Novel processing and staining methodology of bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) teeth for age determination.

Pub Date : 2024-03-11 DOI:10.1080/01478885.2024.2327155
Christa E Barrett, Ian Evans, Timothy Morgan, Alicia K Olivier
{"title":"Novel processing and staining methodology of bottlenose dolphin (<i>Tursiops truncatus)</i> teeth for age determination.","authors":"Christa E Barrett, Ian Evans, Timothy Morgan, Alicia K Olivier","doi":"10.1080/01478885.2024.2327155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Age determination of bottlenose dolphins (<i>Tursiops truncatus</i>) is a critical tool in understanding both individual and population health. There are many methods of aging bottlenose dolphins including analysis of teeth, pectoral flipper radiographs, and epigenetics. The most common and oldest method for aging toothed cetaceans is the counting of growth layer groups (GLGs) in the teeth. Current techniques have technical and repeatability challenges. Therefore, a processing technique that results in better resolution of GLGs is needed. This study compares different decalcifications and different histochemical staining techniques. Decalcification was done using 10% EDTA, Kristensen's decalcification, and Rapid Decalcification Solution (RDO). Following decalcification and routine processing, GLGs were assessed using Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E), hematoxylin, Giemsa, Wright-Giemsa, Toluidine Blue (T-Blue), Masson's Trichrome, and Congo Red staining techniques. Decalcification with Kristensen's and staining with Masson's Trichrome and Congo Red were determined to best highlight GLGs. This processing and staining was then applied to a sample population of 102 bottlenose dolphins that were evaluated independently and blindly by two observers. Of the 102 dolphin samples, 13 (12.7%) were unable to age due to no clear distinction or distortion between GLGs.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01478885.2024.2327155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Age determination of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) is a critical tool in understanding both individual and population health. There are many methods of aging bottlenose dolphins including analysis of teeth, pectoral flipper radiographs, and epigenetics. The most common and oldest method for aging toothed cetaceans is the counting of growth layer groups (GLGs) in the teeth. Current techniques have technical and repeatability challenges. Therefore, a processing technique that results in better resolution of GLGs is needed. This study compares different decalcifications and different histochemical staining techniques. Decalcification was done using 10% EDTA, Kristensen's decalcification, and Rapid Decalcification Solution (RDO). Following decalcification and routine processing, GLGs were assessed using Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E), hematoxylin, Giemsa, Wright-Giemsa, Toluidine Blue (T-Blue), Masson's Trichrome, and Congo Red staining techniques. Decalcification with Kristensen's and staining with Masson's Trichrome and Congo Red were determined to best highlight GLGs. This processing and staining was then applied to a sample population of 102 bottlenose dolphins that were evaluated independently and blindly by two observers. Of the 102 dolphin samples, 13 (12.7%) were unable to age due to no clear distinction or distortion between GLGs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
用于年龄测定的瓶鼻海豚(Tursiops truncatus)牙齿新处理和染色方法。
瓶鼻海豚(Tursiops truncatus)的年龄测定是了解个体和群体健康状况的重要工具。瓶鼻海豚的年龄测定方法有很多,包括分析牙齿、胸鳍X光片和表观遗传学。最常见、最古老的齿鲸老化方法是计算牙齿中的生长层群(GLGs)。目前的技术在技术和可重复性方面存在挑战。因此,需要一种能更好地解析 GLGs 的处理技术。本研究比较了不同的脱钙方法和不同的组织化学染色技术。脱钙采用10% EDTA、克里斯滕森脱钙法和快速脱钙液(RDO)。脱钙和常规处理后,使用苏木精和伊红(H&E)、苏木精、Giemsa、Wright-Giemsa、甲苯胺蓝(T-Blue)、Masson 三色和刚果红染色技术对 GLG 进行评估。克里斯滕森氏脱钙法和马森三色染色法及刚果红染色法被认为最能突出 GLGs。随后,两名观察员对 102 头瓶鼻海豚样本进行了独立、盲测的处理和染色。在 102 头海豚样本中,有 13 头(12.7%)因 GLGs 之间没有明显区别或变形而无法鉴定年龄。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1