Influence of Frailty Status on the Efficacy of Epidural Steroid Injections in Elderly Patients With Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Disease.

Hee Jung Kim,Ho Jae Nam,Shin Hyung Kim
{"title":"Influence of Frailty Status on the Efficacy of Epidural Steroid Injections in Elderly Patients With Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Disease.","authors":"Hee Jung Kim,Ho Jae Nam,Shin Hyung Kim","doi":"10.1155/2024/5038496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The global increase in the elderly population has led to a higher prevalence of degenerative lumbar spinal diseases. Epidural steroid injection (ESI) is a widely used procedure for managing lower back pain. This study investigated the association of preprocedural frailty status with the efficacy of ESI in elderly patients diagnosed with degenerative lumbar spinal diseases. Methods: This retrospective observational study included patients aged 65 years and older who underwent lumbar ESI. Frailty status (robust, prefrail, and frail) assessed via the Frailty Phenotype Questionnaire was collected along with demographic and clinical parameters. Good analgesia was defined as a ≥ 50% reduction in pain score at 4-week follow-up evaluation. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with poor analgesia. Results: We included 289 patients in this study. Frailty status correlated with analgesic outcomes, with worsening frailty status correlating with increasingly poor analgesia after the injection (robust = 34.5%, prefrail = 40.8%, and frail = 60.0%, p=0.003), predominantly in female patients. After adjusting for demographic and clinical factors, frail patients demonstrated much higher odds of poor analgesia than robust individuals (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.673, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.338-5.342, p=0.005). Conversely, prefrail patients did not show a significant association with analgesic outcome (aOR = 1.293, 95% CI = 0.736-2.272, p=0.372). Conclusions: Frailty, but not prefrailty, appeared to be an independent factor associated with poor analgesic efficacy of ESI in elderly patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar spinal disease receiving conservative care.","PeriodicalId":501829,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research and Management","volume":"16 1","pages":"5038496"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5038496","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The global increase in the elderly population has led to a higher prevalence of degenerative lumbar spinal diseases. Epidural steroid injection (ESI) is a widely used procedure for managing lower back pain. This study investigated the association of preprocedural frailty status with the efficacy of ESI in elderly patients diagnosed with degenerative lumbar spinal diseases. Methods: This retrospective observational study included patients aged 65 years and older who underwent lumbar ESI. Frailty status (robust, prefrail, and frail) assessed via the Frailty Phenotype Questionnaire was collected along with demographic and clinical parameters. Good analgesia was defined as a ≥ 50% reduction in pain score at 4-week follow-up evaluation. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with poor analgesia. Results: We included 289 patients in this study. Frailty status correlated with analgesic outcomes, with worsening frailty status correlating with increasingly poor analgesia after the injection (robust = 34.5%, prefrail = 40.8%, and frail = 60.0%, p=0.003), predominantly in female patients. After adjusting for demographic and clinical factors, frail patients demonstrated much higher odds of poor analgesia than robust individuals (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.673, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.338-5.342, p=0.005). Conversely, prefrail patients did not show a significant association with analgesic outcome (aOR = 1.293, 95% CI = 0.736-2.272, p=0.372). Conclusions: Frailty, but not prefrailty, appeared to be an independent factor associated with poor analgesic efficacy of ESI in elderly patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar spinal disease receiving conservative care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虚弱状态对腰椎退行性疾病老年患者硬膜外类固醇注射疗效的影响
背景:随着全球老年人口的增加,腰椎退行性疾病的发病率也越来越高。硬膜外类固醇注射(ESI)是一种广泛用于治疗下背痛的方法。本研究探讨了在确诊为腰椎退行性疾病的老年患者中,术前体弱状况与 ESI 疗效的关系。研究方法这项回顾性观察研究纳入了接受腰椎ESI手术的65岁及以上患者。通过 "虚弱表型问卷 "评估患者的虚弱状态(健壮、虚弱前和虚弱),同时收集人口统计学和临床参数。在四周的随访评估中,疼痛评分降低≥50%即为镇痛良好。进行了多变量逻辑回归分析,以确定与镇痛效果不佳相关的因素。研究结果本研究共纳入 289 名患者。虚弱状态与镇痛效果相关,虚弱状态恶化与注射后镇痛效果越来越差相关(强壮=34.5%,虚弱前=40.8%,虚弱=60.0%,P=0.003),女性患者居多。在对人口统计学和临床因素进行调整后,体弱患者出现镇痛不良的几率远远高于健壮患者(调整后的几率比 [aOR] = 2.673,95% 置信区间 [CI] = 1.338-5.342,p=0.005)。相反,前倾型患者与镇痛结果无明显关联(aOR = 1.293,95% CI = 0.736-2.272,p=0.372)。结论对于接受保守治疗的无症状退行性腰椎病老年患者来说,体弱似乎是导致ESI镇痛效果不佳的一个独立因素,而不是先天性体弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of Frailty Status on the Efficacy of Epidural Steroid Injections in Elderly Patients With Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Disease. Efficacy and Safety of Pulsed Radiofrequency of Dorsal Root Ganglion in Elderly Patient Population With Acute and Subacute Zoster-Related Pain. Reduced Fascicle Area Demonstrated in Ilioinguinal Nerves Resected from Primary Inguinal Herniorrhaphy Patients as Evidence of Compression Neuropathy The Causal Relationship between Angina Pectoris and Gout Based on Two Sample Mendelian Randomization Efficacy and Safety of Computed Tomography-Guided Percutaneous Balloon Compression under Local Anesthesia for Recurrent Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Prospective Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1