{"title":"Decreased fetal movement: Maternal characteristics and pregnancy outcome.","authors":"Khaoual Magdoud, Abir Karoui, Hassine Saber Abouda, Sana Menjli, Haithem Aloui, Mohamed Badis Chanoufi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Decreased fetal movement is a common reason for consultation. It can reveal an intrauterine death or fetal distress.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the epidemiological profile of decreased fetal movement and to identify the predictive factors of poor pregnancy outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective and descriptive study in the department of Maternity between January 2015 and December 2019 including patients hospitalized for decreased fetal movements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 150 patients with a mean age of 30.7±5.8 years. The patients were primiparous in 45.3% of cases. The mean term of pregnancy was 37.17±2.97 weeks. Cardiotocography was pathological in 22.7% of patients. The delivery rate during the hospitalization was 87.3% with a mean term of 37.9±2.5 SA. Poor pregnancy outcome was noted in 22.1% of cases. The identified predictive factors of poor pregnancy outcome were: gestational term less than 37 weeks (ORa=9.42), insufficient prenatal care (ORa=2.85), delayed maternal reporting of decreased fetal movement (ORa=1.29), complications during pregnancy (ORa=3.01), small symphysiofundal height for gestational age (ORa=6.17), pathological cardiotocography (ORa=1.66), fetal growth restriction (ORa=6.17), abnormal Umbilical Artery Doppler (ORa=6.51).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Decreased fetal movement can be a false alarm but it is important to identify predictive factors of poor pregnancy outcome to recognize patients at increased risk and optimize their management.</p>","PeriodicalId":38818,"journal":{"name":"Tunisie Medicale","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11261478/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tunisie Medicale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Decreased fetal movement is a common reason for consultation. It can reveal an intrauterine death or fetal distress.
Aim: To evaluate the epidemiological profile of decreased fetal movement and to identify the predictive factors of poor pregnancy outcome.
Methods: We performed a retrospective and descriptive study in the department of Maternity between January 2015 and December 2019 including patients hospitalized for decreased fetal movements.
Results: The study included 150 patients with a mean age of 30.7±5.8 years. The patients were primiparous in 45.3% of cases. The mean term of pregnancy was 37.17±2.97 weeks. Cardiotocography was pathological in 22.7% of patients. The delivery rate during the hospitalization was 87.3% with a mean term of 37.9±2.5 SA. Poor pregnancy outcome was noted in 22.1% of cases. The identified predictive factors of poor pregnancy outcome were: gestational term less than 37 weeks (ORa=9.42), insufficient prenatal care (ORa=2.85), delayed maternal reporting of decreased fetal movement (ORa=1.29), complications during pregnancy (ORa=3.01), small symphysiofundal height for gestational age (ORa=6.17), pathological cardiotocography (ORa=1.66), fetal growth restriction (ORa=6.17), abnormal Umbilical Artery Doppler (ORa=6.51).
Conclusion: Decreased fetal movement can be a false alarm but it is important to identify predictive factors of poor pregnancy outcome to recognize patients at increased risk and optimize their management.