Fractal Time Series: Background, Estimation Methods, and Performances.

Q3 Neuroscience Advances in neurobiology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1007/978-3-031-47606-8_5
Camillo Porcaro, Sadaf Moaveninejad, Valentina D'Onofrio, Antonio DiIeva
{"title":"Fractal Time Series: Background, Estimation Methods, and Performances.","authors":"Camillo Porcaro, Sadaf Moaveninejad, Valentina D'Onofrio, Antonio DiIeva","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-47606-8_5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the past 40 years, from its classical application in the characterization of geometrical objects, fractal analysis has been progressively applied to study time series in several different disciplines. In neuroscience, starting from identifying the fractal properties of neuronal and brain architecture, attention has shifted to evaluating brain signals in the time domain. Classical linear methods applied to analyzing neurophysiological signals can lead to classifying irregular components as noise, with a potential loss of information. Thus, characterizing fractal properties, namely, self-similarity, scale invariance, and fractal dimension (FD), can provide relevant information on these signals in physiological and pathological conditions. Several methods have been proposed to estimate the fractal properties of these neurophysiological signals. However, the effects of signal characteristics (e.g., its stationarity) and other signal parameters, such as sampling frequency, amplitude, and noise level, have partially been tested. In this chapter, we first outline the main properties of fractals in the domain of space (fractal geometry) and time (fractal time series). Then, after providing an overview of the available methods to estimate the FD, we test them on synthetic time series (STS) with different sampling frequencies, signal amplitudes, and noise levels. Finally, we describe and discuss the performances of each method and the effect of signal parameters on the accuracy of FD estimation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7360,"journal":{"name":"Advances in neurobiology","volume":"36 ","pages":"95-137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in neurobiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47606-8_5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past 40 years, from its classical application in the characterization of geometrical objects, fractal analysis has been progressively applied to study time series in several different disciplines. In neuroscience, starting from identifying the fractal properties of neuronal and brain architecture, attention has shifted to evaluating brain signals in the time domain. Classical linear methods applied to analyzing neurophysiological signals can lead to classifying irregular components as noise, with a potential loss of information. Thus, characterizing fractal properties, namely, self-similarity, scale invariance, and fractal dimension (FD), can provide relevant information on these signals in physiological and pathological conditions. Several methods have been proposed to estimate the fractal properties of these neurophysiological signals. However, the effects of signal characteristics (e.g., its stationarity) and other signal parameters, such as sampling frequency, amplitude, and noise level, have partially been tested. In this chapter, we first outline the main properties of fractals in the domain of space (fractal geometry) and time (fractal time series). Then, after providing an overview of the available methods to estimate the FD, we test them on synthetic time series (STS) with different sampling frequencies, signal amplitudes, and noise levels. Finally, we describe and discuss the performances of each method and the effect of signal parameters on the accuracy of FD estimation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分形时间序列:背景、估算方法和性能。
在过去的 40 年中,分形分析从其在几何物体特征描述中的经典应用,逐渐被应用到多个不同学科的时间序列研究中。在神经科学领域,从识别神经元和大脑结构的分形特性开始,注意力已经转移到评估时域中的大脑信号。用于分析神经生理信号的经典线性方法可能会将不规则成分归类为噪声,从而造成潜在的信息损失。因此,表征分形特性,即自相似性、尺度不变性和分形维度(FD),可以提供这些信号在生理和病理条件下的相关信息。目前已提出了几种方法来估计这些神经生理信号的分形特性。然而,对信号特征(如静止性)和其他信号参数(如采样频率、振幅和噪声水平)的影响还进行了部分测试。在本章中,我们首先概述了分形在空间(分形几何)和时间(分形时间序列)领域的主要特性。然后,在概述了现有的分形估计方法后,我们在不同采样频率、信号幅度和噪声水平的合成时间序列(STS)上对这些方法进行了测试。最后,我们描述并讨论了每种方法的性能以及信号参数对 FD 估计精度的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in neurobiology
Advances in neurobiology Neuroscience-Neurology
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Self-Similarity Logic May Shape the Organization of the Nervous System. Advances in Understanding Fractals in Affective and Anxiety Disorders. Analyzing Eye Paths Using Fractals. Box-Counting Fractal Analysis: A Primer for the Clinician. Clinical Sensitivity of Fractal Neurodynamics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1