{"title":"Relationships between the Spinal Dural Pulsations and the Short-Term Efficacy of Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injection","authors":"Chan Hong Park, Sang Ho Lee","doi":"10.1155/2024/1824269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<i>Background</i>. Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) causes low back pain, leg pain, numbness in the leg, and neurogenic intermittent claudication. Epidural steroid injection (ESI) has been used for treating spinal stenosis symptoms. We hypothesized that dural pulsation was variable for lumbar spinal stenosis. In cases of the presence of dural pulsation, the pain relief after the ESI was better than in the absence of dural pulsation. This study aimed at investigating the relationships between the presence or absence of spinal dural pulsations and the efficacy of ESI. <i>Methods</i>. A total of 71 patients were enrolled in this prospective study. Prior to the ESI, the dural pulsation was measured using a 5-1 MHz array ultrasound transducer. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score was measured pre-ESI and 2 weeks post-ESI and 4 weeks post-ESI. At 4 weeks post-ESI, dural pulsation was rechecked. <i>Results</i>. The VAS scores improved after the ESI procedure regardless of the presence or absence of dural pulsation. There was a correlation between the pulsation of the dura and post-ESI VAS scores. However, VAS was not significantly different for different grades of stenosis. <i>Conclusion</i>. The ESI was effective in patients with spinal stenosis in short-term follow-up. Dural pulsation of the spinal cord was a positive predictive factor for the ESI effect, but the grade of spinal stenosis severity had no effect on the effectiveness of ESI.","PeriodicalId":501829,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research and Management","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/1824269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background. Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) causes low back pain, leg pain, numbness in the leg, and neurogenic intermittent claudication. Epidural steroid injection (ESI) has been used for treating spinal stenosis symptoms. We hypothesized that dural pulsation was variable for lumbar spinal stenosis. In cases of the presence of dural pulsation, the pain relief after the ESI was better than in the absence of dural pulsation. This study aimed at investigating the relationships between the presence or absence of spinal dural pulsations and the efficacy of ESI. Methods. A total of 71 patients were enrolled in this prospective study. Prior to the ESI, the dural pulsation was measured using a 5-1 MHz array ultrasound transducer. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score was measured pre-ESI and 2 weeks post-ESI and 4 weeks post-ESI. At 4 weeks post-ESI, dural pulsation was rechecked. Results. The VAS scores improved after the ESI procedure regardless of the presence or absence of dural pulsation. There was a correlation between the pulsation of the dura and post-ESI VAS scores. However, VAS was not significantly different for different grades of stenosis. Conclusion. The ESI was effective in patients with spinal stenosis in short-term follow-up. Dural pulsation of the spinal cord was a positive predictive factor for the ESI effect, but the grade of spinal stenosis severity had no effect on the effectiveness of ESI.
背景。腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)会导致腰痛、腿痛、腿部麻木和神经源性间歇性跛行。硬膜外类固醇注射(ESI)已被用于治疗椎管狭窄症状。我们假设硬脊膜搏动是腰椎管狭窄症的可变因素。在存在硬脊膜搏动的情况下,ESI 后的疼痛缓解效果优于无硬脊膜搏动的情况。本研究旨在探讨是否存在脊髓硬脊膜搏动与 ESI 疗效之间的关系。研究方法共有 71 名患者参与了这项前瞻性研究。在进行 ESI 之前,使用 5-1 MHz 阵列超声换能器测量硬脊膜搏动。ESI前、ESI后2周和4周测量视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分。硬膜外麻醉后 4 周,再次检查硬膜搏动。结果。无论是否存在硬脊膜搏动,ESI术后VAS评分均有所改善。硬脊膜搏动与ESI术后VAS评分之间存在相关性。不过,不同狭窄等级的 VAS 没有明显差异。结论。在短期随访中,ESI对椎管狭窄患者有效。脊髓硬膜搏动是预测 ESI 效果的一个积极因素,但脊柱狭窄严重程度的等级对 ESI 的效果没有影响。