Understanding the vertical temperature structure of recent record-shattering heatwaves

Belinda Hotz, L. Papritz, Matthias Röthlisberger
{"title":"Understanding the vertical temperature structure of recent record-shattering heatwaves","authors":"Belinda Hotz, L. Papritz, Matthias Röthlisberger","doi":"10.5194/wcd-5-323-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Extreme heatwaves are one of the most impactful natural hazards, posing risks to human health, infrastructure, and ecosystems. Recent theoretical and observational studies have suggested that the vertical temperature structure during heatwaves limits the magnitude of near-surface heat through convective instability. In this study, we thus examine in detail the vertical temperature structure during three recent record-shattering heatwaves, the Pacific Northwest (PNW) heatwave in 2021, the western Russian (RU) heatwave in 2010, and the western European and UK (UK) heatwave in 2022, by decomposing temperature anomalies (T′) in the entire tropospheric column above the surface into contributions from advection, adiabatic warming and cooling, and diabatic processes. All three heatwaves exhibited bottom-heavy yet vertically deep positive T′ extending throughout the troposphere. Importantly, though, the T′ magnitude and the underlying physical processes varied greatly in the vertical within each heatwave, as well as across distinct heatwaves, reflecting the diverse synoptic storylines of these events. The PNW heatwave was strongly influenced by an upstream cyclone and an associated warm conveyor belt, which amplified an extreme quasi-stationary ridge and generated substantial mid- to upper-tropospheric positive T′ through advection and diabatic heating. In some contrast, positive upper-tropospheric T′ during the RU heatwave was caused by advection, while during the UK heatwave, it exhibited modest positive diabatic contributions from upstream latent heating only during the early phase of the respective ridge. Adiabatic warming notably contributed positively to lower-tropospheric T′ in all three heatwaves, but only in the lowermost 200–300 hPa. Near the surface, all three processes contributed positively to T′ in the PNW and RU heatwaves, while near-surface diabatic T′ was negligible during the UK heatwave. Moreover, there is clear evidence of an amplification and downward propagation of adiabatic T′ during the PNW and UK heatwaves, whereby the maximum near-surface T′ coincided with the arrival of maximum adiabatic T′ in the boundary layer. Additionally, the widespread ageing of near-surface T′ over the course of these events is fully consistent with the notion of heat domes, within which air recirculates and accumulates heat. Our results for the first time document the four-dimensional functioning of anticyclone–heatwave couplets in terms of advection, adiabatic cooling or warming, and diabatic processes and suggest that a complex interplay between large-scale dynamics, moist convection, and boundary layer processes ultimately determines near-surface temperatures during heatwaves.\n","PeriodicalId":508985,"journal":{"name":"Weather and Climate Dynamics","volume":"89 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Weather and Climate Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-323-2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract. Extreme heatwaves are one of the most impactful natural hazards, posing risks to human health, infrastructure, and ecosystems. Recent theoretical and observational studies have suggested that the vertical temperature structure during heatwaves limits the magnitude of near-surface heat through convective instability. In this study, we thus examine in detail the vertical temperature structure during three recent record-shattering heatwaves, the Pacific Northwest (PNW) heatwave in 2021, the western Russian (RU) heatwave in 2010, and the western European and UK (UK) heatwave in 2022, by decomposing temperature anomalies (T′) in the entire tropospheric column above the surface into contributions from advection, adiabatic warming and cooling, and diabatic processes. All three heatwaves exhibited bottom-heavy yet vertically deep positive T′ extending throughout the troposphere. Importantly, though, the T′ magnitude and the underlying physical processes varied greatly in the vertical within each heatwave, as well as across distinct heatwaves, reflecting the diverse synoptic storylines of these events. The PNW heatwave was strongly influenced by an upstream cyclone and an associated warm conveyor belt, which amplified an extreme quasi-stationary ridge and generated substantial mid- to upper-tropospheric positive T′ through advection and diabatic heating. In some contrast, positive upper-tropospheric T′ during the RU heatwave was caused by advection, while during the UK heatwave, it exhibited modest positive diabatic contributions from upstream latent heating only during the early phase of the respective ridge. Adiabatic warming notably contributed positively to lower-tropospheric T′ in all three heatwaves, but only in the lowermost 200–300 hPa. Near the surface, all three processes contributed positively to T′ in the PNW and RU heatwaves, while near-surface diabatic T′ was negligible during the UK heatwave. Moreover, there is clear evidence of an amplification and downward propagation of adiabatic T′ during the PNW and UK heatwaves, whereby the maximum near-surface T′ coincided with the arrival of maximum adiabatic T′ in the boundary layer. Additionally, the widespread ageing of near-surface T′ over the course of these events is fully consistent with the notion of heat domes, within which air recirculates and accumulates heat. Our results for the first time document the four-dimensional functioning of anticyclone–heatwave couplets in terms of advection, adiabatic cooling or warming, and diabatic processes and suggest that a complex interplay between large-scale dynamics, moist convection, and boundary layer processes ultimately determines near-surface temperatures during heatwaves.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解近期破纪录热浪的垂直温度结构
摘要极端热浪是影响最大的自然灾害之一,对人类健康、基础设施和生态系统构成风险。最近的理论和观测研究表明,热浪期间的垂直温度结构通过对流不稳定性限制了近地面热量的大小。因此,在本研究中,我们通过将地表以上整个对流层柱的温度异常(T′)分解为平流、绝热升温和降温以及绝热过程的贡献,详细研究了最近三次创纪录热浪(2021 年西北太平洋热浪、2010 年俄罗斯西部热浪以及 2022 年欧洲西部和英国热浪)期间的垂直温度结构。所有三个热浪都表现出底部重但垂直深度大的正 T′,并延伸到整个对流层。但重要的是,每个热浪以及不同热浪之间的 T′幅度和基本物理过程在垂直方向上有很大差异,反映了这些事件的不同同步故事情节。西北太平洋热浪受到上游气旋和相关暖输送带的强烈影响,气旋和暖输送带放大了一个极端的准静止脊,并通过平流和二重加热产生了大量中上对流层正 T′。与此形成鲜明对比的是,RU 热浪期间的正对流层上层 T′是由平流引起的,而在英国热浪期间,仅在各自海脊的早期阶段,上游潜热才对对流层上层 T′产生适度的正绝热贡献。在所有三个热浪中,绝热升温对低对流层 T′都有显著的正贡献,但只在最下层的 200-300 hPa。在近地面,所有三个过程都对西北太平洋热浪和俄罗斯热浪中的 T′产生了积极影响,而在英国热浪中,近地面的绝热 T′可以忽略不计。此外,有明显的证据表明,在西北太平洋和英国热浪期间,绝热 T′被放大并向下传播,近地面最大 T′与边界层最大绝热 T′同时出现。此外,在这些事件过程中,近地面 T′普遍老化,这完全符合热穹顶的概念,即空气在热穹顶内再循环并积聚热量。我们的研究结果首次从平流、绝热冷却或升温和绝热过程的角度记录了反气旋-热浪对流的四维功能,并表明大尺度动力学、湿对流和边界层过程之间复杂的相互作用最终决定了热浪期间的近地面温度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring the daytime boundary layer evolution based on Doppler spectrum width from multiple coplanar wind lidars during CROSSINN Understanding winter windstorm predictability over Europe How heating tracers drive self-lofting long-lived stratospheric anticyclones: simple dynamical models Warm conveyor belt characteristics and impacts along the life cycle of extratropical cyclones: case studies and climatological analysis based on ERA5 Quantifying uncertainty in simulations of the West African monsoon with the use of surrogate models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1