Autoimmune central nervous system disorders: Antibody testing and its clinical utility

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Clinical biochemistry Pub Date : 2024-03-08 DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2024.110746
Michael Gilligan , Christopher McGuigan , Andrew McKeon
{"title":"Autoimmune central nervous system disorders: Antibody testing and its clinical utility","authors":"Michael Gilligan ,&nbsp;Christopher McGuigan ,&nbsp;Andrew McKeon","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2024.110746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A rapidly expanding repertoire of neural antibody biomarkers exists for autoimmune central nervous system (CNS) disorders. Following clinical recognition of an autoimmune CNS disorder, the detection of a neural antibody facilitates diagnosis and informs prognosis and management. This review considers the phenotypes, diagnostic assay methodologies, and clinical utility of neural antibodies in autoimmune CNS disorders. Autoimmune CNS disorders may present with a diverse range of clinical features. Clinical phenotype should inform the neural antibodies selected for testing via the use of phenotype-specific panels. Both serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are preferred in the vast majority of cases but for some analytes either CSF (e.g. N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor [NMDA-R] IgG) or serum (e.g. aquaporin-4 [AQP4] IgG) specimens may be preferred. Screening using 2 methods is recommended for most analytes, particularly paraneoplastic antibodies. We utilize murine tissue-based indirect immunofluorescence assay (TIFA) with subsequent confirmatory protein-specific testing. The cellular location of the target antigen informs choice of confirmatory diagnostic assay (e.g. blot for intracellular antigens such as Hu; cell-based assay for cell surface targets such as leucine-rich glioma inactivated 1 [LGI1]). Titers of positive results have limited diagnostic utility with the exception of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) 65 IgG autoimmunity, which is associated with neurological disease at higher values. While novel antibodies are typically discovered using established techniques such as TIFA and immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry, more recent high-throughput molecular technologies (such as protein microarray and phage-display immunoprecipitation sequencing) may expedite the process of antibody discovery. Individual neural antibodies inform the clinician regarding the clinical associations, oncological risk stratification and tumor histology, the likely prognosis, and immunotherapy choice. In the era of neural antibody biomarkers for autoimmune CNS disorders, access to appropriate laboratory assays for neural antibodies is of critical importance in the diagnosis and management of these disorders.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10172,"journal":{"name":"Clinical biochemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009912024000407/pdfft?md5=d7d1443ec12c6602057743688b1082ef&pid=1-s2.0-S0009912024000407-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009912024000407","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A rapidly expanding repertoire of neural antibody biomarkers exists for autoimmune central nervous system (CNS) disorders. Following clinical recognition of an autoimmune CNS disorder, the detection of a neural antibody facilitates diagnosis and informs prognosis and management. This review considers the phenotypes, diagnostic assay methodologies, and clinical utility of neural antibodies in autoimmune CNS disorders. Autoimmune CNS disorders may present with a diverse range of clinical features. Clinical phenotype should inform the neural antibodies selected for testing via the use of phenotype-specific panels. Both serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are preferred in the vast majority of cases but for some analytes either CSF (e.g. N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor [NMDA-R] IgG) or serum (e.g. aquaporin-4 [AQP4] IgG) specimens may be preferred. Screening using 2 methods is recommended for most analytes, particularly paraneoplastic antibodies. We utilize murine tissue-based indirect immunofluorescence assay (TIFA) with subsequent confirmatory protein-specific testing. The cellular location of the target antigen informs choice of confirmatory diagnostic assay (e.g. blot for intracellular antigens such as Hu; cell-based assay for cell surface targets such as leucine-rich glioma inactivated 1 [LGI1]). Titers of positive results have limited diagnostic utility with the exception of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) 65 IgG autoimmunity, which is associated with neurological disease at higher values. While novel antibodies are typically discovered using established techniques such as TIFA and immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry, more recent high-throughput molecular technologies (such as protein microarray and phage-display immunoprecipitation sequencing) may expedite the process of antibody discovery. Individual neural antibodies inform the clinician regarding the clinical associations, oncological risk stratification and tumor histology, the likely prognosis, and immunotherapy choice. In the era of neural antibody biomarkers for autoimmune CNS disorders, access to appropriate laboratory assays for neural antibodies is of critical importance in the diagnosis and management of these disorders.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自身免疫性中枢神经系统疾病:抗体检测及其临床实用性。
针对自身免疫性中枢神经系统疾病的神经抗体生物标志物正在迅速扩大。在临床识别自身免疫性中枢神经系统疾病后,神经抗体的检测有助于诊断,并为预后和管理提供信息。本综述探讨了自身免疫性中枢神经系统疾病中神经抗体的表型、诊断检测方法和临床应用。自身免疫性中枢神经系统疾病可能表现出多种临床特征。临床表型应通过使用表型特异性面板为神经抗体的检测提供依据。在绝大多数情况下,血清和脑脊液都是首选,但对于某些分析物,脑脊液(如 NMDA 受体 IgG)或血清(如水光素-4-IgG)标本可能是首选。对于大多数分析物,尤其是副肿瘤抗体,建议使用两种方法进行筛查。我们采用小鼠组织间接免疫荧光检测法(TIFA),随后进行蛋白质特异性确证检测。目标抗原的细胞位置会影响确诊检测方法的选择(如针对细胞内抗原(如 Hu)的印迹检测;针对细胞表面目标(如 Lgi1)的细胞检测)。阳性结果的滴度对诊断的作用有限,但 GAD65 IgG 自身免疫除外,其值较高时与神经系统疾病相关。虽然新型抗体通常是通过 TIFA 和免疫沉淀质谱法等成熟技术发现的,但最新的高通量分子技术(如蛋白质微阵列和噬菌体显示免疫沉淀测序)可能会加快抗体发现的过程。单个神经抗体可为临床医生提供有关临床关联、肿瘤风险分层和肿瘤组织学、可能的预后以及免疫疗法选择等方面的信息。在自身免疫性中枢神经系统疾病的神经抗体生物标志物时代,获得适当的神经抗体实验室检测方法对这些疾病的诊断和管理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical biochemistry
Clinical biochemistry 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Biochemistry publishes articles relating to clinical chemistry, molecular biology and genetics, therapeutic drug monitoring and toxicology, laboratory immunology and laboratory medicine in general, with the focus on analytical and clinical investigation of laboratory tests in humans used for diagnosis, prognosis, treatment and therapy, and monitoring of disease.
期刊最新文献
Challenges and Perspectives on the Adoption of Cystatin C testing in China: A laboratory technician’s perspective Quantitative evaluation of adalimumab and anti-adalimumab antibodies in sera using a surface plasmon resonance biosensor Inflammation and lipoperoxidation in mucopolysaccharidoses type II patients at diagnosis and post-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Multidisciplinary approach to redefining thyroid hormone reference intervals with big data analysis Relationship between analytical imprecision and coefficient of determination (R2) of the calibration curve
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1