James T F Wise, Haiyan Lu, Idoia Meaza, Sandra S Wise, Aggie R Williams, Jamie Young Wise, Michael D Mason, John Pierce Wise
{"title":"Prolonged Particulate Hexavalent Chromium Exposure Induces DNA Double-Strand Breaks and Inhibits Homologous Recombination Repair in Primary Rodent Lung Cells.","authors":"James T F Wise, Haiyan Lu, Idoia Meaza, Sandra S Wise, Aggie R Williams, Jamie Young Wise, Michael D Mason, John Pierce Wise","doi":"10.1007/s12011-024-04136-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] is a known lung carcinogen and a driving mechanism in human lung cells for Cr(VI)-induced lung cancer is chromosome instability, caused by prolonged Cr(VI) exposure inducing DNA double-strand breaks, while simultaneously inhibiting the repair of these breaks. In North Atlantic right whales, Cr(VI) induces breaks but does not inhibit repair. It is unclear if this repair inhibition is specific to human lung cells or occurs in other species, as it has only been considered in humans and North Atlantic right whales. We evaluated these outcomes in rodent cells, as rodents are an experimental model for metal-induced lung carcinogenesis. We used a guinea pig lung fibroblast cell line, JH4 Clone 1, and rat lung fibroblasts. Cells were exposed to two different particulate Cr(VI) compounds, ranging from 0 to 0.5 ug/cm<sup>2</sup>, for 24 or 120 h and assessed for cytotoxicity, DNA double-strand breaks, and DNA double-strand break repair. Both particulate Cr(VI) compounds induced a concentration-dependent increase in cytotoxicity and DNA double-strand breaks after acute and prolonged exposures. Notably, while the repair of Cr(VI)-induced DNA double-strand breaks increased after acute exposure, the repair of these breaks was inhibited after prolonged exposure. These results are consistent with outcomes in human lung cells indicating rodent cells respond like human cells, while whale cells have a markedly different response.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11408706/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-024-04136-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] is a known lung carcinogen and a driving mechanism in human lung cells for Cr(VI)-induced lung cancer is chromosome instability, caused by prolonged Cr(VI) exposure inducing DNA double-strand breaks, while simultaneously inhibiting the repair of these breaks. In North Atlantic right whales, Cr(VI) induces breaks but does not inhibit repair. It is unclear if this repair inhibition is specific to human lung cells or occurs in other species, as it has only been considered in humans and North Atlantic right whales. We evaluated these outcomes in rodent cells, as rodents are an experimental model for metal-induced lung carcinogenesis. We used a guinea pig lung fibroblast cell line, JH4 Clone 1, and rat lung fibroblasts. Cells were exposed to two different particulate Cr(VI) compounds, ranging from 0 to 0.5 ug/cm2, for 24 or 120 h and assessed for cytotoxicity, DNA double-strand breaks, and DNA double-strand break repair. Both particulate Cr(VI) compounds induced a concentration-dependent increase in cytotoxicity and DNA double-strand breaks after acute and prolonged exposures. Notably, while the repair of Cr(VI)-induced DNA double-strand breaks increased after acute exposure, the repair of these breaks was inhibited after prolonged exposure. These results are consistent with outcomes in human lung cells indicating rodent cells respond like human cells, while whale cells have a markedly different response.