Individual variation in contact effects – stability, convergence, and divergence

IF 1.8 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Linguistic Approaches To Bilingualism Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1075/lab.22067.bar
M. Barking, Maria Mos, Ad Backus
{"title":"Individual variation in contact effects – stability, convergence, and divergence","authors":"M. Barking, Maria Mos, Ad Backus","doi":"10.1075/lab.22067.bar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this study, we investigate the contact effects of stability, convergence, and divergence regarding the use of\n the same linguistic construction in the same contact situation. To do that, we collected experimental production and judgment data\n by native German speakers living in the Netherlands regarding their usage of the complementizer um ‘to’ in German\n and compared those data to those of a control group of German speakers not in contact with Dutch. The results show that most\n speakers show evidence for some contact-induced language change in their German. At the same time, speakers seem to experience\n different contact effects, demonstrating that it is not the structural properties of the construction that result in one effect\n over the other, but rather factors that pertain to the individual speakers. In particular, we argue that speakers can either focus\n on the similarities or on the differences between their languages, to some extent driven by their attitudes towards their\n languages and language change, and then over-generalize these similarities or differences to new contexts. Overall, this result\n clearly underlines the importance of focusing on individual speakers as the initiators of language change, which is in line with a\n usage-based approach.","PeriodicalId":48664,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Approaches To Bilingualism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Approaches To Bilingualism","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.22067.bar","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we investigate the contact effects of stability, convergence, and divergence regarding the use of the same linguistic construction in the same contact situation. To do that, we collected experimental production and judgment data by native German speakers living in the Netherlands regarding their usage of the complementizer um ‘to’ in German and compared those data to those of a control group of German speakers not in contact with Dutch. The results show that most speakers show evidence for some contact-induced language change in their German. At the same time, speakers seem to experience different contact effects, demonstrating that it is not the structural properties of the construction that result in one effect over the other, but rather factors that pertain to the individual speakers. In particular, we argue that speakers can either focus on the similarities or on the differences between their languages, to some extent driven by their attitudes towards their languages and language change, and then over-generalize these similarities or differences to new contexts. Overall, this result clearly underlines the importance of focusing on individual speakers as the initiators of language change, which is in line with a usage-based approach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接触效应的个体差异--稳定性、趋同性和发散性
在本研究中,我们调查了在同一接触情景中使用同一语言结构时的稳定性、趋同性和差异性的接触效果。为此,我们收集了居住在荷兰的以德语为母语的人在德语中使用补语um "到 "时的实验性生产和判断数据,并将这些数据与未接触荷兰语的德语对照组的数据进行了比较。结果表明,大多数德语使用者的德语都出现了一些由接触引起的语言变化。与此同时,说话者似乎经历了不同的接触效果,这表明不是结构的结构属性导致了不同的效果,而是与说话者个体相关的因素。特别是,我们认为,在一定程度上,说话者对自己的语言和语言变化的态度会促使他们关注语言之间的相似点或不同点,然后将这些相似点或不同点过度概括到新的语境中。总之,这一结果清楚地表明,关注语言变化的发起者--说话者个人是非常重要的,这与以使用为基础的方法是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Linguistic Approaches To Bilingualism
Linguistic Approaches To Bilingualism Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: LAB provides an outlet for cutting-edge, contemporary studies on bilingualism. LAB assumes a broad definition of bilingualism, including: adult L2 acquisition, simultaneous child bilingualism, child L2 acquisition, adult heritage speaker competence, L1 attrition in L2/Ln environments, and adult L3/Ln acquisition. LAB solicits high quality articles of original research assuming any cognitive science approach to understanding the mental representation of bilingual language competence and performance, including cognitive linguistics, emergentism/connectionism, generative theories, psycholinguistic and processing accounts, and covering typical and atypical populations.
期刊最新文献
Language processing in bilingual children Facilitation for non-identical cognates in L3 Bilingual children’s online processing of relative clauses Intonation of polar questions in German-dominant heritage speakers of Italian Sentence processing in bilingual children
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1