The Interactional Zoo: Lessons for Sociology from Erving Goffman’s Engagement with Animal Ethology

IF 4.1 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Sociological Theory Pub Date : 2024-03-05 DOI:10.1177/07352751241230955
Colin Jerolmack, Belicia Teo, Abigail Westberry
{"title":"The Interactional Zoo: Lessons for Sociology from Erving Goffman’s Engagement with Animal Ethology","authors":"Colin Jerolmack, Belicia Teo, Abigail Westberry","doi":"10.1177/07352751241230955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Erving Goffman is one of sociology’s most influential thinkers. Scholars debate the extent to which he worked in competing theoretical traditions (e.g., interactionist or structuralist), yet few acknowledge his intellectual indebtedness to animal ethology. This article traces how naturalistic studies of paralinguistic animal communication influenced Goffman’s corpus and specifies the ideas he built on from that field, especially territoriality and ritualized display. Goffman’s comparative approach to animal and human interaction reveals the shortcomings of sociologists’ lingua-centric approach to interaction; elevates animals to social actors, capable of metacommunication, reading others’ intentions, and adjusting their behavior accordingly; and humbles humans, who he finds enacting rituals of civility for the same reason animals engage in ritualized display: to manage threats and facilitate bonding. Goffman’s thesis on the similarities between animal and human social behavior compels sociology to consider animal studies, and his use of ethology helps reconcile his interactionist and Durkheimian tendencies.","PeriodicalId":48131,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Theory","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07352751241230955","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Erving Goffman is one of sociology’s most influential thinkers. Scholars debate the extent to which he worked in competing theoretical traditions (e.g., interactionist or structuralist), yet few acknowledge his intellectual indebtedness to animal ethology. This article traces how naturalistic studies of paralinguistic animal communication influenced Goffman’s corpus and specifies the ideas he built on from that field, especially territoriality and ritualized display. Goffman’s comparative approach to animal and human interaction reveals the shortcomings of sociologists’ lingua-centric approach to interaction; elevates animals to social actors, capable of metacommunication, reading others’ intentions, and adjusting their behavior accordingly; and humbles humans, who he finds enacting rituals of civility for the same reason animals engage in ritualized display: to manage threats and facilitate bonding. Goffman’s thesis on the similarities between animal and human social behavior compels sociology to consider animal studies, and his use of ethology helps reconcile his interactionist and Durkheimian tendencies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
互动动物园:埃尔文-戈夫曼与动物选育学的交往对社会学的启示
欧文-戈夫曼是社会学界最具影响力的思想家之一。学者们争论他在多大程度上遵循了相互竞争的理论传统(如互动主义或结构主义),但很少有人承认他在思想上对动物伦理学的贡献。本文追溯了对准语言动物交流的自然主义研究如何影响了戈夫曼的研究成果,并具体阐述了他在这一领域的基础上提出的观点,尤其是领地性和仪式化展示。戈夫曼对动物和人类互动的比较方法揭示了社会学家以语言为中心的互动方法的缺陷;将动物提升为社会行动者,使其能够进行元交流,解读他人的意图,并相应地调整自己的行为;并使人类谦卑下来,因为他发现人类制定文明礼仪的原因与动物进行仪式化展示的原因相同:管理威胁和促进联系。戈夫曼关于动物和人类社会行为相似性的论述迫使社会学考虑动物研究,而他对人种学的运用则有助于调和他的互动主义和杜克海姆倾向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sociological Theory
Sociological Theory SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.80%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Published for the American Sociological Association, this important journal covers the full range of sociological theory - from ethnomethodology to world systems analysis, from commentaries on the classics to the latest cutting-edge ideas, and from re-examinations of neglected theorists to metatheoretical inquiries. Its themes and contributions are interdisciplinary, its orientation pluralistic, its pages open to commentary and debate. Renowned for publishing the best international research and scholarship, Sociological Theory is essential reading for sociologists and social theorists alike.
期刊最新文献
Rights Projects: A Relational Sociology of Rights in Globalization The Entangled Emergencies of COVID-19 Class Experience Mobility through Consumption, Work, and Relationships Relational Durkheim: Homo Duplex as the Foundation of a Formalist Cultural Sociology Stranger in the Mirror: Exploring Somatic Defamiliarization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1