Fluid Internationalisms: The Ocean as a Source and Forum of Indigenous International Law

Andrew Ambers, Rachel yacaaʔał George
{"title":"Fluid Internationalisms: The Ocean as a Source and Forum of Indigenous International Law","authors":"Andrew Ambers, Rachel yacaaʔał George","doi":"10.18357/bigr51202421801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To rethink ‘the international’ necessarily enables revisioning where sources of law can be located, how normative paradigms operate in situ, and which processes foster cultural, political, and legal principles. In grounding this international reorientation in the ocean and ocean thinking, this analysis offers a brief point of entry into the worlds of Indigenous internationalisms from a coastal, oceanic reference of analysis. We underline not only how the ocean is an international law forum for Indigenous internationalisms, but also how they are vibrant spaces that foster connections between kin and generate legal principles through the methodology of reading seascapes. Through this process, what follows is a submerging of particular ideologies of ‘the international’ and an emerging account of ‘the international’ that facilitates a dynamic transcendence of thinking and being beyond state-premised borders, international relations, law, and sovereignty. Understanding oceans as Indigenous international law fora, as sources of Indigenous legalities, as physical interpretive legal methodologies, and as the connective structures that foster deep connections within and beyond an Indigenous nation, brings us into a socio-legal geography that suspends restrictive, colonial visions of ‘the international’ for a vibrant oceanic future. Recognizing and affirming these oceanic connections contributes to reinscribing Indigenous sovereignty at the scales of individuals, nations, and international relations.","PeriodicalId":216107,"journal":{"name":"Borders in Globalization Review","volume":"126 25","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Borders in Globalization Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18357/bigr51202421801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To rethink ‘the international’ necessarily enables revisioning where sources of law can be located, how normative paradigms operate in situ, and which processes foster cultural, political, and legal principles. In grounding this international reorientation in the ocean and ocean thinking, this analysis offers a brief point of entry into the worlds of Indigenous internationalisms from a coastal, oceanic reference of analysis. We underline not only how the ocean is an international law forum for Indigenous internationalisms, but also how they are vibrant spaces that foster connections between kin and generate legal principles through the methodology of reading seascapes. Through this process, what follows is a submerging of particular ideologies of ‘the international’ and an emerging account of ‘the international’ that facilitates a dynamic transcendence of thinking and being beyond state-premised borders, international relations, law, and sovereignty. Understanding oceans as Indigenous international law fora, as sources of Indigenous legalities, as physical interpretive legal methodologies, and as the connective structures that foster deep connections within and beyond an Indigenous nation, brings us into a socio-legal geography that suspends restrictive, colonial visions of ‘the international’ for a vibrant oceanic future. Recognizing and affirming these oceanic connections contributes to reinscribing Indigenous sovereignty at the scales of individuals, nations, and international relations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
流动的国际主义:海洋作为土著国际法的渊源和论坛
要重新思考 "国际",就必须修改法律渊源的位置,规范范式如何在当地运作,以及哪些进程促进了文化、政治和法律原则。本分析以海洋和海洋思维作为国际重新定位的基础,提供了一个从沿海和海洋分析的参照点进入土著国际主义世界的简短切入点。我们不仅强调海洋如何成为土著国际主义的国际法论坛,还强调海洋如何成为充满活力的空间,促进亲族之间的联系,并通过阅读海景的方法产生法律原则。通过这一过程,随之而来的是对 "国际 "特定意识形态的淹没,以及对 "国际 "的新描述,它促进了对国家预设边界、国际关系、法律和主权之外的思维和存在的动态超越。将海洋理解为土著国际法论坛,理解为土著法律性的来源,理解为实际的解释性法律方法,理解为促进土著民族内部和外部深层联系的连接结构,将我们带入一个社会法律地理学中,为了一个充满活力的海洋未来,暂停对 "国际 "的限制性和殖民主义的看法。承认并肯定这些海洋联系有助于在个人、国家和国际关系层面重新确立土著主权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fluid Internationalisms: The Ocean as a Source and Forum of Indigenous International Law An Interview with Loreisa Lepine: čisélqən tθə sx̌ənəšəns ə tθə iləkʷsiləŋ ɫtə (Following the Footprints of Our Ancestors) Galadzi (Bear) An Interview with Tiffany Joseph: Land and Water Stewardship in a Time of Crisis Call to Prayer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1