Prevention and management of enteral nutrition-related diarrhea among adult inpatients: a best practice implementation project.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Jbi Evidence Implementation Pub Date : 2024-03-13 DOI:10.1097/XEB.0000000000000412
Xinyue Zhang, Meijie Du, Mei He, Mei Wang, Mengyao Jiang, Yue Cai, Mengying Cui, Ying Wang
{"title":"Prevention and management of enteral nutrition-related diarrhea among adult inpatients: a best practice implementation project.","authors":"Xinyue Zhang, Meijie Du, Mei He, Mei Wang, Mengyao Jiang, Yue Cai, Mengying Cui, Ying Wang","doi":"10.1097/XEB.0000000000000412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Diarrhea, the most common complication for patients during enteral nutrition, poses a range of risks and care burdens. Medical staff are aware of the importance of proactively preventing and managing enteral nutrition-related diarrhea. However, clinical prevention and management methods are not standardized, and the scientific basis and effectiveness of these methods need to be further verified.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This project aimed to promote evidence-based practices for the prevention and management of enteral nutrition-related diarrhea among adult inpatients in a public tertiary hospital in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This project was guided by the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework and used the JBI Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System (PACES) and the JBI Getting Research into Practice (GRiP) tools. Twelve audit criteria were developed to conduct a baseline audit to measure compliance with best practices. A barrier analysis was conducted, and strategies were implemented to overcome the barriers. The project was finalized with a follow-up audit to determine any changes in compliance with best practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall compliance rate for the audit criteria increased from 27.37% at baseline to 89.62% in the follow-up audit, with six criteria achieving a compliance rate of 100%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implementation of evidence-based practices can effectively narrow the gap between current practice and best practice. This project improved the ability of medical staff to prevent and manage enteral nutrition-related diarrhea, as well as promoting evidence-based practice in the hospital.</p><p><strong>Spanish abstract: </strong>http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A168.</p>","PeriodicalId":48473,"journal":{"name":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000412","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Diarrhea, the most common complication for patients during enteral nutrition, poses a range of risks and care burdens. Medical staff are aware of the importance of proactively preventing and managing enteral nutrition-related diarrhea. However, clinical prevention and management methods are not standardized, and the scientific basis and effectiveness of these methods need to be further verified.

Objectives: This project aimed to promote evidence-based practices for the prevention and management of enteral nutrition-related diarrhea among adult inpatients in a public tertiary hospital in China.

Methods: This project was guided by the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework and used the JBI Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System (PACES) and the JBI Getting Research into Practice (GRiP) tools. Twelve audit criteria were developed to conduct a baseline audit to measure compliance with best practices. A barrier analysis was conducted, and strategies were implemented to overcome the barriers. The project was finalized with a follow-up audit to determine any changes in compliance with best practices.

Results: The overall compliance rate for the audit criteria increased from 27.37% at baseline to 89.62% in the follow-up audit, with six criteria achieving a compliance rate of 100%.

Conclusions: The implementation of evidence-based practices can effectively narrow the gap between current practice and best practice. This project improved the ability of medical staff to prevent and manage enteral nutrition-related diarrhea, as well as promoting evidence-based practice in the hospital.

Spanish abstract: http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A168.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人住院患者肠内营养相关腹泻的预防和管理:最佳实践实施项目。
导言:腹泻是肠内营养期间患者最常见的并发症,会带来一系列风险和护理负担。医务人员意识到积极预防和处理肠内营养相关腹泻的重要性。然而,临床预防和处理方法并不规范,这些方法的科学依据和有效性有待进一步验证:本项目旨在向中国一家公立三甲医院的成年住院患者推广以循证医学为基础的肠内营养相关腹泻预防和管理方法:该项目以JBI循证实施框架为指导,使用了JBI临床证据实际应用系统(PACES)和JBI将研究应用于实践(GRiP)工具。制定了 12 项审核标准,以进行基线审核,衡量最佳实践的合规性。进行了障碍分析,并实施了克服障碍的策略。项目最后进行了一次后续审计,以确定在遵守最佳做法方面是否有任何变化:结果:审计标准的总体合规率从基线的 27.37% 提高到后续审计的 89.62%,其中六项标准的合规率达到 100%:结论:实施循证实践可有效缩小当前实践与最佳实践之间的差距。该项目提高了医务人员预防和处理肠内营养相关腹泻的能力,并在医院内推广了循证实践。西班牙文摘要:http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A168。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Comparison of two audit and feedback approaches: descriptive analysis of personal and contextual dynamics. Collaborative implementation science: a Can-SOLVE CKD case example. Improving communication among nursing staff at a children's hospital in the southern United States: a best practice implementation project. Improving the quality of medication administration practices in a tertiary Australian hospital: a best practice implementation project. Cross-disciplinary advance care planning in oncology and palliative care amidst a pandemic: a best practice implementation project.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1