The forgotten history of intercropping

Jonathan Harwood
{"title":"The forgotten history of intercropping","authors":"Jonathan Harwood","doi":"10.1002/ppp3.10502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the last 50 years, the practice of ‘intercropping’ (planting a mixture of several crops on the same field) has drawn growing attention in crop science. Given its high yields but low requirement for fertiliser or pesticides, it offers considerable advantages over conventional ‘industrial’ agriculture. Nevertheless, although research on intercropping has been conducted since the late 19th century, that work became largely invisible after 1945 as the rapid rise of industrial agriculture erased alternative approaches from view. Since the 1970s, however, intercropping and other alternatives have reappeared on the research agenda as the damaging impacts of industrial agriculture have become evident.Intercropping has long been of interest in agro‐ecology. Indeed, as the first generation of (English‐speaking) agro‐ecologists saw it, research on intercropping began in the 1970s and 1980s just as the field was beginning to emerge. Although the evidence confirms a rapid increase in such work from the 1970s, however, what nearly all agro‐ecologists then overlooked was the existence of two older traditions of work dating from the late 19th century. The aim of this paper is to explain why early agro‐ecologists were unaware of previous work. The history of research on intercropping in both the English‐ and German‐speaking worlds was traced using the journal literature as well as textbooks of agronomy. What this survey revealed is that in Europe and North America, agronomists had been working on intercropping since the 1890s, and during the interwar period and into the 1950s, the practice attracted considerable attention from colonial agronomists. Although this early work was in the public domain during the 1970s, however, few agro‐ecologists noticed it. There are various reasons why the first generation of agro‐ecologists might have known about but chose to ignore earlier work on intercropping. But more likely is that most members of that generation were simply unaware of the older work. For the forgotten history of intercropping, research appears to be just one aspect of a more general phenomenon during the 20th century in which a wide variety of ‘alternative’ cultivation practices were marginalised after 1945, only to re‐emerge from the 1970s as the social and environmental consequences of industrial agriculture came under attack.","PeriodicalId":508327,"journal":{"name":"PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET","volume":"51 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the last 50 years, the practice of ‘intercropping’ (planting a mixture of several crops on the same field) has drawn growing attention in crop science. Given its high yields but low requirement for fertiliser or pesticides, it offers considerable advantages over conventional ‘industrial’ agriculture. Nevertheless, although research on intercropping has been conducted since the late 19th century, that work became largely invisible after 1945 as the rapid rise of industrial agriculture erased alternative approaches from view. Since the 1970s, however, intercropping and other alternatives have reappeared on the research agenda as the damaging impacts of industrial agriculture have become evident.Intercropping has long been of interest in agro‐ecology. Indeed, as the first generation of (English‐speaking) agro‐ecologists saw it, research on intercropping began in the 1970s and 1980s just as the field was beginning to emerge. Although the evidence confirms a rapid increase in such work from the 1970s, however, what nearly all agro‐ecologists then overlooked was the existence of two older traditions of work dating from the late 19th century. The aim of this paper is to explain why early agro‐ecologists were unaware of previous work. The history of research on intercropping in both the English‐ and German‐speaking worlds was traced using the journal literature as well as textbooks of agronomy. What this survey revealed is that in Europe and North America, agronomists had been working on intercropping since the 1890s, and during the interwar period and into the 1950s, the practice attracted considerable attention from colonial agronomists. Although this early work was in the public domain during the 1970s, however, few agro‐ecologists noticed it. There are various reasons why the first generation of agro‐ecologists might have known about but chose to ignore earlier work on intercropping. But more likely is that most members of that generation were simply unaware of the older work. For the forgotten history of intercropping, research appears to be just one aspect of a more general phenomenon during the 20th century in which a wide variety of ‘alternative’ cultivation practices were marginalised after 1945, only to re‐emerge from the 1970s as the social and environmental consequences of industrial agriculture came under attack.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
被遗忘的间作历史
在过去的 50 年里,"间作"(在同一块土地上混合种植几种作物)的做法越来越受到作物科学的关注。与传统的 "工业化 "农业相比,间作套种产量高,但对化肥或农药的需求量低,因此具有相当大的优势。然而,尽管早在 19 世纪末就已经开展了有关间作套种的研究,但 1945 年后,随着工业化农业的迅速崛起,替代方法逐渐被人们所忽视。然而,自 20 世纪 70 年代以来,随着工业化农业的破坏性影响日益明显,间作套种和其他替代方法重新出现在研究议程上。事实上,正如第一代(讲英语的)农业生态学家所看到的那样,在 20 世纪 70 年代和 80 年代,当该领域刚刚开始兴起时,就开始了对间作套种的研究。尽管有证据证实,从 20 世纪 70 年代开始,此类工作迅速增加,但当时几乎所有的农业生态学家都忽略了从 19 世纪晚期开始存在的两个较早的工作传统。本文旨在解释为什么早期的农业生态学家没有意识到以前的工作。本文利用期刊文献和农学教科书,对英语和德语世界间作研究的历史进行了追溯。这项调查显示,在欧洲和北美,农学家从 19 世纪 90 年代起就开始研究间作套种,在战时和 20 世纪 50 年代,这种做法引起了殖民地农学家的极大关注。尽管这些早期工作在 20 世纪 70 年代已经公开,但很少有农业生态学家注意到这一点。第一代农业生态学家可能知道但却选择忽视早期的间作工作,原因有很多。但更有可能的是,那一代人中的大多数人根本就不知道早先的工作。对于被遗忘的间作历史,研究似乎只是 20 世纪更普遍现象的一个方面,1945 年后,各种各样的 "替代 "种植方法被边缘化,直到 20 世纪 70 年代,随着工业化农业的社会和环境后果受到攻击,才重新出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Towards resource‐efficient forests: Mixing species changes crown biomass allocation and improves growth efficiency Cell wall polysaccharides determine cooking quality in cassava roots Whole genome resequencing reveals the evolutionary history and geographic isolation of the eastern Asian Hickory (Carya) Plant memories: Art co‐created with the public as a tool for investigating how people build lasting connections with plants Solar arrays create novel environments that uniquely alter plant responses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1