A semantic analysis of social innovation and corporate social responsibility in the Spanish digital press

IF 7.8 3区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Review of Managerial Science Pub Date : 2024-03-09 DOI:10.1007/s11846-024-00743-3
María Arnal-Pastor, José-Miguel Berné-Martínez
{"title":"A semantic analysis of social innovation and corporate social responsibility in the Spanish digital press","authors":"María Arnal-Pastor, José-Miguel Berné-Martínez","doi":"10.1007/s11846-024-00743-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Social innovation and corporate social responsibility (CSR) have been the subject of much research in recent decades. However, these terms are also widely used outside academia, including in the mass media. This paper presents semantic analysis of how these two concepts are portrayed in the generalist digital press. The aim is to detect the attributes linked to social innovation and CSR and verify whether they are consistent with those found in the scientific literature. The results show that social innovation and CSR are linked to the terms “company,” “novelty,” and “institution,” as well as “pandemic” due to the study timeframe (2017–2022). Separate co-occurrence analyses of the terms “social,” “communication,” “innovation,” “policies,” “strategies,” and “practices” show that “company,” “development,” and “institutions” are relevant terms in all cases. The analyses reveal their prevalence in the generalist press. The presence of these terms is discussed in reference to the theoretical framework provided by the scientific literature. This semantic analysis empirically shows that the generalist press portrays social innovation and CSR in a way that is coherent with the portrayal in the academic literature. Moreover, no negative words are found to be associated with these concepts.</p>","PeriodicalId":20992,"journal":{"name":"Review of Managerial Science","volume":"147 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Managerial Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-024-00743-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social innovation and corporate social responsibility (CSR) have been the subject of much research in recent decades. However, these terms are also widely used outside academia, including in the mass media. This paper presents semantic analysis of how these two concepts are portrayed in the generalist digital press. The aim is to detect the attributes linked to social innovation and CSR and verify whether they are consistent with those found in the scientific literature. The results show that social innovation and CSR are linked to the terms “company,” “novelty,” and “institution,” as well as “pandemic” due to the study timeframe (2017–2022). Separate co-occurrence analyses of the terms “social,” “communication,” “innovation,” “policies,” “strategies,” and “practices” show that “company,” “development,” and “institutions” are relevant terms in all cases. The analyses reveal their prevalence in the generalist press. The presence of these terms is discussed in reference to the theoretical framework provided by the scientific literature. This semantic analysis empirically shows that the generalist press portrays social innovation and CSR in a way that is coherent with the portrayal in the academic literature. Moreover, no negative words are found to be associated with these concepts.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对西班牙数字媒体中社会创新和企业社会责任的语义分析
近几十年来,社会创新和企业社会责任(CSR)一直是许多研究的主题。然而,这些术语在学术界之外也被广泛使用,包括在大众媒体中。本文对这两个概念在通用数字媒体中的描述进行了语义分析。目的是发现与社会创新和企业社会责任相关的属性,并验证这些属性是否与科学文献中的属性一致。研究结果表明,社会创新和企业社会责任与 "公司"、"新颖性"、"机构 "以及 "流行病 "等术语相关联,这与研究的时间范围(2017-2022 年)有关。对 "社会"、"传播"、"创新"、"政策"、"战略 "和 "实践 "等词的单独共现分析表明,"公司"、"发展 "和 "机构 "在所有情况下都是相关词。分析表明,这些术语在综合新闻中非常普遍。我们参照科学文献提供的理论框架对这些术语的存在进行了讨论。这种语义分析从经验上表明,综合新闻对社会创新和企业社会责任的描述与学术文献的描述是一致的。此外,没有发现与这些概念相关的负面词汇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
14.50%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Review of Managerial Science (RMS) provides a forum for innovative research from all scientific areas of business administration. The journal publishes original research of high quality and is open to various methodological approaches (analytical modeling, empirical research, experimental work, methodological reasoning etc.). The scope of RMS encompasses – but is not limited to – accounting, auditing, banking, business strategy, corporate governance, entrepreneurship, financial structure and capital markets, health economics, human resources management, information systems, innovation management, insurance, marketing, organization, production and logistics, risk management and taxation. RMS also encourages the submission of papers combining ideas and/or approaches from different areas in an innovative way. Review papers presenting the state of the art of a research area and pointing out new directions for further research are also welcome. The scientific standards of RMS are guaranteed by a rigorous, double-blind peer review process with ad hoc referees and the journal´s internationally composed editorial board.
期刊最新文献
Does CSR facilitate access to trade credit? The role of family ownership Game on: curbing impulse buying and returns in apparel e-tailers Breaking or making futures: How laws and regulations shape innovation in emerging innovation systems From green HRM to SDG success: pathways through exploratory innovation and developmental culture Pathways to survive in abrupt adversities: a configurational approach to understanding the resilience of new venture teams
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1