用的监督机器学习技术:逻辑回归、随机森林和梯度提升,对信用风险预测进行了实验。此外,为了解决不平衡数据问题,还采用了三种采样算法,包括欠采样、过采样和组合采样。结果表明,梯度提升技术实现了近乎完美的准确率、精确率、召回率和 F1score 值,均优于 99.92%,但其 MCC 值大于 99.77%。三种不平衡数据处理方法可以提高三种算法训练的模型性能。此外,基于互信息计算减少特征数量的实验表明,50 个数据特征的准确率值大于 99.86%,性能略有下降。对于 25 个数据特征,也就是最小的数据特征,随机森林监督模型的准确率为 99.15%。采样策略和特征选择都有助于改进监督模型,从而准确预测信贷风险,这可能对贷款业务有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Breast Cancer Detection and Localizing the Mass Area Using Deep Learning Trends and Challenges Towards Effective Data-Driven Decision Making in UK Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: Case Studies and Lessons Learnt from the Analysis of 85 Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Demystifying Mental Health by Decoding Facial Action Unit Sequences AMIKOMNET: Novel Structure for a Deep Learning Model to Enhance COVID-19 Classification Task Performance The State of the Art of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Systematic Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1