Molnupiravir for the treatment of COVID-19 outpatients: An updated meta-analysis

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jmii.2024.03.002
Huzaifa Ahmad Cheema , Saleha Abdul Rab , Momina Butt , Uzair Jafar , Abia Shahid , Aqeeb Ur Rehman , Ka Yiu Lee , Syeda Sahra , Ranjit Sah
{"title":"Molnupiravir for the treatment of COVID-19 outpatients: An updated meta-analysis","authors":"Huzaifa Ahmad Cheema ,&nbsp;Saleha Abdul Rab ,&nbsp;Momina Butt ,&nbsp;Uzair Jafar ,&nbsp;Abia Shahid ,&nbsp;Aqeeb Ur Rehman ,&nbsp;Ka Yiu Lee ,&nbsp;Syeda Sahra ,&nbsp;Ranjit Sah","doi":"10.1016/j.jmii.2024.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The majority of available data on molnupiravir come from an unvaccinated COVID-19 population. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to integrate evidence from recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) as well as observational studies stratified by vaccination status to determine the clinical efficacy and safety of molnupiravir in COVID-19 outpatients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, medRxiv, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to November 2023. We conducted our meta-analysis using RevMan 5.4 with risk ratio (RR) as the effect measure.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 8 RCTs and 5 observational studies in our meta-analysis. Molnupiravir reduced the risk of all-cause mortality (RR 0.28; 95% CI: 0.20–0.79, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) but did not decrease the hospitalization rate (RR 0.67; 95% CI: 0.45–1.00, I<sup>2</sup> = 53%) in the overall population; in the immunized population, no benefits were observed. Molnupiravir lowered the rate of no recovery (RR 0.78; 95% CI: 0.76–0.81, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) and increased virological clearance at day 5 (RR 2.68; 95% CI: 1.94–4.22, I<sup>2</sup> = 85%). There was no increase in the incidence of adverse events.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Molnupiravir does not decrease mortality and hospitalization rates in immunized patients with COVID-19. However, it does shorten the disease course and increases the recovery rate. The use of molnupiravir will need to be considered on a case-by-case basis in the context of the prevailing social circumstances, the resource setting, drug costs, and the healthcare burden.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56117,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection","volume":"57 3","pages":"Pages 396-402"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1684118224000483/pdfft?md5=4b6955650f5b9b2cd94342d06166bf4f&pid=1-s2.0-S1684118224000483-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1684118224000483","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The majority of available data on molnupiravir come from an unvaccinated COVID-19 population. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to integrate evidence from recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) as well as observational studies stratified by vaccination status to determine the clinical efficacy and safety of molnupiravir in COVID-19 outpatients.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, medRxiv, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to November 2023. We conducted our meta-analysis using RevMan 5.4 with risk ratio (RR) as the effect measure.

Results

We included 8 RCTs and 5 observational studies in our meta-analysis. Molnupiravir reduced the risk of all-cause mortality (RR 0.28; 95% CI: 0.20–0.79, I2 = 0%) but did not decrease the hospitalization rate (RR 0.67; 95% CI: 0.45–1.00, I2 = 53%) in the overall population; in the immunized population, no benefits were observed. Molnupiravir lowered the rate of no recovery (RR 0.78; 95% CI: 0.76–0.81, I2 = 0%) and increased virological clearance at day 5 (RR 2.68; 95% CI: 1.94–4.22, I2 = 85%). There was no increase in the incidence of adverse events.

Conclusions

Molnupiravir does not decrease mortality and hospitalization rates in immunized patients with COVID-19. However, it does shorten the disease course and increases the recovery rate. The use of molnupiravir will need to be considered on a case-by-case basis in the context of the prevailing social circumstances, the resource setting, drug costs, and the healthcare burden.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于治疗COVID-19门诊患者的莫诺吡韦:最新荟萃分析
关于莫仑拉韦的大部分现有数据都来自未接种疫苗的 COVID-19 群体。因此,我们进行了这项荟萃分析,以整合近期随机对照试验 (RCT) 以及按疫苗接种情况分层的观察性研究的证据,从而确定莫仑匹拉韦对 COVID-19 门诊患者的临床疗效和安全性。我们检索了从开始到 2023 年 11 月的 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、medRxiv 和 ClinicalTrials.gov。我们使用 RevMan 5.4 进行了荟萃分析,并将风险比 (RR) 作为效果测量指标。我们在荟萃分析中纳入了 8 项研究性临床试验和 5 项观察性研究。在总体人群中,莫能吡韦降低了全因死亡风险(RR 0.28;95% CI:0.20-0.79,I= 0%),但没有降低住院率(RR 0.67;95% CI:0.45-1.00,I= 53%);在免疫人群中,没有观察到任何益处。莫能吡韦降低了无康复率(RR 0.78;95% CI:0.76-0.81,I= 0%),提高了第 5 天的病毒清除率(RR 2.68;95% CI:1.94-4.22,I= 85%)。不良事件的发生率没有增加。莫仑匹韦不会降低COVID-19免疫患者的死亡率和住院率。不过,它确实缩短了病程,提高了康复率。在使用莫仑匹拉韦时,需要根据当时的社会环境、资源环境、药物成本和医疗负担等因素逐一考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection
Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection IMMUNOLOGY-INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
5.40%
发文量
159
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection is an open access journal, committed to disseminating information on the latest trends and advances in microbiology, immunology, infectious diseases and parasitology. Article types considered include perspectives, review articles, original articles, brief reports and correspondence. With the aim of promoting effective and accurate scientific information, an expert panel of referees constitutes the backbone of the peer-review process in evaluating the quality and content of manuscripts submitted for publication.
期刊最新文献
Interaction of human neutrophils with Trichomonas vaginalis protozoan highlights lactoferrin secretion. Drug monitoring was conducted for rifapentine among people with HIV receiving dolutegravir containing antiretroviral therapy and latent tuberculosis treatment. Comparative monocyte and T cell responses in DENV-exposed subjects from South-East Asia and DENV-naïve residents in Taiwan. Identifying the function of novel cross-species microRNAs from the excretory-secretory products of Angiostrongylus cantonensis fifth-stage larvae. Forty years of HIV infection and AIDS in Taiwan: Reflection on the past and looking toward the future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1